Cargando…
At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference
Developmental differences regarding decision making are often reported in the absence of emotional stimuli and without context, failing to explain why some individuals are more likely to have a greater inclination toward risk. The current study (N = 212; 10–25y) examined the influence of emotional c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.010 |
_version_ | 1783306020681940992 |
---|---|
author | Rudolph, Marc D. Miranda-Domínguez, Oscar Cohen, Alexandra O. Breiner, Kaitlyn Steinberg, Laurence Bonnie, Richard J. Scott, Elizabeth S. Taylor-Thompson, Kim Chein, Jason Fettich, Karla C. Richeson, Jennifer A. Dellarco, Danielle V. Galván, Adriana Casey, B.J. Fair, Damien A. |
author_facet | Rudolph, Marc D. Miranda-Domínguez, Oscar Cohen, Alexandra O. Breiner, Kaitlyn Steinberg, Laurence Bonnie, Richard J. Scott, Elizabeth S. Taylor-Thompson, Kim Chein, Jason Fettich, Karla C. Richeson, Jennifer A. Dellarco, Danielle V. Galván, Adriana Casey, B.J. Fair, Damien A. |
author_sort | Rudolph, Marc D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Developmental differences regarding decision making are often reported in the absence of emotional stimuli and without context, failing to explain why some individuals are more likely to have a greater inclination toward risk. The current study (N = 212; 10–25y) examined the influence of emotional context on underlying functional brain connectivity over development and its impact on risk preference. Using functional imaging data in a neutral brain-state we first identify the “brain age” of a given individual then validate it with an independent measure of cortical thickness. We then show, on average, that “brain age” across the group during the teen years has the propensity to look younger in emotional contexts. Further, we show this phenotype (i.e. a younger brain age in emotional contexts) relates to a group mean difference in risk perception − a pattern exemplified greatest in young-adults (ages 18–21). The results are suggestive of a specified functional brain phenotype that relates to being at “risk to be risky.” |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5849238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58492382018-04-01 At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference Rudolph, Marc D. Miranda-Domínguez, Oscar Cohen, Alexandra O. Breiner, Kaitlyn Steinberg, Laurence Bonnie, Richard J. Scott, Elizabeth S. Taylor-Thompson, Kim Chein, Jason Fettich, Karla C. Richeson, Jennifer A. Dellarco, Danielle V. Galván, Adriana Casey, B.J. Fair, Damien A. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Developmental differences regarding decision making are often reported in the absence of emotional stimuli and without context, failing to explain why some individuals are more likely to have a greater inclination toward risk. The current study (N = 212; 10–25y) examined the influence of emotional context on underlying functional brain connectivity over development and its impact on risk preference. Using functional imaging data in a neutral brain-state we first identify the “brain age” of a given individual then validate it with an independent measure of cortical thickness. We then show, on average, that “brain age” across the group during the teen years has the propensity to look younger in emotional contexts. Further, we show this phenotype (i.e. a younger brain age in emotional contexts) relates to a group mean difference in risk perception − a pattern exemplified greatest in young-adults (ages 18–21). The results are suggestive of a specified functional brain phenotype that relates to being at “risk to be risky.” Elsevier 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5849238/ /pubmed/28279917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.010 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rudolph, Marc D. Miranda-Domínguez, Oscar Cohen, Alexandra O. Breiner, Kaitlyn Steinberg, Laurence Bonnie, Richard J. Scott, Elizabeth S. Taylor-Thompson, Kim Chein, Jason Fettich, Karla C. Richeson, Jennifer A. Dellarco, Danielle V. Galván, Adriana Casey, B.J. Fair, Damien A. At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference |
title | At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference |
title_full | At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference |
title_fullStr | At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference |
title_full_unstemmed | At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference |
title_short | At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference |
title_sort | at risk of being risky: the relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudolphmarcd atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT mirandadominguezoscar atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT cohenalexandrao atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT breinerkaitlyn atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT steinberglaurence atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT bonnierichardj atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT scottelizabeths atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT taylorthompsonkim atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT cheinjason atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT fettichkarlac atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT richesonjennifera atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT dellarcodaniellev atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT galvanadriana atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT caseybj atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference AT fairdamiena atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference |