Cargando…
Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse (BCEC) do not have effective curative treatment options. Hyperthermia, the elevation of tumor temperature to 40–45 °C, is a well-established radio- and chemotherapy sensitizer. A total of 196 patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7 |
_version_ | 1783305670296076288 |
---|---|
author | Oldenborg, Sabine Rasch, Coen R. N. van Os, Rob Kusumanto, Yoka H. Oei, Bing S. Venselaar, Jack L. Heymans, Martijn W. Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, Paul J. Crezee, Hans van Tienhoven, Geertjan |
author_facet | Oldenborg, Sabine Rasch, Coen R. N. van Os, Rob Kusumanto, Yoka H. Oei, Bing S. Venselaar, Jack L. Heymans, Martijn W. Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, Paul J. Crezee, Hans van Tienhoven, Geertjan |
author_sort | Oldenborg, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse (BCEC) do not have effective curative treatment options. Hyperthermia, the elevation of tumor temperature to 40–45 °C, is a well-established radio- and chemotherapy sensitizer. A total of 196 patients were treated with reirradiation and hyperthermia (reRT+HT) at two Dutch institutes from 1982–2005. The palliative effect was evaluated in terms of clinical outcome and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received previous irradiation to a median dose of 50 Gy. In all, 75% of patients received 1–6 treatment modalities for previous tumor recurrences. ReRT consisted of 8 × 4 Gy given twice a week or 12 × 3 Gy given four times a week. Superficial hyperthermia was added once or twice a week. Tumor area comprised ≥½ of the ipsilateral chest wall. RESULTS: Overall clinical response rate was 72% (complete response [CR] 30%, partial response [PR] 42%, stable disease [SD] 22%, progressive disease [PD] 6%). The local progression-free rate at 1 year was 24%. Median survival was 6.9 months. Forty-three percent of our patients with CR, PR, SD after treatment remained infield progression-free until death or last follow-up. Acute ≥grade 3 toxicity occurred in 33% of patients, while late ≥grade 3 toxicity was recorded in 14% of patients. Tumor ulceration prior to treatment had a negative impact on both clinical outcome and toxicity. CONCLUSION: ReRT+HT provides sustainable palliative tumor control, despite refractory, extensive tumor growth. Compared to currently available systemic treatment options, reRT+HT is more effective with less toxicity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5847022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58470222018-03-20 Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse Oldenborg, Sabine Rasch, Coen R. N. van Os, Rob Kusumanto, Yoka H. Oei, Bing S. Venselaar, Jack L. Heymans, Martijn W. Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, Paul J. Crezee, Hans van Tienhoven, Geertjan Strahlenther Onkol Original Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse (BCEC) do not have effective curative treatment options. Hyperthermia, the elevation of tumor temperature to 40–45 °C, is a well-established radio- and chemotherapy sensitizer. A total of 196 patients were treated with reirradiation and hyperthermia (reRT+HT) at two Dutch institutes from 1982–2005. The palliative effect was evaluated in terms of clinical outcome and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received previous irradiation to a median dose of 50 Gy. In all, 75% of patients received 1–6 treatment modalities for previous tumor recurrences. ReRT consisted of 8 × 4 Gy given twice a week or 12 × 3 Gy given four times a week. Superficial hyperthermia was added once or twice a week. Tumor area comprised ≥½ of the ipsilateral chest wall. RESULTS: Overall clinical response rate was 72% (complete response [CR] 30%, partial response [PR] 42%, stable disease [SD] 22%, progressive disease [PD] 6%). The local progression-free rate at 1 year was 24%. Median survival was 6.9 months. Forty-three percent of our patients with CR, PR, SD after treatment remained infield progression-free until death or last follow-up. Acute ≥grade 3 toxicity occurred in 33% of patients, while late ≥grade 3 toxicity was recorded in 14% of patients. Tumor ulceration prior to treatment had a negative impact on both clinical outcome and toxicity. CONCLUSION: ReRT+HT provides sustainable palliative tumor control, despite refractory, extensive tumor growth. Compared to currently available systemic treatment options, reRT+HT is more effective with less toxicity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-12-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5847022/ /pubmed/29264624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oldenborg, Sabine Rasch, Coen R. N. van Os, Rob Kusumanto, Yoka H. Oei, Bing S. Venselaar, Jack L. Heymans, Martijn W. Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, Paul J. Crezee, Hans van Tienhoven, Geertjan Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse |
title | Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse |
title_full | Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse |
title_fullStr | Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse |
title_full_unstemmed | Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse |
title_short | Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse |
title_sort | reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oldenborgsabine reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse AT raschcoenrn reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse AT vanosrob reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse AT kusumantoyokah reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse AT oeibings reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse AT venselaarjackl reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse AT heymansmartijnw reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse AT zumvordesivevordingpaulj reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse AT crezeehans reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse AT vantienhovengeertjan reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse |