Cargando…
Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes
PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used in breast cancer treatment. One of the main goals of NACT is to reduce the extent of local surgery of the breast and axilla. The aim of this study was to determine surgical outcomes for patients receiving breast-conserving therapy (BCT) a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29214416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4598-5 |
_version_ | 1783305677298466816 |
---|---|
author | Volders, José H. Negenborn, Vera L. Spronk, Pauline E. Krekel, Nicole M. A. Schoonmade, Linda J. Meijer, Sybren Rubio, Isabel T. van den Tol, M. Petrousjka |
author_facet | Volders, José H. Negenborn, Vera L. Spronk, Pauline E. Krekel, Nicole M. A. Schoonmade, Linda J. Meijer, Sybren Rubio, Isabel T. van den Tol, M. Petrousjka |
author_sort | Volders, José H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used in breast cancer treatment. One of the main goals of NACT is to reduce the extent of local surgery of the breast and axilla. The aim of this study was to determine surgical outcomes for patients receiving breast-conserving therapy (BCT) after NACT, including margin status plus secondary surgeries, excision volumes, and cosmetic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA principles. Pubmed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating the results of BCT following NACT. The main study outcomes were margin status, additional local therapies, excision volumes, and cosmetic outcomes. Non-comparative studies on NACT were also included. Exclusion criteria were studies with less than 25 patients, and studies excluding secondary mastectomy patients. FINDINGS: Of the 1219 studies screened, 26 studies were deemed eligible for analysis, including data from 5379 patients treated with NACT and 10,110 patients treated without NACT. Included studies showed wide ranges of tumor-involved margins (2–39.8%), secondary surgeries (0–45.4%), and excision volumes (43.2–268 cm(3)) or specimen weight (26.4–233 g) after NACT. Most studies were retrospective, with a high heterogeneity and a high risk of bias. Cosmetic outcomes after NACT were reported in two single-center cohort studies. Both studies showed acceptable cosmetic outcomes. INTERPRETATION: There is currently insufficient evidence to suggest that NACT improves surgical outcomes of BCT. It is imperative that clinical trials include patient outcome measures in order to allow monitoring and meaningful comparison of treatment outcomes in breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5847047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58470472018-03-20 Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes Volders, José H. Negenborn, Vera L. Spronk, Pauline E. Krekel, Nicole M. A. Schoonmade, Linda J. Meijer, Sybren Rubio, Isabel T. van den Tol, M. Petrousjka Breast Cancer Res Treat Review PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used in breast cancer treatment. One of the main goals of NACT is to reduce the extent of local surgery of the breast and axilla. The aim of this study was to determine surgical outcomes for patients receiving breast-conserving therapy (BCT) after NACT, including margin status plus secondary surgeries, excision volumes, and cosmetic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA principles. Pubmed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating the results of BCT following NACT. The main study outcomes were margin status, additional local therapies, excision volumes, and cosmetic outcomes. Non-comparative studies on NACT were also included. Exclusion criteria were studies with less than 25 patients, and studies excluding secondary mastectomy patients. FINDINGS: Of the 1219 studies screened, 26 studies were deemed eligible for analysis, including data from 5379 patients treated with NACT and 10,110 patients treated without NACT. Included studies showed wide ranges of tumor-involved margins (2–39.8%), secondary surgeries (0–45.4%), and excision volumes (43.2–268 cm(3)) or specimen weight (26.4–233 g) after NACT. Most studies were retrospective, with a high heterogeneity and a high risk of bias. Cosmetic outcomes after NACT were reported in two single-center cohort studies. Both studies showed acceptable cosmetic outcomes. INTERPRETATION: There is currently insufficient evidence to suggest that NACT improves surgical outcomes of BCT. It is imperative that clinical trials include patient outcome measures in order to allow monitoring and meaningful comparison of treatment outcomes in breast cancer. Springer US 2017-12-06 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5847047/ /pubmed/29214416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4598-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Volders, José H. Negenborn, Vera L. Spronk, Pauline E. Krekel, Nicole M. A. Schoonmade, Linda J. Meijer, Sybren Rubio, Isabel T. van den Tol, M. Petrousjka Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes |
title | Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes |
title_full | Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes |
title_fullStr | Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes |
title_short | Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes |
title_sort | breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29214416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4598-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voldersjoseh breastconservingsurgeryfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyasystematicreviewonsurgicaloutcomes AT negenbornveral breastconservingsurgeryfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyasystematicreviewonsurgicaloutcomes AT spronkpaulinee breastconservingsurgeryfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyasystematicreviewonsurgicaloutcomes AT krekelnicolema breastconservingsurgeryfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyasystematicreviewonsurgicaloutcomes AT schoonmadelindaj breastconservingsurgeryfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyasystematicreviewonsurgicaloutcomes AT meijersybren breastconservingsurgeryfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyasystematicreviewonsurgicaloutcomes AT rubioisabelt breastconservingsurgeryfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyasystematicreviewonsurgicaloutcomes AT vandentolmpetrousjka breastconservingsurgeryfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyasystematicreviewonsurgicaloutcomes |