Cargando…

Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future

As one of the most commonly read online sources of medical information, Wikipedia is an influential public health platform. Its medical content, community, collaborations and challenges have been evolving since its creation in 2001, and engagement by the medical community is vital for ensuring its a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shafee, Thomas, Masukume, Gwinyai, Kipersztok, Lisa, Das, Diptanshu, Häggström, Mikael, Heilman, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208601
_version_ 1783305686577315840
author Shafee, Thomas
Masukume, Gwinyai
Kipersztok, Lisa
Das, Diptanshu
Häggström, Mikael
Heilman, James
author_facet Shafee, Thomas
Masukume, Gwinyai
Kipersztok, Lisa
Das, Diptanshu
Häggström, Mikael
Heilman, James
author_sort Shafee, Thomas
collection PubMed
description As one of the most commonly read online sources of medical information, Wikipedia is an influential public health platform. Its medical content, community, collaborations and challenges have been evolving since its creation in 2001, and engagement by the medical community is vital for ensuring its accuracy and completeness. Both the encyclopaedia’s internal metrics as well as external assessments of its quality indicate that its articles are highly variable, but improving. Although content can be edited by anyone, medical articles are primarily written by a core group of medical professionals. Diverse collaborative ventures have enhanced medical article quality and reach, and opportunities for partnerships are more available than ever. Nevertheless, Wikipedia’s medical content and community still face significant challenges, and a socioecological model is used to structure specific recommendations. We propose that the medical community should prioritise the accuracy of biomedical information in the world’s most consulted encyclopaedia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5847101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58471012018-03-15 Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future Shafee, Thomas Masukume, Gwinyai Kipersztok, Lisa Das, Diptanshu Häggström, Mikael Heilman, James J Epidemiol Community Health Essay As one of the most commonly read online sources of medical information, Wikipedia is an influential public health platform. Its medical content, community, collaborations and challenges have been evolving since its creation in 2001, and engagement by the medical community is vital for ensuring its accuracy and completeness. Both the encyclopaedia’s internal metrics as well as external assessments of its quality indicate that its articles are highly variable, but improving. Although content can be edited by anyone, medical articles are primarily written by a core group of medical professionals. Diverse collaborative ventures have enhanced medical article quality and reach, and opportunities for partnerships are more available than ever. Nevertheless, Wikipedia’s medical content and community still face significant challenges, and a socioecological model is used to structure specific recommendations. We propose that the medical community should prioritise the accuracy of biomedical information in the world’s most consulted encyclopaedia. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11 2017-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5847101/ /pubmed/28847845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208601 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Essay
Shafee, Thomas
Masukume, Gwinyai
Kipersztok, Lisa
Das, Diptanshu
Häggström, Mikael
Heilman, James
Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
title Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
title_full Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
title_fullStr Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
title_short Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
title_sort evolution of wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
topic Essay
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208601
work_keys_str_mv AT shafeethomas evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture
AT masukumegwinyai evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture
AT kipersztoklisa evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture
AT dasdiptanshu evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture
AT haggstrommikael evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture
AT heilmanjames evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture