Cargando…

5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection

This position paper intends to stimulate a profound rethinking of contemporary agricultural practice. We criticise the current intensity of chemical plant protection in Germany as ecologically unsustainable and thus threatening the achievement of key targets of environmental protection and nature co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frische, Tobias, Egerer, Sina, Matezki, Steffen, Pickl, Christina, Wogram, Jörn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0136-2
_version_ 1783306070687481856
author Frische, Tobias
Egerer, Sina
Matezki, Steffen
Pickl, Christina
Wogram, Jörn
author_facet Frische, Tobias
Egerer, Sina
Matezki, Steffen
Pickl, Christina
Wogram, Jörn
author_sort Frische, Tobias
collection PubMed
description This position paper intends to stimulate a profound rethinking of contemporary agricultural practice. We criticise the current intensity of chemical plant protection in Germany as ecologically unsustainable and thus threatening the achievement of key targets of environmental protection and nature conservation policies. In the first part of the paper, we provide background information on the use of plant protection products (PPP) in German agriculture, the role of agricultural policy, European pesticide legislation, the principles of and framework for environmental risk assessment and risk management of PPP, as well as environmental effects of PPP. The second part is presented against the backdrop of the European “Sustainable Use Directive” (2009/128/EC). This directive requires that “Member States shall adopt National Action Plans to set up their quantitative objectives, targets, measures, and timetables to reduce risks and impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment and to encourage the development and introduction of integrated pest management and of alternative approaches or techniques to reduce dependency on the use of pesticides.” Reflecting on the corresponding debate in Germany, we suggest the following five key principles for a sustainable use of PPP and provide recommendations for their implementation: (1) minimising use; (2) identifying, quantifying, and communicating risks; (3) optimising risk management; (4) compensating for unavoidable effects; (5) internalising external costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5849641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58496412018-03-21 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection Frische, Tobias Egerer, Sina Matezki, Steffen Pickl, Christina Wogram, Jörn Environ Sci Eur Discussion This position paper intends to stimulate a profound rethinking of contemporary agricultural practice. We criticise the current intensity of chemical plant protection in Germany as ecologically unsustainable and thus threatening the achievement of key targets of environmental protection and nature conservation policies. In the first part of the paper, we provide background information on the use of plant protection products (PPP) in German agriculture, the role of agricultural policy, European pesticide legislation, the principles of and framework for environmental risk assessment and risk management of PPP, as well as environmental effects of PPP. The second part is presented against the backdrop of the European “Sustainable Use Directive” (2009/128/EC). This directive requires that “Member States shall adopt National Action Plans to set up their quantitative objectives, targets, measures, and timetables to reduce risks and impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment and to encourage the development and introduction of integrated pest management and of alternative approaches or techniques to reduce dependency on the use of pesticides.” Reflecting on the corresponding debate in Germany, we suggest the following five key principles for a sustainable use of PPP and provide recommendations for their implementation: (1) minimising use; (2) identifying, quantifying, and communicating risks; (3) optimising risk management; (4) compensating for unavoidable effects; (5) internalising external costs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5849641/ /pubmed/29576997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0136-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Discussion
Frische, Tobias
Egerer, Sina
Matezki, Steffen
Pickl, Christina
Wogram, Jörn
5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection
title 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection
title_full 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection
title_fullStr 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection
title_full_unstemmed 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection
title_short 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection
title_sort 5-point programme for sustainable plant protection
topic Discussion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0136-2
work_keys_str_mv AT frischetobias 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection
AT egerersina 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection
AT matezkisteffen 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection
AT picklchristina 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection
AT wogramjorn 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection