Cargando…
Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography
Parameters using myocardial strain analysis may predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). As the agreement between currently available strain imaging modalities is unknown, three different modalities were compared. Twenty-seven CRT-candidates, prospectively included in the MARC st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5 |
_version_ | 1783305710857093120 |
---|---|
author | van Everdingen, Wouter M. Zweerink, Alwin Nijveldt, Robin Salden, Odette A. E. Meine, Mathias Maass, Alexander H. Vernooy, Kevin De Lange, Frederik J. van Rossum, Albert C. Croisille, Pierre Clarysse, Patrick Geelhoed, Bastiaan Rienstra, Michiel Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Vos, Marc A. Allaart, Cornelis P. Cramer, Maarten J. |
author_facet | van Everdingen, Wouter M. Zweerink, Alwin Nijveldt, Robin Salden, Odette A. E. Meine, Mathias Maass, Alexander H. Vernooy, Kevin De Lange, Frederik J. van Rossum, Albert C. Croisille, Pierre Clarysse, Patrick Geelhoed, Bastiaan Rienstra, Michiel Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Vos, Marc A. Allaart, Cornelis P. Cramer, Maarten J. |
author_sort | van Everdingen, Wouter M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Parameters using myocardial strain analysis may predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). As the agreement between currently available strain imaging modalities is unknown, three different modalities were compared. Twenty-seven CRT-candidates, prospectively included in the MARC study, underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and echocardiographic examination. Left ventricular (LV) circumferential strain was analysed with CMR tagging (CMR-TAG), CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT), and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). Basic strain values and parameters of dyssynchrony and discoordination obtained with CMR-FT and STE were compared to CMR-TAG. Agreement of CMR-FT and CMR-TAG was overall fair, while agreement between STE and CMR-TAG was often poor. For both comparisons, agreement on discoordination parameters was highest, followed by dyssynchrony and basic strain parameters. For discoordination parameters, agreement on systolic stretch index was highest, with fair intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) (CMR-FT: 0.58, STE: 0.55). ICC of septal systolic rebound stretch (SRS(sept)) was poor (CMR-FT: 0.41, STE: 0.30). Internal stretch factor of septal and lateral wall (ISF(sep–lat)) showed fair ICC values (CMR-FT: 0.53, STE: 0.46), while the ICC of the total LV (ISF(LV)) was fair for CMR-FT (0.55) and poor for STE (ICC: 0.32). The CURE index had a fair ICC for both comparisons (CMR-FT: 0.49, STE 0.41). Although comparison of STE to CMR-TAG was limited by methodological differences, agreement between CMR-FT and CMR-TAG was overall higher compared to STE and CMR-TAG. CMR-FT is a potential clinical alternative for CMR-TAG and STE, especially in the detection of discoordination in CRT-candidates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5847211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58472112018-03-20 Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography van Everdingen, Wouter M. Zweerink, Alwin Nijveldt, Robin Salden, Odette A. E. Meine, Mathias Maass, Alexander H. Vernooy, Kevin De Lange, Frederik J. van Rossum, Albert C. Croisille, Pierre Clarysse, Patrick Geelhoed, Bastiaan Rienstra, Michiel Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Vos, Marc A. Allaart, Cornelis P. Cramer, Maarten J. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Parameters using myocardial strain analysis may predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). As the agreement between currently available strain imaging modalities is unknown, three different modalities were compared. Twenty-seven CRT-candidates, prospectively included in the MARC study, underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and echocardiographic examination. Left ventricular (LV) circumferential strain was analysed with CMR tagging (CMR-TAG), CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT), and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). Basic strain values and parameters of dyssynchrony and discoordination obtained with CMR-FT and STE were compared to CMR-TAG. Agreement of CMR-FT and CMR-TAG was overall fair, while agreement between STE and CMR-TAG was often poor. For both comparisons, agreement on discoordination parameters was highest, followed by dyssynchrony and basic strain parameters. For discoordination parameters, agreement on systolic stretch index was highest, with fair intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) (CMR-FT: 0.58, STE: 0.55). ICC of septal systolic rebound stretch (SRS(sept)) was poor (CMR-FT: 0.41, STE: 0.30). Internal stretch factor of septal and lateral wall (ISF(sep–lat)) showed fair ICC values (CMR-FT: 0.53, STE: 0.46), while the ICC of the total LV (ISF(LV)) was fair for CMR-FT (0.55) and poor for STE (ICC: 0.32). The CURE index had a fair ICC for both comparisons (CMR-FT: 0.49, STE 0.41). Although comparison of STE to CMR-TAG was limited by methodological differences, agreement between CMR-FT and CMR-TAG was overall higher compared to STE and CMR-TAG. CMR-FT is a potential clinical alternative for CMR-TAG and STE, especially in the detection of discoordination in CRT-candidates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2017-10-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5847211/ /pubmed/29043465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper van Everdingen, Wouter M. Zweerink, Alwin Nijveldt, Robin Salden, Odette A. E. Meine, Mathias Maass, Alexander H. Vernooy, Kevin De Lange, Frederik J. van Rossum, Albert C. Croisille, Pierre Clarysse, Patrick Geelhoed, Bastiaan Rienstra, Michiel Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Vos, Marc A. Allaart, Cornelis P. Cramer, Maarten J. Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography |
title | Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography |
title_full | Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography |
title_fullStr | Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography |
title_short | Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography |
title_sort | comparison of strain imaging techniques in crt candidates: cmr tagging, cmr feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaneverdingenwouterm comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT zweerinkalwin comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT nijveldtrobin comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT saldenodetteae comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT meinemathias comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT maassalexanderh comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT vernooykevin comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT delangefrederikj comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT vanrossumalbertc comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT croisillepierre comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT claryssepatrick comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT geelhoedbastiaan comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT rienstramichiel comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT vangelderisabellec comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT vosmarca comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT allaartcornelisp comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography AT cramermaartenj comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography |