Cargando…

The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice

BACKGROUND: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is the most prevalent form of acquired hearing loss and affects about 40 million US adults. Among the suggested therapeutics tested in rodents, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) has been shown to be otoprotective from NIHL; however, these results we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milon, Béatrice, Mitra, Sunayana, Song, Yang, Margulies, Zachary, Casserly, Ryan, Drake, Virginia, Mong, Jessica A., Depireux, Didier A., Hertzano, Ronna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0171-0
_version_ 1783305883167490048
author Milon, Béatrice
Mitra, Sunayana
Song, Yang
Margulies, Zachary
Casserly, Ryan
Drake, Virginia
Mong, Jessica A.
Depireux, Didier A.
Hertzano, Ronna
author_facet Milon, Béatrice
Mitra, Sunayana
Song, Yang
Margulies, Zachary
Casserly, Ryan
Drake, Virginia
Mong, Jessica A.
Depireux, Didier A.
Hertzano, Ronna
author_sort Milon, Béatrice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is the most prevalent form of acquired hearing loss and affects about 40 million US adults. Among the suggested therapeutics tested in rodents, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) has been shown to be otoprotective from NIHL; however, these results were limited to male mice. METHODS: Here we tested the effect of SAHA on the hearing of 10-week-old B6CBAF1/J mice of both sexes, which were exposed to 2 h of octave-band noise (101 dB SPL centered at 11.3 kHz). Hearing was assessed by measuring auditory brainstem responses (ABR) at 8, 16, 24, and 32 kHz, 1 week before, as well as at 24 h and 15–21 days following exposure (baseline, compound threshold shift (CTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS), respectively), followed by histologic analyses. RESULTS: We found significant differences in the CTS and PTS of the control (vehicle injected) mice to noise, where females had a significantly smaller CTS at 16 and 24 kHz (p < 0.0001) and PTS at 16, 24, and 32 kHz (16 and 24 kHz p < 0.001, 32 kHz p < 0.01). This sexual dimorphic effect could not be explained by a differential loss of sensory cells or synapses but was reflected in the amplitude and amplitude progression of wave I of the ABR, which correlates with outer hair cell (OHC) function. Finally, the frequency of the protective effect of SAHA differed significantly between males (PTS, 24 kHz, p = 0.002) and females (PTS, 16 kHz, p = 0.003), and the magnitude of the protection was smaller in females than in males. Importantly, the magnitude of the protection by SAHA was smaller than the effect of sex as a biological factor in the vehicle-injected mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that female mice are significantly protected from NIHL in comparison to males and that therapeutics for NIHL may have a different effect in males and females. The data highlight the importance of analyzing NIHL experiments from males and females, separately. Finally, these data also raise the possibility of effectors in the estrogen signaling pathway as novel therapeutics for NIHL. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13293-018-0171-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5848513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58485132018-03-21 The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice Milon, Béatrice Mitra, Sunayana Song, Yang Margulies, Zachary Casserly, Ryan Drake, Virginia Mong, Jessica A. Depireux, Didier A. Hertzano, Ronna Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is the most prevalent form of acquired hearing loss and affects about 40 million US adults. Among the suggested therapeutics tested in rodents, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) has been shown to be otoprotective from NIHL; however, these results were limited to male mice. METHODS: Here we tested the effect of SAHA on the hearing of 10-week-old B6CBAF1/J mice of both sexes, which were exposed to 2 h of octave-band noise (101 dB SPL centered at 11.3 kHz). Hearing was assessed by measuring auditory brainstem responses (ABR) at 8, 16, 24, and 32 kHz, 1 week before, as well as at 24 h and 15–21 days following exposure (baseline, compound threshold shift (CTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS), respectively), followed by histologic analyses. RESULTS: We found significant differences in the CTS and PTS of the control (vehicle injected) mice to noise, where females had a significantly smaller CTS at 16 and 24 kHz (p < 0.0001) and PTS at 16, 24, and 32 kHz (16 and 24 kHz p < 0.001, 32 kHz p < 0.01). This sexual dimorphic effect could not be explained by a differential loss of sensory cells or synapses but was reflected in the amplitude and amplitude progression of wave I of the ABR, which correlates with outer hair cell (OHC) function. Finally, the frequency of the protective effect of SAHA differed significantly between males (PTS, 24 kHz, p = 0.002) and females (PTS, 16 kHz, p = 0.003), and the magnitude of the protection was smaller in females than in males. Importantly, the magnitude of the protection by SAHA was smaller than the effect of sex as a biological factor in the vehicle-injected mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that female mice are significantly protected from NIHL in comparison to males and that therapeutics for NIHL may have a different effect in males and females. The data highlight the importance of analyzing NIHL experiments from males and females, separately. Finally, these data also raise the possibility of effectors in the estrogen signaling pathway as novel therapeutics for NIHL. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13293-018-0171-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5848513/ /pubmed/29530094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0171-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Milon, Béatrice
Mitra, Sunayana
Song, Yang
Margulies, Zachary
Casserly, Ryan
Drake, Virginia
Mong, Jessica A.
Depireux, Didier A.
Hertzano, Ronna
The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice
title The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice
title_full The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice
title_fullStr The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice
title_full_unstemmed The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice
title_short The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice
title_sort impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0171-0
work_keys_str_mv AT milonbeatrice theimpactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT mitrasunayana theimpactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT songyang theimpactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT margulieszachary theimpactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT casserlyryan theimpactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT drakevirginia theimpactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT mongjessicaa theimpactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT depireuxdidiera theimpactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT hertzanoronna theimpactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT milonbeatrice impactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT mitrasunayana impactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT songyang impactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT margulieszachary impactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT casserlyryan impactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT drakevirginia impactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT mongjessicaa impactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT depireuxdidiera impactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice
AT hertzanoronna impactofbiologicalsexontheresponsetonoiseandotoprotectivetherapiesagainstacousticinjuryinmice