Cargando…

Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements

Kinematic analysis of upper limb reaching provides insight into the central nervous system control of movements. Until recently, kinematic examination of motor control has been limited to studies conducted in traditional research laboratories because motion capture equipment used for data collection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa, Gonzalez, David, Nouredanesh, Mina, Tung, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29529064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193639
_version_ 1783305630676680704
author Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa
Gonzalez, David
Nouredanesh, Mina
Tung, James
author_facet Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa
Gonzalez, David
Nouredanesh, Mina
Tung, James
author_sort Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa
collection PubMed
description Kinematic analysis of upper limb reaching provides insight into the central nervous system control of movements. Until recently, kinematic examination of motor control has been limited to studies conducted in traditional research laboratories because motion capture equipment used for data collection is not easily portable and expensive. A recently developed markerless system, the Leap Motion Controller (LMC), is a portable and inexpensive tracking device that allows recording of 3D hand and finger position. The main goal of this study was to assess the concurrent reliability and validity of the LMC as compared to the Optotrak, a criterion-standard motion capture system, for measures of temporal accuracy and peak velocity during the performance of upper limb, visually-guided movements. In experiment 1, 14 participants executed aiming movements to visual targets presented on a computer monitor. Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to assess the validity and limits of agreement for measures of temporal accuracy (movement time, duration of deceleration interval), peak velocity, and spatial accuracy (endpoint accuracy). In addition, a one-sample t-test was used to test the hypothesis that the error difference between measures obtained from Optotrak and LMC is zero. In experiment 2, 15 participants performed a Fitts’ type aiming task in order to assess whether the LMC is capable of assessing a well-known speed-accuracy trade-off relationship. Experiment 3 assessed the temporal coordination pattern during the performance of a sequence consisting of a reaching, grasping, and placement task in 15 participants. Results from the t-test showed that the error difference in temporal measures was significantly different from zero. Based on the results from the 3 experiments, the average temporal error in movement time was 40±44 ms, and the error in peak velocity was 0.024±0.103 m/s. The limits of agreement between the LMC and Optotrak for spatial accuracy measures ranged between 2–5 cm. Although the LMC system is a low-cost, highly portable system, which could facilitate collection of kinematic data outside of the traditional laboratory settings, the temporal and spatial errors may limit the use of the device in some settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5846796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58467962018-03-23 Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa Gonzalez, David Nouredanesh, Mina Tung, James PLoS One Research Article Kinematic analysis of upper limb reaching provides insight into the central nervous system control of movements. Until recently, kinematic examination of motor control has been limited to studies conducted in traditional research laboratories because motion capture equipment used for data collection is not easily portable and expensive. A recently developed markerless system, the Leap Motion Controller (LMC), is a portable and inexpensive tracking device that allows recording of 3D hand and finger position. The main goal of this study was to assess the concurrent reliability and validity of the LMC as compared to the Optotrak, a criterion-standard motion capture system, for measures of temporal accuracy and peak velocity during the performance of upper limb, visually-guided movements. In experiment 1, 14 participants executed aiming movements to visual targets presented on a computer monitor. Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to assess the validity and limits of agreement for measures of temporal accuracy (movement time, duration of deceleration interval), peak velocity, and spatial accuracy (endpoint accuracy). In addition, a one-sample t-test was used to test the hypothesis that the error difference between measures obtained from Optotrak and LMC is zero. In experiment 2, 15 participants performed a Fitts’ type aiming task in order to assess whether the LMC is capable of assessing a well-known speed-accuracy trade-off relationship. Experiment 3 assessed the temporal coordination pattern during the performance of a sequence consisting of a reaching, grasping, and placement task in 15 participants. Results from the t-test showed that the error difference in temporal measures was significantly different from zero. Based on the results from the 3 experiments, the average temporal error in movement time was 40±44 ms, and the error in peak velocity was 0.024±0.103 m/s. The limits of agreement between the LMC and Optotrak for spatial accuracy measures ranged between 2–5 cm. Although the LMC system is a low-cost, highly portable system, which could facilitate collection of kinematic data outside of the traditional laboratory settings, the temporal and spatial errors may limit the use of the device in some settings. Public Library of Science 2018-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5846796/ /pubmed/29529064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193639 Text en © 2018 Niechwiej-Szwedo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa
Gonzalez, David
Nouredanesh, Mina
Tung, James
Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements
title Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements
title_full Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements
title_short Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements
title_sort evaluation of the leap motion controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29529064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193639
work_keys_str_mv AT niechwiejszwedoewa evaluationoftheleapmotioncontrollerduringtheperformanceofvisuallyguidedupperlimbmovements
AT gonzalezdavid evaluationoftheleapmotioncontrollerduringtheperformanceofvisuallyguidedupperlimbmovements
AT nouredaneshmina evaluationoftheleapmotioncontrollerduringtheperformanceofvisuallyguidedupperlimbmovements
AT tungjames evaluationoftheleapmotioncontrollerduringtheperformanceofvisuallyguidedupperlimbmovements