Cargando…

The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis

OBJECTIVE: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis is an advantageous approach because it is associated with a shorter hospital stay; however, few studies have reported the incidence of complications related to this procedure in detail. The aim of this study was to examine the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Hirokazu, Kadono, Yoshihiro, Kamikawa, Kentaro, Urata, Atsushi, Imamura, Haruo, Matsushita, Ikuo, Kakuma, Tatsuyuki, Tada, Shuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151506
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9123-17
_version_ 1783306052460085248
author Saito, Hirokazu
Kadono, Yoshihiro
Kamikawa, Kentaro
Urata, Atsushi
Imamura, Haruo
Matsushita, Ikuo
Kakuma, Tatsuyuki
Tada, Shuji
author_facet Saito, Hirokazu
Kadono, Yoshihiro
Kamikawa, Kentaro
Urata, Atsushi
Imamura, Haruo
Matsushita, Ikuo
Kakuma, Tatsuyuki
Tada, Shuji
author_sort Saito, Hirokazu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis is an advantageous approach because it is associated with a shorter hospital stay; however, few studies have reported the incidence of complications related to this procedure in detail. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of complications and efficacy of this procedure. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated the incidence of complications in 345 patients with naive papilla who underwent therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis at three institutions between April 2014 and March 2016 by a propensity score analysis. The efficacy of single-stage endoscopic stone removal was assessed based on a hospital stay of within 7 days and the number of ERCP attempts. RESULTS: Among 114 patients who underwent single-stage endoscopic stone removal, 15 patients (13.2%) experienced complications. Among the remaining 231 patients in the two-stage endoscopic stone removal group, complications were observed in 17 patients (7.4%). The propensity score analysis, which was adjusted for confounding factors, revealed that single-stage endoscopic stone removal was not a significant risk factor for complications (p=0.52). In patients in whom >10 min was required for deep cannulation, single-stage endoscopic stone removal was not a significant risk factor for complications in the propensity score analysis (p=0.37). In the single-stage group, the proportion of patients with a hospital stay of within 7 days was significantly higher and the number of ERCP attempts was significantly lower in comparison to the two-stage group (p <0.0001 and <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal did not increase the incidence of complications associated with ERCP and was effective for reducing the hospital stay and the number of ERCP attempts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5849540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58495402018-03-15 The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis Saito, Hirokazu Kadono, Yoshihiro Kamikawa, Kentaro Urata, Atsushi Imamura, Haruo Matsushita, Ikuo Kakuma, Tatsuyuki Tada, Shuji Intern Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis is an advantageous approach because it is associated with a shorter hospital stay; however, few studies have reported the incidence of complications related to this procedure in detail. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of complications and efficacy of this procedure. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated the incidence of complications in 345 patients with naive papilla who underwent therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis at three institutions between April 2014 and March 2016 by a propensity score analysis. The efficacy of single-stage endoscopic stone removal was assessed based on a hospital stay of within 7 days and the number of ERCP attempts. RESULTS: Among 114 patients who underwent single-stage endoscopic stone removal, 15 patients (13.2%) experienced complications. Among the remaining 231 patients in the two-stage endoscopic stone removal group, complications were observed in 17 patients (7.4%). The propensity score analysis, which was adjusted for confounding factors, revealed that single-stage endoscopic stone removal was not a significant risk factor for complications (p=0.52). In patients in whom >10 min was required for deep cannulation, single-stage endoscopic stone removal was not a significant risk factor for complications in the propensity score analysis (p=0.37). In the single-stage group, the proportion of patients with a hospital stay of within 7 days was significantly higher and the number of ERCP attempts was significantly lower in comparison to the two-stage group (p <0.0001 and <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Single-stage endoscopic stone removal did not increase the incidence of complications associated with ERCP and was effective for reducing the hospital stay and the number of ERCP attempts. The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2017-11-20 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5849540/ /pubmed/29151506 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9123-17 Text en Copyright © 2018 by The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The Internal Medicine is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Saito, Hirokazu
Kadono, Yoshihiro
Kamikawa, Kentaro
Urata, Atsushi
Imamura, Haruo
Matsushita, Ikuo
Kakuma, Tatsuyuki
Tada, Shuji
The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis
title The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis
title_full The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis
title_fullStr The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis
title_short The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis
title_sort incidence of complications in single-stage endoscopic stone removal for patients with common bile duct stones: a propensity score analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151506
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9123-17
work_keys_str_mv AT saitohirokazu theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT kadonoyoshihiro theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT kamikawakentaro theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT urataatsushi theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT imamuraharuo theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT matsushitaikuo theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT kakumatatsuyuki theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT tadashuji theincidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT saitohirokazu incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT kadonoyoshihiro incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT kamikawakentaro incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT urataatsushi incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT imamuraharuo incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT matsushitaikuo incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT kakumatatsuyuki incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis
AT tadashuji incidenceofcomplicationsinsinglestageendoscopicstoneremovalforpatientswithcommonbileductstonesapropensityscoreanalysis