Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium

In 2014, the Request for Applications from the National Institutes of Health. (NIH) for continued funding of a multi-site clinical and mechanistic research. Network, Inner City Asthma Consortium (ICAC), called for “efficient IRB review. And approval for multi-center studies” and “IRB approval within...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoffel, Brandy, Sorkness, Christine, Pech, Carol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.09.001
_version_ 1783305597077159936
author Stoffel, Brandy
Sorkness, Christine
Pech, Carol
author_facet Stoffel, Brandy
Sorkness, Christine
Pech, Carol
author_sort Stoffel, Brandy
collection PubMed
description In 2014, the Request for Applications from the National Institutes of Health. (NIH) for continued funding of a multi-site clinical and mechanistic research. Network, Inner City Asthma Consortium (ICAC), called for “efficient IRB review. And approval for multi-center studies” and “IRB approval within 30 days from. Submission”. These requirements were precursors to the NIH policy of single. IRB review for multi-site studies. Here we share our challenges, implementation processes, results, and recommendations, using a single, independent IRB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5846487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58464872018-04-25 Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium Stoffel, Brandy Sorkness, Christine Pech, Carol Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article In 2014, the Request for Applications from the National Institutes of Health. (NIH) for continued funding of a multi-site clinical and mechanistic research. Network, Inner City Asthma Consortium (ICAC), called for “efficient IRB review. And approval for multi-center studies” and “IRB approval within 30 days from. Submission”. These requirements were precursors to the NIH policy of single. IRB review for multi-site studies. Here we share our challenges, implementation processes, results, and recommendations, using a single, independent IRB. Elsevier 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5846487/ /pubmed/29546249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.09.001 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stoffel, Brandy
Sorkness, Christine
Pech, Carol
Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium
title Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium
title_full Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium
title_fullStr Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium
title_full_unstemmed Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium
title_short Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium
title_sort use of a single, independent irb: case study of an nih funded consortium
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.09.001
work_keys_str_mv AT stoffelbrandy useofasingleindependentirbcasestudyofannihfundedconsortium
AT sorknesschristine useofasingleindependentirbcasestudyofannihfundedconsortium
AT pechcarol useofasingleindependentirbcasestudyofannihfundedconsortium

Ejemplares similares