Cargando…

Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis†

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new bovine stented aortic valve bioprosthesis (Avalus™). METHODS: The PERIGON Pivotal Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study. Subjects had symptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis or chronic,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klautz, Robert J.M., Kappetein, A. Pieter, Lange, Rüdiger, Dagenais, Francois, Labrousse, Louis, Bapat, Vinayak, Moront, Michael, Misfeld, Martin, Zeng, Cathy, Sabik III, Joseph F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28475690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx066
_version_ 1783305943040131072
author Klautz, Robert J.M.
Kappetein, A. Pieter
Lange, Rüdiger
Dagenais, Francois
Labrousse, Louis
Bapat, Vinayak
Moront, Michael
Misfeld, Martin
Zeng, Cathy
Sabik III, Joseph F.
author_facet Klautz, Robert J.M.
Kappetein, A. Pieter
Lange, Rüdiger
Dagenais, Francois
Labrousse, Louis
Bapat, Vinayak
Moront, Michael
Misfeld, Martin
Zeng, Cathy
Sabik III, Joseph F.
author_sort Klautz, Robert J.M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new bovine stented aortic valve bioprosthesis (Avalus™). METHODS: The PERIGON Pivotal Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study. Subjects had symptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis or chronic, severe aortic regurgitation. Death, valve-related adverse events (AEs), functional recovery and haemodynamic performance were assessed at discharge, 3–6 months and 1 year. The primary analysis compared ‘late’ (>30 days post-implant) linearized rates of valve-related thromboembolism, thrombosis, all and major haemorrhage, all and major paravalvular leak (PVL) and endocarditis after implantation with objective performance criteria (OPC) for AEs, in accordance with EN ISO 5840:2009. We hypothesized that the upper 95% confidence bounds of the true linearized AE rates would be ≥ 2 × OPC; rejection of the null hypothesis would demonstrate that these rates were below acceptable rates. The analysis was required to include at least 150 patients followed to 1 year and 400 valve-years. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Total number of valve-years was 459.5 (n = 686). Linearized rates were <2 × OPC for death and valve-related thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, all and major PVL, and endocarditis, but ≥2 × OPC for all and major haemorrhage. Survival at 1 year (n = 270) was 96.4%. Patients showed good functional recovery, and haemodynamic performance was within expected range. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated a good safety profile and clinical effectiveness of the Avalus valve except for bleeding rates. The linearized rates of all and major haemorrhage may be related to long-term anticoagulation for non-valvular indications and the length of follow-up of this cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02088554 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5848807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58488072018-03-21 Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis† Klautz, Robert J.M. Kappetein, A. Pieter Lange, Rüdiger Dagenais, Francois Labrousse, Louis Bapat, Vinayak Moront, Michael Misfeld, Martin Zeng, Cathy Sabik III, Joseph F. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg General Adult Cardiac OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new bovine stented aortic valve bioprosthesis (Avalus™). METHODS: The PERIGON Pivotal Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study. Subjects had symptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis or chronic, severe aortic regurgitation. Death, valve-related adverse events (AEs), functional recovery and haemodynamic performance were assessed at discharge, 3–6 months and 1 year. The primary analysis compared ‘late’ (>30 days post-implant) linearized rates of valve-related thromboembolism, thrombosis, all and major haemorrhage, all and major paravalvular leak (PVL) and endocarditis after implantation with objective performance criteria (OPC) for AEs, in accordance with EN ISO 5840:2009. We hypothesized that the upper 95% confidence bounds of the true linearized AE rates would be ≥ 2 × OPC; rejection of the null hypothesis would demonstrate that these rates were below acceptable rates. The analysis was required to include at least 150 patients followed to 1 year and 400 valve-years. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Total number of valve-years was 459.5 (n = 686). Linearized rates were <2 × OPC for death and valve-related thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, all and major PVL, and endocarditis, but ≥2 × OPC for all and major haemorrhage. Survival at 1 year (n = 270) was 96.4%. Patients showed good functional recovery, and haemodynamic performance was within expected range. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated a good safety profile and clinical effectiveness of the Avalus valve except for bleeding rates. The linearized rates of all and major haemorrhage may be related to long-term anticoagulation for non-valvular indications and the length of follow-up of this cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02088554 (www.clinicaltrials.gov). Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5848807/ /pubmed/28475690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx066 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle General Adult Cardiac
Klautz, Robert J.M.
Kappetein, A. Pieter
Lange, Rüdiger
Dagenais, Francois
Labrousse, Louis
Bapat, Vinayak
Moront, Michael
Misfeld, Martin
Zeng, Cathy
Sabik III, Joseph F.
Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis†
title Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis†
title_full Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis†
title_fullStr Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis†
title_full_unstemmed Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis†
title_short Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis†
title_sort safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis†
topic General Adult Cardiac
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28475690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx066
work_keys_str_mv AT klautzrobertjm safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT kappeteinapieter safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT langerudiger safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT dagenaisfrancois safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT labrousselouis safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT bapatvinayak safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT morontmichael safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT misfeldmartin safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT zengcathy safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT sabikiiijosephf safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis
AT safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis