Cargando…

Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography

Parameters using myocardial strain analysis may predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). As the agreement between currently available strain imaging modalities is unknown, three different modalities were compared. Twenty-seven CRT-candidates, prospectively included in the MARC st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Everdingen, Wouter M., Zweerink, Alwin, Nijveldt, Robin, Salden, Odette A. E., Meine, Mathias, Maass, Alexander H., Vernooy, Kevin, De Lange, Frederik J., van Rossum, Albert C., Croisille, Pierre, Clarysse, Patrick, Geelhoed, Bastiaan, Rienstra, Michiel, Van Gelder, Isabelle C., Vos, Marc A., Allaart, Cornelis P., Cramer, Maarten J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5
_version_ 1783305710857093120
author van Everdingen, Wouter M.
Zweerink, Alwin
Nijveldt, Robin
Salden, Odette A. E.
Meine, Mathias
Maass, Alexander H.
Vernooy, Kevin
De Lange, Frederik J.
van Rossum, Albert C.
Croisille, Pierre
Clarysse, Patrick
Geelhoed, Bastiaan
Rienstra, Michiel
Van Gelder, Isabelle C.
Vos, Marc A.
Allaart, Cornelis P.
Cramer, Maarten J.
author_facet van Everdingen, Wouter M.
Zweerink, Alwin
Nijveldt, Robin
Salden, Odette A. E.
Meine, Mathias
Maass, Alexander H.
Vernooy, Kevin
De Lange, Frederik J.
van Rossum, Albert C.
Croisille, Pierre
Clarysse, Patrick
Geelhoed, Bastiaan
Rienstra, Michiel
Van Gelder, Isabelle C.
Vos, Marc A.
Allaart, Cornelis P.
Cramer, Maarten J.
author_sort van Everdingen, Wouter M.
collection PubMed
description Parameters using myocardial strain analysis may predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). As the agreement between currently available strain imaging modalities is unknown, three different modalities were compared. Twenty-seven CRT-candidates, prospectively included in the MARC study, underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and echocardiographic examination. Left ventricular (LV) circumferential strain was analysed with CMR tagging (CMR-TAG), CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT), and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). Basic strain values and parameters of dyssynchrony and discoordination obtained with CMR-FT and STE were compared to CMR-TAG. Agreement of CMR-FT and CMR-TAG was overall fair, while agreement between STE and CMR-TAG was often poor. For both comparisons, agreement on discoordination parameters was highest, followed by dyssynchrony and basic strain parameters. For discoordination parameters, agreement on systolic stretch index was highest, with fair intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) (CMR-FT: 0.58, STE: 0.55). ICC of septal systolic rebound stretch (SRS(sept)) was poor (CMR-FT: 0.41, STE: 0.30). Internal stretch factor of septal and lateral wall (ISF(sep–lat)) showed fair ICC values (CMR-FT: 0.53, STE: 0.46), while the ICC of the total LV (ISF(LV)) was fair for CMR-FT (0.55) and poor for STE (ICC: 0.32). The CURE index had a fair ICC for both comparisons (CMR-FT: 0.49, STE 0.41). Although comparison of STE to CMR-TAG was limited by methodological differences, agreement between CMR-FT and CMR-TAG was overall higher compared to STE and CMR-TAG. CMR-FT is a potential clinical alternative for CMR-TAG and STE, especially in the detection of discoordination in CRT-candidates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5847211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58472112018-03-20 Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography van Everdingen, Wouter M. Zweerink, Alwin Nijveldt, Robin Salden, Odette A. E. Meine, Mathias Maass, Alexander H. Vernooy, Kevin De Lange, Frederik J. van Rossum, Albert C. Croisille, Pierre Clarysse, Patrick Geelhoed, Bastiaan Rienstra, Michiel Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Vos, Marc A. Allaart, Cornelis P. Cramer, Maarten J. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Parameters using myocardial strain analysis may predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). As the agreement between currently available strain imaging modalities is unknown, three different modalities were compared. Twenty-seven CRT-candidates, prospectively included in the MARC study, underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and echocardiographic examination. Left ventricular (LV) circumferential strain was analysed with CMR tagging (CMR-TAG), CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT), and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). Basic strain values and parameters of dyssynchrony and discoordination obtained with CMR-FT and STE were compared to CMR-TAG. Agreement of CMR-FT and CMR-TAG was overall fair, while agreement between STE and CMR-TAG was often poor. For both comparisons, agreement on discoordination parameters was highest, followed by dyssynchrony and basic strain parameters. For discoordination parameters, agreement on systolic stretch index was highest, with fair intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) (CMR-FT: 0.58, STE: 0.55). ICC of septal systolic rebound stretch (SRS(sept)) was poor (CMR-FT: 0.41, STE: 0.30). Internal stretch factor of septal and lateral wall (ISF(sep–lat)) showed fair ICC values (CMR-FT: 0.53, STE: 0.46), while the ICC of the total LV (ISF(LV)) was fair for CMR-FT (0.55) and poor for STE (ICC: 0.32). The CURE index had a fair ICC for both comparisons (CMR-FT: 0.49, STE 0.41). Although comparison of STE to CMR-TAG was limited by methodological differences, agreement between CMR-FT and CMR-TAG was overall higher compared to STE and CMR-TAG. CMR-FT is a potential clinical alternative for CMR-TAG and STE, especially in the detection of discoordination in CRT-candidates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2017-10-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5847211/ /pubmed/29043465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
van Everdingen, Wouter M.
Zweerink, Alwin
Nijveldt, Robin
Salden, Odette A. E.
Meine, Mathias
Maass, Alexander H.
Vernooy, Kevin
De Lange, Frederik J.
van Rossum, Albert C.
Croisille, Pierre
Clarysse, Patrick
Geelhoed, Bastiaan
Rienstra, Michiel
Van Gelder, Isabelle C.
Vos, Marc A.
Allaart, Cornelis P.
Cramer, Maarten J.
Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography
title Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography
title_full Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography
title_fullStr Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography
title_short Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography
title_sort comparison of strain imaging techniques in crt candidates: cmr tagging, cmr feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5847211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1253-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vaneverdingenwouterm comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT zweerinkalwin comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT nijveldtrobin comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT saldenodetteae comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT meinemathias comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT maassalexanderh comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT vernooykevin comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT delangefrederikj comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT vanrossumalbertc comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT croisillepierre comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT claryssepatrick comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT geelhoedbastiaan comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT rienstramichiel comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT vangelderisabellec comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT vosmarca comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT allaartcornelisp comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT cramermaartenj comparisonofstrainimagingtechniquesincrtcandidatescmrtaggingcmrfeaturetrackingandspeckletrackingechocardiography