Cargando…

Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse (BCEC) do not have effective curative treatment options. Hyperthermia, the elevation of tumor temperature to 40–45 °C, is a well-established radio- and chemotherapy sensitizer. A total of 196 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oldenborg, Sabine, Rasch, Coen R. N., van Os, Rob, Kusumanto, Yoka H., Oei, Bing S., Venselaar, Jack L., Heymans, Martijn W., Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, Paul J., Crezee, Hans, van Tienhoven, Geertjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7
_version_ 1783305670296076288
author Oldenborg, Sabine
Rasch, Coen R. N.
van Os, Rob
Kusumanto, Yoka H.
Oei, Bing S.
Venselaar, Jack L.
Heymans, Martijn W.
Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, Paul J.
Crezee, Hans
van Tienhoven, Geertjan
author_facet Oldenborg, Sabine
Rasch, Coen R. N.
van Os, Rob
Kusumanto, Yoka H.
Oei, Bing S.
Venselaar, Jack L.
Heymans, Martijn W.
Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, Paul J.
Crezee, Hans
van Tienhoven, Geertjan
author_sort Oldenborg, Sabine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse (BCEC) do not have effective curative treatment options. Hyperthermia, the elevation of tumor temperature to 40–45 °C, is a well-established radio- and chemotherapy sensitizer. A total of 196 patients were treated with reirradiation and hyperthermia (reRT+HT) at two Dutch institutes from 1982–2005. The palliative effect was evaluated in terms of clinical outcome and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received previous irradiation to a median dose of 50 Gy. In all, 75% of patients received 1–6 treatment modalities for previous tumor recurrences. ReRT consisted of 8 × 4 Gy given twice a week or 12 × 3 Gy given four times a week. Superficial hyperthermia was added once or twice a week. Tumor area comprised ≥½ of the ipsilateral chest wall. RESULTS: Overall clinical response rate was 72% (complete response [CR] 30%, partial response [PR] 42%, stable disease [SD] 22%, progressive disease [PD] 6%). The local progression-free rate at 1 year was 24%. Median survival was 6.9 months. Forty-three percent of our patients with CR, PR, SD after treatment remained infield progression-free until death or last follow-up. Acute ≥grade 3 toxicity occurred in 33% of patients, while late ≥grade 3 toxicity was recorded in 14% of patients. Tumor ulceration prior to treatment had a negative impact on both clinical outcome and toxicity. CONCLUSION: ReRT+HT provides sustainable palliative tumor control, despite refractory, extensive tumor growth. Compared to currently available systemic treatment options, reRT+HT is more effective with less toxicity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5847022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58470222018-03-20 Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse Oldenborg, Sabine Rasch, Coen R. N. van Os, Rob Kusumanto, Yoka H. Oei, Bing S. Venselaar, Jack L. Heymans, Martijn W. Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, Paul J. Crezee, Hans van Tienhoven, Geertjan Strahlenther Onkol Original Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse (BCEC) do not have effective curative treatment options. Hyperthermia, the elevation of tumor temperature to 40–45 °C, is a well-established radio- and chemotherapy sensitizer. A total of 196 patients were treated with reirradiation and hyperthermia (reRT+HT) at two Dutch institutes from 1982–2005. The palliative effect was evaluated in terms of clinical outcome and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received previous irradiation to a median dose of 50 Gy. In all, 75% of patients received 1–6 treatment modalities for previous tumor recurrences. ReRT consisted of 8 × 4 Gy given twice a week or 12 × 3 Gy given four times a week. Superficial hyperthermia was added once or twice a week. Tumor area comprised ≥½ of the ipsilateral chest wall. RESULTS: Overall clinical response rate was 72% (complete response [CR] 30%, partial response [PR] 42%, stable disease [SD] 22%, progressive disease [PD] 6%). The local progression-free rate at 1 year was 24%. Median survival was 6.9 months. Forty-three percent of our patients with CR, PR, SD after treatment remained infield progression-free until death or last follow-up. Acute ≥grade 3 toxicity occurred in 33% of patients, while late ≥grade 3 toxicity was recorded in 14% of patients. Tumor ulceration prior to treatment had a negative impact on both clinical outcome and toxicity. CONCLUSION: ReRT+HT provides sustainable palliative tumor control, despite refractory, extensive tumor growth. Compared to currently available systemic treatment options, reRT+HT is more effective with less toxicity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-12-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5847022/ /pubmed/29264624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Oldenborg, Sabine
Rasch, Coen R. N.
van Os, Rob
Kusumanto, Yoka H.
Oei, Bing S.
Venselaar, Jack L.
Heymans, Martijn W.
Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, Paul J.
Crezee, Hans
van Tienhoven, Geertjan
Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse
title Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse
title_full Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse
title_fullStr Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse
title_full_unstemmed Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse
title_short Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse
title_sort reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1241-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oldenborgsabine reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse
AT raschcoenrn reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse
AT vanosrob reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse
AT kusumantoyokah reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse
AT oeibings reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse
AT venselaarjackl reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse
AT heymansmartijnw reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse
AT zumvordesivevordingpaulj reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse
AT crezeehans reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse
AT vantienhovengeertjan reirradiationhyperthermiaforrecurrentbreastcancerencuirasse