Cargando…
Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis†
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new bovine stented aortic valve bioprosthesis (Avalus™). METHODS: The PERIGON Pivotal Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study. Subjects had symptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis or chronic,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28475690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx066 |
_version_ | 1783305943040131072 |
---|---|
author | Klautz, Robert J.M. Kappetein, A. Pieter Lange, Rüdiger Dagenais, Francois Labrousse, Louis Bapat, Vinayak Moront, Michael Misfeld, Martin Zeng, Cathy Sabik III, Joseph F. |
author_facet | Klautz, Robert J.M. Kappetein, A. Pieter Lange, Rüdiger Dagenais, Francois Labrousse, Louis Bapat, Vinayak Moront, Michael Misfeld, Martin Zeng, Cathy Sabik III, Joseph F. |
author_sort | Klautz, Robert J.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new bovine stented aortic valve bioprosthesis (Avalus™). METHODS: The PERIGON Pivotal Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study. Subjects had symptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis or chronic, severe aortic regurgitation. Death, valve-related adverse events (AEs), functional recovery and haemodynamic performance were assessed at discharge, 3–6 months and 1 year. The primary analysis compared ‘late’ (>30 days post-implant) linearized rates of valve-related thromboembolism, thrombosis, all and major haemorrhage, all and major paravalvular leak (PVL) and endocarditis after implantation with objective performance criteria (OPC) for AEs, in accordance with EN ISO 5840:2009. We hypothesized that the upper 95% confidence bounds of the true linearized AE rates would be ≥ 2 × OPC; rejection of the null hypothesis would demonstrate that these rates were below acceptable rates. The analysis was required to include at least 150 patients followed to 1 year and 400 valve-years. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Total number of valve-years was 459.5 (n = 686). Linearized rates were <2 × OPC for death and valve-related thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, all and major PVL, and endocarditis, but ≥2 × OPC for all and major haemorrhage. Survival at 1 year (n = 270) was 96.4%. Patients showed good functional recovery, and haemodynamic performance was within expected range. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated a good safety profile and clinical effectiveness of the Avalus valve except for bleeding rates. The linearized rates of all and major haemorrhage may be related to long-term anticoagulation for non-valvular indications and the length of follow-up of this cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02088554 (www.clinicaltrials.gov). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5848807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58488072018-03-21 Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis† Klautz, Robert J.M. Kappetein, A. Pieter Lange, Rüdiger Dagenais, Francois Labrousse, Louis Bapat, Vinayak Moront, Michael Misfeld, Martin Zeng, Cathy Sabik III, Joseph F. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg General Adult Cardiac OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new bovine stented aortic valve bioprosthesis (Avalus™). METHODS: The PERIGON Pivotal Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study. Subjects had symptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis or chronic, severe aortic regurgitation. Death, valve-related adverse events (AEs), functional recovery and haemodynamic performance were assessed at discharge, 3–6 months and 1 year. The primary analysis compared ‘late’ (>30 days post-implant) linearized rates of valve-related thromboembolism, thrombosis, all and major haemorrhage, all and major paravalvular leak (PVL) and endocarditis after implantation with objective performance criteria (OPC) for AEs, in accordance with EN ISO 5840:2009. We hypothesized that the upper 95% confidence bounds of the true linearized AE rates would be ≥ 2 × OPC; rejection of the null hypothesis would demonstrate that these rates were below acceptable rates. The analysis was required to include at least 150 patients followed to 1 year and 400 valve-years. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Total number of valve-years was 459.5 (n = 686). Linearized rates were <2 × OPC for death and valve-related thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, all and major PVL, and endocarditis, but ≥2 × OPC for all and major haemorrhage. Survival at 1 year (n = 270) was 96.4%. Patients showed good functional recovery, and haemodynamic performance was within expected range. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated a good safety profile and clinical effectiveness of the Avalus valve except for bleeding rates. The linearized rates of all and major haemorrhage may be related to long-term anticoagulation for non-valvular indications and the length of follow-up of this cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02088554 (www.clinicaltrials.gov). Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5848807/ /pubmed/28475690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx066 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | General Adult Cardiac Klautz, Robert J.M. Kappetein, A. Pieter Lange, Rüdiger Dagenais, Francois Labrousse, Louis Bapat, Vinayak Moront, Michael Misfeld, Martin Zeng, Cathy Sabik III, Joseph F. Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis† |
title | Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis† |
title_full | Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis† |
title_fullStr | Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis† |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis† |
title_short | Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis† |
title_sort | safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis† |
topic | General Adult Cardiac |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5848807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28475690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klautzrobertjm safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT kappeteinapieter safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT langerudiger safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT dagenaisfrancois safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT labrousselouis safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT bapatvinayak safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT morontmichael safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT misfeldmartin safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT zengcathy safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT sabikiiijosephf safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis AT safetyeffectivenessandhaemodynamicperformanceofanewstentedaorticvalvebioprosthesis |