Cargando…
Does intensity modulation increase target dose calculation errors of conventional algorithms for lung SBRT?
PURPOSE: Conventional dose algorithms (Type A and Type B) for lung SBRT can display considerable target dose errors compared to Type‐C algorithms. Intensity‐modulated techniques (IMRT/VMAT) are increasingly being utilized for lung SBRT. Therefore, our study aimed to assess whether intensity modulati...
Autores principales: | Zheng, Dandan, Verma, Vivek, Wang, Shuo, Liang, Xiaoying, Zhou, Sumin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29388325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12266 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Dose differences in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT
por: Liu, Han, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo‐based dose distributions
por: Ojala, Jarkko J., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
por: Zheng, Dandan, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams
por: Hu, Ye Angela, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Cleaning the dose falloff in lung SBRT plan
por: Desai, Dharmin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)