Cargando…
Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
As one of the most commonly read online sources of medical information, Wikipedia is an influential public health platform. Its medical content, community, collaborations and challenges have been evolving since its creation in 2001, and engagement by the medical community is vital for ensuring its a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208601 |
_version_ | 1783305686577315840 |
---|---|
author | Shafee, Thomas Masukume, Gwinyai Kipersztok, Lisa Das, Diptanshu Häggström, Mikael Heilman, James |
author_facet | Shafee, Thomas Masukume, Gwinyai Kipersztok, Lisa Das, Diptanshu Häggström, Mikael Heilman, James |
author_sort | Shafee, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | As one of the most commonly read online sources of medical information, Wikipedia is an influential public health platform. Its medical content, community, collaborations and challenges have been evolving since its creation in 2001, and engagement by the medical community is vital for ensuring its accuracy and completeness. Both the encyclopaedia’s internal metrics as well as external assessments of its quality indicate that its articles are highly variable, but improving. Although content can be edited by anyone, medical articles are primarily written by a core group of medical professionals. Diverse collaborative ventures have enhanced medical article quality and reach, and opportunities for partnerships are more available than ever. Nevertheless, Wikipedia’s medical content and community still face significant challenges, and a socioecological model is used to structure specific recommendations. We propose that the medical community should prioritise the accuracy of biomedical information in the world’s most consulted encyclopaedia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5847101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58471012018-03-15 Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future Shafee, Thomas Masukume, Gwinyai Kipersztok, Lisa Das, Diptanshu Häggström, Mikael Heilman, James J Epidemiol Community Health Essay As one of the most commonly read online sources of medical information, Wikipedia is an influential public health platform. Its medical content, community, collaborations and challenges have been evolving since its creation in 2001, and engagement by the medical community is vital for ensuring its accuracy and completeness. Both the encyclopaedia’s internal metrics as well as external assessments of its quality indicate that its articles are highly variable, but improving. Although content can be edited by anyone, medical articles are primarily written by a core group of medical professionals. Diverse collaborative ventures have enhanced medical article quality and reach, and opportunities for partnerships are more available than ever. Nevertheless, Wikipedia’s medical content and community still face significant challenges, and a socioecological model is used to structure specific recommendations. We propose that the medical community should prioritise the accuracy of biomedical information in the world’s most consulted encyclopaedia. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11 2017-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5847101/ /pubmed/28847845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208601 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Essay Shafee, Thomas Masukume, Gwinyai Kipersztok, Lisa Das, Diptanshu Häggström, Mikael Heilman, James Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future |
title | Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future |
title_full | Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future |
title_fullStr | Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future |
title_full_unstemmed | Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future |
title_short | Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future |
title_sort | evolution of wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future |
topic | Essay |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shafeethomas evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture AT masukumegwinyai evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture AT kipersztoklisa evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture AT dasdiptanshu evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture AT haggstrommikael evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture AT heilmanjames evolutionofwikipediasmedicalcontentpastpresentandfuture |