Cargando…
5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection
This position paper intends to stimulate a profound rethinking of contemporary agricultural practice. We criticise the current intensity of chemical plant protection in Germany as ecologically unsustainable and thus threatening the achievement of key targets of environmental protection and nature co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0136-2 |
_version_ | 1783306070687481856 |
---|---|
author | Frische, Tobias Egerer, Sina Matezki, Steffen Pickl, Christina Wogram, Jörn |
author_facet | Frische, Tobias Egerer, Sina Matezki, Steffen Pickl, Christina Wogram, Jörn |
author_sort | Frische, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | This position paper intends to stimulate a profound rethinking of contemporary agricultural practice. We criticise the current intensity of chemical plant protection in Germany as ecologically unsustainable and thus threatening the achievement of key targets of environmental protection and nature conservation policies. In the first part of the paper, we provide background information on the use of plant protection products (PPP) in German agriculture, the role of agricultural policy, European pesticide legislation, the principles of and framework for environmental risk assessment and risk management of PPP, as well as environmental effects of PPP. The second part is presented against the backdrop of the European “Sustainable Use Directive” (2009/128/EC). This directive requires that “Member States shall adopt National Action Plans to set up their quantitative objectives, targets, measures, and timetables to reduce risks and impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment and to encourage the development and introduction of integrated pest management and of alternative approaches or techniques to reduce dependency on the use of pesticides.” Reflecting on the corresponding debate in Germany, we suggest the following five key principles for a sustainable use of PPP and provide recommendations for their implementation: (1) minimising use; (2) identifying, quantifying, and communicating risks; (3) optimising risk management; (4) compensating for unavoidable effects; (5) internalising external costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5849641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58496412018-03-21 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection Frische, Tobias Egerer, Sina Matezki, Steffen Pickl, Christina Wogram, Jörn Environ Sci Eur Discussion This position paper intends to stimulate a profound rethinking of contemporary agricultural practice. We criticise the current intensity of chemical plant protection in Germany as ecologically unsustainable and thus threatening the achievement of key targets of environmental protection and nature conservation policies. In the first part of the paper, we provide background information on the use of plant protection products (PPP) in German agriculture, the role of agricultural policy, European pesticide legislation, the principles of and framework for environmental risk assessment and risk management of PPP, as well as environmental effects of PPP. The second part is presented against the backdrop of the European “Sustainable Use Directive” (2009/128/EC). This directive requires that “Member States shall adopt National Action Plans to set up their quantitative objectives, targets, measures, and timetables to reduce risks and impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment and to encourage the development and introduction of integrated pest management and of alternative approaches or techniques to reduce dependency on the use of pesticides.” Reflecting on the corresponding debate in Germany, we suggest the following five key principles for a sustainable use of PPP and provide recommendations for their implementation: (1) minimising use; (2) identifying, quantifying, and communicating risks; (3) optimising risk management; (4) compensating for unavoidable effects; (5) internalising external costs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5849641/ /pubmed/29576997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0136-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Discussion Frische, Tobias Egerer, Sina Matezki, Steffen Pickl, Christina Wogram, Jörn 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection |
title | 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection |
title_full | 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection |
title_fullStr | 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection |
title_full_unstemmed | 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection |
title_short | 5-Point programme for sustainable plant protection |
title_sort | 5-point programme for sustainable plant protection |
topic | Discussion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0136-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frischetobias 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection AT egerersina 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection AT matezkisteffen 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection AT picklchristina 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection AT wogramjorn 5pointprogrammeforsustainableplantprotection |