Cargando…
The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis
OBJECTIVE: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis is an advantageous approach because it is associated with a shorter hospital stay; however, few studies have reported the incidence of complications related to this procedure in detail. The aim of this study was to examine the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151506 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9123-17 |
_version_ | 1783306052460085248 |
---|---|
author | Saito, Hirokazu Kadono, Yoshihiro Kamikawa, Kentaro Urata, Atsushi Imamura, Haruo Matsushita, Ikuo Kakuma, Tatsuyuki Tada, Shuji |
author_facet | Saito, Hirokazu Kadono, Yoshihiro Kamikawa, Kentaro Urata, Atsushi Imamura, Haruo Matsushita, Ikuo Kakuma, Tatsuyuki Tada, Shuji |
author_sort | Saito, Hirokazu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis is an advantageous approach because it is associated with a shorter hospital stay; however, few studies have reported the incidence of complications related to this procedure in detail. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of complications and efficacy of this procedure. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated the incidence of complications in 345 patients with naive papilla who underwent therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis at three institutions between April 2014 and March 2016 by a propensity score analysis. The efficacy of single-stage endoscopic stone removal was assessed based on a hospital stay of within 7 days and the number of ERCP attempts. RESULTS: Among 114 patients who underwent single-stage endoscopic stone removal, 15 patients (13.2%) experienced complications. Among the remaining 231 patients in the two-stage endoscopic stone removal group, complications were observed in 17 patients (7.4%). The propensity score analysis, which was adjusted for confounding factors, revealed that single-stage endoscopic stone removal was not a significant risk factor for complications (p=0.52). In patients in whom >10 min was required for deep cannulation, single-stage endoscopic stone removal was not a significant risk factor for complications in the propensity score analysis (p=0.37). In the single-stage group, the proportion of patients with a hospital stay of within 7 days was significantly higher and the number of ERCP attempts was significantly lower in comparison to the two-stage group (p <0.0001 and <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal did not increase the incidence of complications associated with ERCP and was effective for reducing the hospital stay and the number of ERCP attempts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5849540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58495402018-03-15 The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis Saito, Hirokazu Kadono, Yoshihiro Kamikawa, Kentaro Urata, Atsushi Imamura, Haruo Matsushita, Ikuo Kakuma, Tatsuyuki Tada, Shuji Intern Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis is an advantageous approach because it is associated with a shorter hospital stay; however, few studies have reported the incidence of complications related to this procedure in detail. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of complications and efficacy of this procedure. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated the incidence of complications in 345 patients with naive papilla who underwent therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis at three institutions between April 2014 and March 2016 by a propensity score analysis. The efficacy of single-stage endoscopic stone removal was assessed based on a hospital stay of within 7 days and the number of ERCP attempts. RESULTS: Among 114 patients who underwent single-stage endoscopic stone removal, 15 patients (13.2%) experienced complications. Among the remaining 231 patients in the two-stage endoscopic stone removal group, complications were observed in 17 patients (7.4%). The propensity score analysis, which was adjusted for confounding factors, revealed that single-stage endoscopic stone removal was not a significant risk factor for complications (p=0.52). In patients in whom >10 min was required for deep cannulation, single-stage endoscopic stone removal was not a significant risk factor for complications in the propensity score analysis (p=0.37). In the single-stage group, the proportion of patients with a hospital stay of within 7 days was significantly higher and the number of ERCP attempts was significantly lower in comparison to the two-stage group (p <0.0001 and <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal did not increase the incidence of complications associated with ERCP and was effective for reducing the hospital stay and the number of ERCP attempts. The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2017-11-20 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5849540/ /pubmed/29151506 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9123-17 Text en Copyright © 2018 by The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The Internal Medicine is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Saito, Hirokazu Kadono, Yoshihiro Kamikawa, Kentaro Urata, Atsushi Imamura, Haruo Matsushita, Ikuo Kakuma, Tatsuyuki Tada, Shuji The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title | The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_full | The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_short | The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis |
title_sort | incidence of complications in single-stage endoscopic stone removal for patients with common bile duct stones: a propensity score analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151506 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9123-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saitohirokazu theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT kadonoyoshihiro theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT kamikawakentaro theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT urataatsushi theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT imamuraharuo theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT matsushitaikuo theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT kakumatatsuyuki theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT tadashuji theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT saitohirokazu incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT kadonoyoshihiro incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT kamikawakentaro incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT urataatsushi incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT imamuraharuo incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT matsushitaikuo incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT kakumatatsuyuki incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis AT tadashuji incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis |