Cargando…

New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR‐V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR

PURPOSE: To assess the noise characteristics of the new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR‐V) in comparison to ASiR. METHODS: A water phantom was acquired with common clinical scanning parameters, at five different levels of CTDI(vol). Images were reconstructed with different kernel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Marco, Paolo, Origgi, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29363260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12253
_version_ 1783306115079995392
author De Marco, Paolo
Origgi, Daniela
author_facet De Marco, Paolo
Origgi, Daniela
author_sort De Marco, Paolo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the noise characteristics of the new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR‐V) in comparison to ASiR. METHODS: A water phantom was acquired with common clinical scanning parameters, at five different levels of CTDI(vol). Images were reconstructed with different kernels (STD, SOFT, and BONE), different IR levels (40%, 60%, and 100%) and different slice thickness (ST) (0.625 and 2.5 mm), both for ASiR‐V and ASiR. Noise properties were investigated and noise power spectrum (NPS) was evaluated. RESULTS: ASiR‐V significantly reduced noise relative to FBP: noise reduction was in the range 23%–60% for a 0.625 mm ST and 12%–64% for the 2.5 mm ST. Above 2 mGy, noise reduction for ASiR‐V had no dependence on dose. Noise reduction for ASIR‐V has dependence on ST, being greater for STD and SOFT kernels at 2.5 mm. For the STD kernel ASiR‐V has greater noise reduction for both ST, if compared to ASiR. For the SOFT kernel, results varies according to dose and ST, while for BONE kernel ASIR‐V shows less noise reduction. NPS for CT Revolution has dose dependent behavior at lower doses. NPS for ASIR‐V and ASiR is similar, showing a shift toward lower frequencies as the IR level increases for STD and SOFT kernels. The NPS is different between ASiR‐V and ASIR with BONE kernel. NPS for ASiR‐V appears to be ST dependent, having a shift toward lower frequencies for 2.5 mm ST. CONCLUSIONS: ASiR‐V showed greater noise reduction than ASiR for STD and SOFT kernels, while keeping the same NPS. For the BONE kernel, ASiR‐V presents a completely different behavior, with less noise reduction and modified NPS. Noise properties of the ASiR‐V are dependent on reconstruction slice thickness. The noise properties of ASiR‐V suggest the need for further measurements and efforts to establish new CT protocols to optimize clinical imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5849834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58498342018-04-02 New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR‐V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR De Marco, Paolo Origgi, Daniela J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PURPOSE: To assess the noise characteristics of the new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR‐V) in comparison to ASiR. METHODS: A water phantom was acquired with common clinical scanning parameters, at five different levels of CTDI(vol). Images were reconstructed with different kernels (STD, SOFT, and BONE), different IR levels (40%, 60%, and 100%) and different slice thickness (ST) (0.625 and 2.5 mm), both for ASiR‐V and ASiR. Noise properties were investigated and noise power spectrum (NPS) was evaluated. RESULTS: ASiR‐V significantly reduced noise relative to FBP: noise reduction was in the range 23%–60% for a 0.625 mm ST and 12%–64% for the 2.5 mm ST. Above 2 mGy, noise reduction for ASiR‐V had no dependence on dose. Noise reduction for ASIR‐V has dependence on ST, being greater for STD and SOFT kernels at 2.5 mm. For the STD kernel ASiR‐V has greater noise reduction for both ST, if compared to ASiR. For the SOFT kernel, results varies according to dose and ST, while for BONE kernel ASIR‐V shows less noise reduction. NPS for CT Revolution has dose dependent behavior at lower doses. NPS for ASIR‐V and ASiR is similar, showing a shift toward lower frequencies as the IR level increases for STD and SOFT kernels. The NPS is different between ASiR‐V and ASIR with BONE kernel. NPS for ASiR‐V appears to be ST dependent, having a shift toward lower frequencies for 2.5 mm ST. CONCLUSIONS: ASiR‐V showed greater noise reduction than ASiR for STD and SOFT kernels, while keeping the same NPS. For the BONE kernel, ASiR‐V presents a completely different behavior, with less noise reduction and modified NPS. Noise properties of the ASiR‐V are dependent on reconstruction slice thickness. The noise properties of ASiR‐V suggest the need for further measurements and efforts to establish new CT protocols to optimize clinical imaging. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5849834/ /pubmed/29363260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12253 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
De Marco, Paolo
Origgi, Daniela
New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR‐V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR
title New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR‐V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR
title_full New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR‐V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR
title_fullStr New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR‐V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR
title_full_unstemmed New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR‐V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR
title_short New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR‐V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR
title_sort new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction asir‐v: assessment of noise performance in comparison to asir
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29363260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12253
work_keys_str_mv AT demarcopaolo newadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionasirvassessmentofnoiseperformanceincomparisontoasir
AT origgidaniela newadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionasirvassessmentofnoiseperformanceincomparisontoasir