Cargando…

At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference

Developmental differences regarding decision making are often reported in the absence of emotional stimuli and without context, failing to explain why some individuals are more likely to have a greater inclination toward risk. The current study (N = 212; 10–25y) examined the influence of emotional c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudolph, Marc D., Miranda-Domínguez, Oscar, Cohen, Alexandra O., Breiner, Kaitlyn, Steinberg, Laurence, Bonnie, Richard J., Scott, Elizabeth S., Taylor-Thompson, Kim, Chein, Jason, Fettich, Karla C., Richeson, Jennifer A., Dellarco, Danielle V., Galván, Adriana, Casey, B.J., Fair, Damien A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.010
_version_ 1783306020681940992
author Rudolph, Marc D.
Miranda-Domínguez, Oscar
Cohen, Alexandra O.
Breiner, Kaitlyn
Steinberg, Laurence
Bonnie, Richard J.
Scott, Elizabeth S.
Taylor-Thompson, Kim
Chein, Jason
Fettich, Karla C.
Richeson, Jennifer A.
Dellarco, Danielle V.
Galván, Adriana
Casey, B.J.
Fair, Damien A.
author_facet Rudolph, Marc D.
Miranda-Domínguez, Oscar
Cohen, Alexandra O.
Breiner, Kaitlyn
Steinberg, Laurence
Bonnie, Richard J.
Scott, Elizabeth S.
Taylor-Thompson, Kim
Chein, Jason
Fettich, Karla C.
Richeson, Jennifer A.
Dellarco, Danielle V.
Galván, Adriana
Casey, B.J.
Fair, Damien A.
author_sort Rudolph, Marc D.
collection PubMed
description Developmental differences regarding decision making are often reported in the absence of emotional stimuli and without context, failing to explain why some individuals are more likely to have a greater inclination toward risk. The current study (N = 212; 10–25y) examined the influence of emotional context on underlying functional brain connectivity over development and its impact on risk preference. Using functional imaging data in a neutral brain-state we first identify the “brain age” of a given individual then validate it with an independent measure of cortical thickness. We then show, on average, that “brain age” across the group during the teen years has the propensity to look younger in emotional contexts. Further, we show this phenotype (i.e. a younger brain age in emotional contexts) relates to a group mean difference in risk perception − a pattern exemplified greatest in young-adults (ages 18–21). The results are suggestive of a specified functional brain phenotype that relates to being at “risk to be risky.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5849238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58492382018-04-01 At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference Rudolph, Marc D. Miranda-Domínguez, Oscar Cohen, Alexandra O. Breiner, Kaitlyn Steinberg, Laurence Bonnie, Richard J. Scott, Elizabeth S. Taylor-Thompson, Kim Chein, Jason Fettich, Karla C. Richeson, Jennifer A. Dellarco, Danielle V. Galván, Adriana Casey, B.J. Fair, Damien A. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Developmental differences regarding decision making are often reported in the absence of emotional stimuli and without context, failing to explain why some individuals are more likely to have a greater inclination toward risk. The current study (N = 212; 10–25y) examined the influence of emotional context on underlying functional brain connectivity over development and its impact on risk preference. Using functional imaging data in a neutral brain-state we first identify the “brain age” of a given individual then validate it with an independent measure of cortical thickness. We then show, on average, that “brain age” across the group during the teen years has the propensity to look younger in emotional contexts. Further, we show this phenotype (i.e. a younger brain age in emotional contexts) relates to a group mean difference in risk perception − a pattern exemplified greatest in young-adults (ages 18–21). The results are suggestive of a specified functional brain phenotype that relates to being at “risk to be risky.” Elsevier 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5849238/ /pubmed/28279917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.010 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Rudolph, Marc D.
Miranda-Domínguez, Oscar
Cohen, Alexandra O.
Breiner, Kaitlyn
Steinberg, Laurence
Bonnie, Richard J.
Scott, Elizabeth S.
Taylor-Thompson, Kim
Chein, Jason
Fettich, Karla C.
Richeson, Jennifer A.
Dellarco, Danielle V.
Galván, Adriana
Casey, B.J.
Fair, Damien A.
At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference
title At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference
title_full At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference
title_fullStr At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference
title_full_unstemmed At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference
title_short At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference
title_sort at risk of being risky: the relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.010
work_keys_str_mv AT rudolphmarcd atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT mirandadominguezoscar atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT cohenalexandrao atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT breinerkaitlyn atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT steinberglaurence atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT bonnierichardj atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT scottelizabeths atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT taylorthompsonkim atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT cheinjason atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT fettichkarlac atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT richesonjennifera atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT dellarcodaniellev atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT galvanadriana atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT caseybj atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference
AT fairdamiena atriskofbeingriskytherelationshipbetweenbrainageunderemotionalstatesandriskpreference