Cargando…

Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific

The very small fraction of putative binding sites (BSs) that are occupied by transcription factors (TFs) in vivo can be highly variable across different cell types. This observation has been partly attributed to changes in chromatin accessibility and histone modification (HM) patterns surrounding BS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xin, Beibei, Rohs, Remo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.220079.116
_version_ 1783305906261327872
author Xin, Beibei
Rohs, Remo
author_facet Xin, Beibei
Rohs, Remo
author_sort Xin, Beibei
collection PubMed
description The very small fraction of putative binding sites (BSs) that are occupied by transcription factors (TFs) in vivo can be highly variable across different cell types. This observation has been partly attributed to changes in chromatin accessibility and histone modification (HM) patterns surrounding BSs. Previous studies focusing on BSs within DNA regulatory regions found correlations between HM patterns and TF binding specificities. However, a mechanistic understanding of TF–DNA binding specificity determinants is still not available. The ability to predict in vivo TF binding on a genome-wide scale requires the identification of features that determine TF binding based on evolutionary relationships of DNA binding proteins. To reveal protein family–dependent mechanisms of TF binding, we conducted comprehensive comparisons of HM patterns surrounding BSs and non-BSs with exactly matched core motifs for TFs in three cell lines: 33 TFs in GM12878, 37 TFs in K562, and 18 TFs in H1-hESC. These TFs displayed protein family–specific preferences for HM patterns surrounding BSs, with high agreement among cell lines. Moreover, compared to models based on DNA sequence and shape at flanking regions of BSs, HM-augmented quantitative machine-learning methods resulted in increased performance in a TF family–specific manner. Analysis of the relative importance of features in these models indicated that TFs, displaying larger HM pattern differences between BSs and non-BSs, bound DNA in an HM-specific manner on a protein family–specific basis. We propose that TF family–specific HM preferences reveal distinct mechanisms that assist in guiding TFs to their cognate BSs by altering chromatin structure and accessibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5848611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58486112018-03-20 Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific Xin, Beibei Rohs, Remo Genome Res Research The very small fraction of putative binding sites (BSs) that are occupied by transcription factors (TFs) in vivo can be highly variable across different cell types. This observation has been partly attributed to changes in chromatin accessibility and histone modification (HM) patterns surrounding BSs. Previous studies focusing on BSs within DNA regulatory regions found correlations between HM patterns and TF binding specificities. However, a mechanistic understanding of TF–DNA binding specificity determinants is still not available. The ability to predict in vivo TF binding on a genome-wide scale requires the identification of features that determine TF binding based on evolutionary relationships of DNA binding proteins. To reveal protein family–dependent mechanisms of TF binding, we conducted comprehensive comparisons of HM patterns surrounding BSs and non-BSs with exactly matched core motifs for TFs in three cell lines: 33 TFs in GM12878, 37 TFs in K562, and 18 TFs in H1-hESC. These TFs displayed protein family–specific preferences for HM patterns surrounding BSs, with high agreement among cell lines. Moreover, compared to models based on DNA sequence and shape at flanking regions of BSs, HM-augmented quantitative machine-learning methods resulted in increased performance in a TF family–specific manner. Analysis of the relative importance of features in these models indicated that TFs, displaying larger HM pattern differences between BSs and non-BSs, bound DNA in an HM-specific manner on a protein family–specific basis. We propose that TF family–specific HM preferences reveal distinct mechanisms that assist in guiding TFs to their cognate BSs by altering chromatin structure and accessibility. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5848611/ /pubmed/29326300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.220079.116 Text en © 2018 Xin and Rohs; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Xin, Beibei
Rohs, Remo
Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific
title Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific
title_full Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific
title_fullStr Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific
title_short Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific
title_sort relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.220079.116
work_keys_str_mv AT xinbeibei relationshipbetweenhistonemodificationsandtranscriptionfactorbindingisproteinfamilyspecific
AT rohsremo relationshipbetweenhistonemodificationsandtranscriptionfactorbindingisproteinfamilyspecific