Cargando…

Profiling DNA methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the Illumina Human Infinium MethylationEPIC microarray

The Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC provides an efficient platform for profiling DNA methylation in humans at over 850,000 CpGs. Model organisms such as mice do not currently benefit from an equivalent array. Here we used this array to measure DNA methylation in mice. We defined probes targeting c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gujar, Hemant, Liang, Jane W., Wong, Nicholas C., Mozhui, Khyobeni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29529061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193496
_version_ 1783305616292315136
author Gujar, Hemant
Liang, Jane W.
Wong, Nicholas C.
Mozhui, Khyobeni
author_facet Gujar, Hemant
Liang, Jane W.
Wong, Nicholas C.
Mozhui, Khyobeni
author_sort Gujar, Hemant
collection PubMed
description The Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC provides an efficient platform for profiling DNA methylation in humans at over 850,000 CpGs. Model organisms such as mice do not currently benefit from an equivalent array. Here we used this array to measure DNA methylation in mice. We defined probes targeting conserved regions and performed differential methylation analysis and compared between the array-based assay and affinity-based DNA sequencing of methyl-CpGs (MBD-seq) and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Mouse samples consisted of 11 liver DNA from two strains, C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2), that varied widely in age. Linear regression was applied to detect differential methylation. In total, 13,665 probes (1.6% of total probes) aligned to conserved CpGs. Beta-values (β-value) for these probes showed a distribution similar to that in humans. Overall, there was high concordance in methylation signal between the EPIC array and MBD-seq (Pearson correlation r = 0.70, p-value < 0.0001). However, the EPIC probes had higher quantitative sensitivity at CpGs that are hypo- (β-value < 0.3) or hypermethylated (β-value > 0.7). In terms of differential methylation, no EPIC probe detected a significant difference between age groups at a Benjamini-Hochberg threshold of 10%, and the MBD-seq performed better at detecting age-dependent change in methylation. However, the top most significant probe for age (cg13269407; uncorrected p-value = 1.8 x 10(−5)) is part of the clock CpGs used to estimate the human epigenetic age. For strain, 219 EPIC probes detected significant differential methylation (FDR cutoff 10%) with ~80% CpGs associated with higher methylation in D2. This higher methylation profile in D2 compared to B6 was also replicated by the MBD-seq data. To summarize, we found only a small subset of EPIC probes that target conserved sites. However, for this small subset the array provides a reliable assay of DNA methylation and can be effectively used to measure differential methylation in mice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5846735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58467352018-03-23 Profiling DNA methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the Illumina Human Infinium MethylationEPIC microarray Gujar, Hemant Liang, Jane W. Wong, Nicholas C. Mozhui, Khyobeni PLoS One Research Article The Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC provides an efficient platform for profiling DNA methylation in humans at over 850,000 CpGs. Model organisms such as mice do not currently benefit from an equivalent array. Here we used this array to measure DNA methylation in mice. We defined probes targeting conserved regions and performed differential methylation analysis and compared between the array-based assay and affinity-based DNA sequencing of methyl-CpGs (MBD-seq) and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Mouse samples consisted of 11 liver DNA from two strains, C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2), that varied widely in age. Linear regression was applied to detect differential methylation. In total, 13,665 probes (1.6% of total probes) aligned to conserved CpGs. Beta-values (β-value) for these probes showed a distribution similar to that in humans. Overall, there was high concordance in methylation signal between the EPIC array and MBD-seq (Pearson correlation r = 0.70, p-value < 0.0001). However, the EPIC probes had higher quantitative sensitivity at CpGs that are hypo- (β-value < 0.3) or hypermethylated (β-value > 0.7). In terms of differential methylation, no EPIC probe detected a significant difference between age groups at a Benjamini-Hochberg threshold of 10%, and the MBD-seq performed better at detecting age-dependent change in methylation. However, the top most significant probe for age (cg13269407; uncorrected p-value = 1.8 x 10(−5)) is part of the clock CpGs used to estimate the human epigenetic age. For strain, 219 EPIC probes detected significant differential methylation (FDR cutoff 10%) with ~80% CpGs associated with higher methylation in D2. This higher methylation profile in D2 compared to B6 was also replicated by the MBD-seq data. To summarize, we found only a small subset of EPIC probes that target conserved sites. However, for this small subset the array provides a reliable assay of DNA methylation and can be effectively used to measure differential methylation in mice. Public Library of Science 2018-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5846735/ /pubmed/29529061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193496 Text en © 2018 Gujar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gujar, Hemant
Liang, Jane W.
Wong, Nicholas C.
Mozhui, Khyobeni
Profiling DNA methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the Illumina Human Infinium MethylationEPIC microarray
title Profiling DNA methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the Illumina Human Infinium MethylationEPIC microarray
title_full Profiling DNA methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the Illumina Human Infinium MethylationEPIC microarray
title_fullStr Profiling DNA methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the Illumina Human Infinium MethylationEPIC microarray
title_full_unstemmed Profiling DNA methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the Illumina Human Infinium MethylationEPIC microarray
title_short Profiling DNA methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the Illumina Human Infinium MethylationEPIC microarray
title_sort profiling dna methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the illumina human infinium methylationepic microarray
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29529061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193496
work_keys_str_mv AT gujarhemant profilingdnamethylationdifferencesbetweeninbredmousestrainsontheilluminahumaninfiniummethylationepicmicroarray
AT liangjanew profilingdnamethylationdifferencesbetweeninbredmousestrainsontheilluminahumaninfiniummethylationepicmicroarray
AT wongnicholasc profilingdnamethylationdifferencesbetweeninbredmousestrainsontheilluminahumaninfiniummethylationepicmicroarray
AT mozhuikhyobeni profilingdnamethylationdifferencesbetweeninbredmousestrainsontheilluminahumaninfiniummethylationepicmicroarray