Cargando…

A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations

To systematically review the evidence to determine the clinical outcomes and the important methodological quality features of interventional studies on adults with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain (MJP). Systematic search of published and unpublished literature using the databases: AMED, CINAHL, ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Comer, C., Smith, T. O., Drew, B., Raja, R., Kingsbury, S. R., Conaghan, Philip G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3876-1
_version_ 1783305682468995072
author Comer, C.
Smith, T. O.
Drew, B.
Raja, R.
Kingsbury, S. R.
Conaghan, Philip G.
author_facet Comer, C.
Smith, T. O.
Drew, B.
Raja, R.
Kingsbury, S. R.
Conaghan, Philip G.
author_sort Comer, C.
collection PubMed
description To systematically review the evidence to determine the clinical outcomes and the important methodological quality features of interventional studies on adults with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain (MJP). Systematic search of published and unpublished literature using the databases: AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, psycINFO, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, OpenGrey, the EU Clinical Trials Register, World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ISRCTN registry (search: inception to 19th October 2017). All papers reporting the clinical outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions for people with non-inflammatory MJP were included. Studies were critically appraised using the Downs and Black Critical Appraisal and the TIDieR reporting checklists. Data were analysed using a Best Evidence Synthesis approach. From 3824 citations, four papers satisfied the eligibility criteria. Three studies reported outcomes from multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes and one study reported the findings of a spa therapy intervention. All interventions significantly improved pain, function and quality of life in the short-term. There was limited reporting of measures for absenteeism, presenteeism and psychosocial outcomes. The evidence was ‘weak’, and due to a lack of controlled trials, there is limited evidence to ascertain treatment effectiveness. Design consideration for future trials surround improved reporting of participant characteristics, interventions and the standardisation of core outcome measures. There is insufficient high-quality trial data to determine the effectiveness of treatments for non-inflammatory MJP. Given the significant health burden which this condition presents on both individuals and wider society, developing and testing interventions and accurately reporting these, should be a research priority. Registration PROSPERO (CRD42013005888).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5847069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58470692018-03-20 A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations Comer, C. Smith, T. O. Drew, B. Raja, R. Kingsbury, S. R. Conaghan, Philip G. Rheumatol Int Systematic Review To systematically review the evidence to determine the clinical outcomes and the important methodological quality features of interventional studies on adults with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain (MJP). Systematic search of published and unpublished literature using the databases: AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, psycINFO, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, OpenGrey, the EU Clinical Trials Register, World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ISRCTN registry (search: inception to 19th October 2017). All papers reporting the clinical outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions for people with non-inflammatory MJP were included. Studies were critically appraised using the Downs and Black Critical Appraisal and the TIDieR reporting checklists. Data were analysed using a Best Evidence Synthesis approach. From 3824 citations, four papers satisfied the eligibility criteria. Three studies reported outcomes from multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes and one study reported the findings of a spa therapy intervention. All interventions significantly improved pain, function and quality of life in the short-term. There was limited reporting of measures for absenteeism, presenteeism and psychosocial outcomes. The evidence was ‘weak’, and due to a lack of controlled trials, there is limited evidence to ascertain treatment effectiveness. Design consideration for future trials surround improved reporting of participant characteristics, interventions and the standardisation of core outcome measures. There is insufficient high-quality trial data to determine the effectiveness of treatments for non-inflammatory MJP. Given the significant health burden which this condition presents on both individuals and wider society, developing and testing interventions and accurately reporting these, should be a research priority. Registration PROSPERO (CRD42013005888). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-11-16 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5847069/ /pubmed/29147758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3876-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Comer, C.
Smith, T. O.
Drew, B.
Raja, R.
Kingsbury, S. R.
Conaghan, Philip G.
A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations
title A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations
title_full A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations
title_fullStr A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations
title_short A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations
title_sort systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3876-1
work_keys_str_mv AT comerc asystematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT smithto asystematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT drewb asystematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT rajar asystematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT kingsburysr asystematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT conaghanphilipg asystematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT comerc systematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT smithto systematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT drewb systematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT rajar systematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT kingsburysr systematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations
AT conaghanphilipg systematicreviewassessingnonpharmacologicalconservativetreatmentstudiesforpeoplewithnoninflammatorymultijointpainclinicaloutcomesandresearchdesignconsiderations