Cargando…

Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study summarizes the cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) procedure at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated for 40 patients with 188 lesions (range 2–8, median 5) in Eclip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballangrud, Åse, Kuo, Li Cheng, Happersett, Laura, Lim, Seng Boh, Beal, Kathryn, Yamada, Yoshiya, Hunt, Margie, Mechalakos, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29476588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12284
_version_ 1783306113443168256
author Ballangrud, Åse
Kuo, Li Cheng
Happersett, Laura
Lim, Seng Boh
Beal, Kathryn
Yamada, Yoshiya
Hunt, Margie
Mechalakos, James
author_facet Ballangrud, Åse
Kuo, Li Cheng
Happersett, Laura
Lim, Seng Boh
Beal, Kathryn
Yamada, Yoshiya
Hunt, Margie
Mechalakos, James
author_sort Ballangrud, Åse
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study summarizes the cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) procedure at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated for 40 patients with 188 lesions (range 2–8, median 5) in Eclipse and treated on a TrueBeam STx. Limitations of the custom beam model outside the central 2.5 mm leaves necessitated more than one isocenter pending the spatial distribution of lesions. Two to nine arcs were used per isocenter. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI) and target dose heterogeneity index (HI) were determined for each lesion. Dose to critical structures and treatment times are reported. RESULTS: Lesion size ranged 0.05–17.74 cm(3) (median 0.77 cm(3)), and total tumor volume per case ranged 1.09–26.95 cm(3) (median 7.11 cm(3)). For each lesion, HI ranged 1.2–1.5 (median 1.3), CI ranged 1.0–2.9 (median 1.2), and GI ranged 2.5–8.4 (median 4.4). By correlating GI to PTV volume a predicted GI = 4/PTV(0.2) was determined and implemented in a script in Eclipse and used for plan evaluation. Brain volume receiving 7 Gy (V (7 Gy)) ranged 10–136 cm(3) (median 42 cm(3)). Total treatment time ranged 24–138 min (median 61 min). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric modulated arc therapy provide plans with steep dose gradients around the targets and low dose to critical structures, and VMAT treatment is delivered in a shorter time than conventional methods using one isocenter per lesion. To further improve VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases, better tools to shorten planning time are needed. The most significant improvement would come from better dose modeling in Eclipse, possibly by allowing for customizing the dynamic leaf gap (DLG) for a special SRS model and not limit to one DLG per energy per treatment machine and thereby remove the limitation on the Y‐jaw and allow planning with a single isocenter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5849827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58498272018-04-02 Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases Ballangrud, Åse Kuo, Li Cheng Happersett, Laura Lim, Seng Boh Beal, Kathryn Yamada, Yoshiya Hunt, Margie Mechalakos, James J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study summarizes the cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) procedure at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated for 40 patients with 188 lesions (range 2–8, median 5) in Eclipse and treated on a TrueBeam STx. Limitations of the custom beam model outside the central 2.5 mm leaves necessitated more than one isocenter pending the spatial distribution of lesions. Two to nine arcs were used per isocenter. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI) and target dose heterogeneity index (HI) were determined for each lesion. Dose to critical structures and treatment times are reported. RESULTS: Lesion size ranged 0.05–17.74 cm(3) (median 0.77 cm(3)), and total tumor volume per case ranged 1.09–26.95 cm(3) (median 7.11 cm(3)). For each lesion, HI ranged 1.2–1.5 (median 1.3), CI ranged 1.0–2.9 (median 1.2), and GI ranged 2.5–8.4 (median 4.4). By correlating GI to PTV volume a predicted GI = 4/PTV(0.2) was determined and implemented in a script in Eclipse and used for plan evaluation. Brain volume receiving 7 Gy (V (7 Gy)) ranged 10–136 cm(3) (median 42 cm(3)). Total treatment time ranged 24–138 min (median 61 min). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric modulated arc therapy provide plans with steep dose gradients around the targets and low dose to critical structures, and VMAT treatment is delivered in a shorter time than conventional methods using one isocenter per lesion. To further improve VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases, better tools to shorten planning time are needed. The most significant improvement would come from better dose modeling in Eclipse, possibly by allowing for customizing the dynamic leaf gap (DLG) for a special SRS model and not limit to one DLG per energy per treatment machine and thereby remove the limitation on the Y‐jaw and allow planning with a single isocenter. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5849827/ /pubmed/29476588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12284 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Ballangrud, Åse
Kuo, Li Cheng
Happersett, Laura
Lim, Seng Boh
Beal, Kathryn
Yamada, Yoshiya
Hunt, Margie
Mechalakos, James
Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases
title Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases
title_full Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases
title_fullStr Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases
title_full_unstemmed Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases
title_short Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases
title_sort institutional experience with srs vmat planning for multiple cranial metastases
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29476588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12284
work_keys_str_mv AT ballangrudase institutionalexperiencewithsrsvmatplanningformultiplecranialmetastases
AT kuolicheng institutionalexperiencewithsrsvmatplanningformultiplecranialmetastases
AT happersettlaura institutionalexperiencewithsrsvmatplanningformultiplecranialmetastases
AT limsengboh institutionalexperiencewithsrsvmatplanningformultiplecranialmetastases
AT bealkathryn institutionalexperiencewithsrsvmatplanningformultiplecranialmetastases
AT yamadayoshiya institutionalexperiencewithsrsvmatplanningformultiplecranialmetastases
AT huntmargie institutionalexperiencewithsrsvmatplanningformultiplecranialmetastases
AT mechalakosjames institutionalexperiencewithsrsvmatplanningformultiplecranialmetastases