Cargando…
Rethinking the extrinsic incubation period of malaria parasites
The time it takes for malaria parasites to develop within a mosquito, and become transmissible, is known as the extrinsic incubation period, or EIP. EIP is a key parameter influencing transmission intensity as it combines with mosquito mortality rate and competence to determine the number of mosquit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2761-4 |
_version_ | 1783305880352063488 |
---|---|
author | Ohm, Johanna R. Baldini, Francesco Barreaux, Priscille Lefevre, Thierry Lynch, Penelope A. Suh, Eunho Whitehead, Shelley A. Thomas, Matthew B. |
author_facet | Ohm, Johanna R. Baldini, Francesco Barreaux, Priscille Lefevre, Thierry Lynch, Penelope A. Suh, Eunho Whitehead, Shelley A. Thomas, Matthew B. |
author_sort | Ohm, Johanna R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The time it takes for malaria parasites to develop within a mosquito, and become transmissible, is known as the extrinsic incubation period, or EIP. EIP is a key parameter influencing transmission intensity as it combines with mosquito mortality rate and competence to determine the number of mosquitoes that ultimately become infectious. In spite of its epidemiological significance, data on EIP are scant. Current approaches to estimate EIP are largely based on temperature-dependent models developed from data collected on parasite development within a single mosquito species in the 1930s. These models assume that the only factor affecting EIP is mean environmental temperature. Here, we review evidence to suggest that in addition to mean temperature, EIP is likely influenced by genetic diversity of the vector, diversity of the parasite, and variation in a range of biotic and abiotic factors that affect mosquito condition. We further demonstrate that the classic approach of measuring EIP as the time at which mosquitoes first become infectious likely misrepresents EIP for a mosquito population. We argue for a better understanding of EIP to improve models of transmission, refine predictions of the possible impacts of climate change, and determine the potential evolutionary responses of malaria parasites to current and future mosquito control tools. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2761-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5848458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58484582018-03-21 Rethinking the extrinsic incubation period of malaria parasites Ohm, Johanna R. Baldini, Francesco Barreaux, Priscille Lefevre, Thierry Lynch, Penelope A. Suh, Eunho Whitehead, Shelley A. Thomas, Matthew B. Parasit Vectors Review The time it takes for malaria parasites to develop within a mosquito, and become transmissible, is known as the extrinsic incubation period, or EIP. EIP is a key parameter influencing transmission intensity as it combines with mosquito mortality rate and competence to determine the number of mosquitoes that ultimately become infectious. In spite of its epidemiological significance, data on EIP are scant. Current approaches to estimate EIP are largely based on temperature-dependent models developed from data collected on parasite development within a single mosquito species in the 1930s. These models assume that the only factor affecting EIP is mean environmental temperature. Here, we review evidence to suggest that in addition to mean temperature, EIP is likely influenced by genetic diversity of the vector, diversity of the parasite, and variation in a range of biotic and abiotic factors that affect mosquito condition. We further demonstrate that the classic approach of measuring EIP as the time at which mosquitoes first become infectious likely misrepresents EIP for a mosquito population. We argue for a better understanding of EIP to improve models of transmission, refine predictions of the possible impacts of climate change, and determine the potential evolutionary responses of malaria parasites to current and future mosquito control tools. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2761-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5848458/ /pubmed/29530073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2761-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Ohm, Johanna R. Baldini, Francesco Barreaux, Priscille Lefevre, Thierry Lynch, Penelope A. Suh, Eunho Whitehead, Shelley A. Thomas, Matthew B. Rethinking the extrinsic incubation period of malaria parasites |
title | Rethinking the extrinsic incubation period of malaria parasites |
title_full | Rethinking the extrinsic incubation period of malaria parasites |
title_fullStr | Rethinking the extrinsic incubation period of malaria parasites |
title_full_unstemmed | Rethinking the extrinsic incubation period of malaria parasites |
title_short | Rethinking the extrinsic incubation period of malaria parasites |
title_sort | rethinking the extrinsic incubation period of malaria parasites |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2761-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohmjohannar rethinkingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariaparasites AT baldinifrancesco rethinkingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariaparasites AT barreauxpriscille rethinkingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariaparasites AT lefevrethierry rethinkingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariaparasites AT lynchpenelopea rethinkingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariaparasites AT suheunho rethinkingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariaparasites AT whiteheadshelleya rethinkingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariaparasites AT thomasmatthewb rethinkingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariaparasites |