Cargando…

A comparison of functional and tractography based networks in cerebral small vessel disease

OBJECTIVE: MRI measures of network integrity may be useful disease markers in cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). We compared the sensitivity and reproducibility of MRI derived structural and functional network measures in healthy controls and SVD subjects. METHODS: Diffusion tractography and resti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lawrence, Andrew J., Tozer, Daniel J., Stamatakis, Emmanuel A., Markus, Hugh S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.013
_version_ 1783306120685682688
author Lawrence, Andrew J.
Tozer, Daniel J.
Stamatakis, Emmanuel A.
Markus, Hugh S.
author_facet Lawrence, Andrew J.
Tozer, Daniel J.
Stamatakis, Emmanuel A.
Markus, Hugh S.
author_sort Lawrence, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: MRI measures of network integrity may be useful disease markers in cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). We compared the sensitivity and reproducibility of MRI derived structural and functional network measures in healthy controls and SVD subjects. METHODS: Diffusion tractography and resting state fMRI were used to create connectivity matrices from 26 subjects with symptomatic MRI confirmed lacunar stroke and 19 controls. Matrices were constructed at multiple scales based on a multi-resolution cortical atlas and at multiple thresholds for the matrix density. Network parameters were calculated over the multiple resolutions and thresholds. In addition the reproducibility of structural and functional network parameters was determined in a subset of the subjects (15 SVD, 10 controls) who were scanned twice. RESULTS: Structural networks showed a highly significant loss of network integrity in SVD cases compared to controls, for all network measures. In contrast functional networks showed no difference between SVD and controls. Structural network measures were highly reproducible in both cases and controls, with ICC values consistently over 0.8. In contrast functional network measures showed much poorer reproducibility with ICC values in the range 0.4–0.6 overall, and even lower in SVD cases. CONCLUSIONS: Structural networks identify impaired network integrity, and are highly reproducible, in SVD, supporting their use as markers of SVD disease severity. In contrast, functional networks showed low reproducibility, particularly in SVD cases, and were unable to detect differences between SVD cases and controls with this sample size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5849860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58498602018-03-14 A comparison of functional and tractography based networks in cerebral small vessel disease Lawrence, Andrew J. Tozer, Daniel J. Stamatakis, Emmanuel A. Markus, Hugh S. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article OBJECTIVE: MRI measures of network integrity may be useful disease markers in cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). We compared the sensitivity and reproducibility of MRI derived structural and functional network measures in healthy controls and SVD subjects. METHODS: Diffusion tractography and resting state fMRI were used to create connectivity matrices from 26 subjects with symptomatic MRI confirmed lacunar stroke and 19 controls. Matrices were constructed at multiple scales based on a multi-resolution cortical atlas and at multiple thresholds for the matrix density. Network parameters were calculated over the multiple resolutions and thresholds. In addition the reproducibility of structural and functional network parameters was determined in a subset of the subjects (15 SVD, 10 controls) who were scanned twice. RESULTS: Structural networks showed a highly significant loss of network integrity in SVD cases compared to controls, for all network measures. In contrast functional networks showed no difference between SVD and controls. Structural network measures were highly reproducible in both cases and controls, with ICC values consistently over 0.8. In contrast functional network measures showed much poorer reproducibility with ICC values in the range 0.4–0.6 overall, and even lower in SVD cases. CONCLUSIONS: Structural networks identify impaired network integrity, and are highly reproducible, in SVD, supporting their use as markers of SVD disease severity. In contrast, functional networks showed low reproducibility, particularly in SVD cases, and were unable to detect differences between SVD cases and controls with this sample size. Elsevier 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5849860/ /pubmed/29541576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.013 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Lawrence, Andrew J.
Tozer, Daniel J.
Stamatakis, Emmanuel A.
Markus, Hugh S.
A comparison of functional and tractography based networks in cerebral small vessel disease
title A comparison of functional and tractography based networks in cerebral small vessel disease
title_full A comparison of functional and tractography based networks in cerebral small vessel disease
title_fullStr A comparison of functional and tractography based networks in cerebral small vessel disease
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of functional and tractography based networks in cerebral small vessel disease
title_short A comparison of functional and tractography based networks in cerebral small vessel disease
title_sort comparison of functional and tractography based networks in cerebral small vessel disease
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.013
work_keys_str_mv AT lawrenceandrewj acomparisonoffunctionalandtractographybasednetworksincerebralsmallvesseldisease
AT tozerdanielj acomparisonoffunctionalandtractographybasednetworksincerebralsmallvesseldisease
AT stamatakisemmanuela acomparisonoffunctionalandtractographybasednetworksincerebralsmallvesseldisease
AT markushughs acomparisonoffunctionalandtractographybasednetworksincerebralsmallvesseldisease
AT lawrenceandrewj comparisonoffunctionalandtractographybasednetworksincerebralsmallvesseldisease
AT tozerdanielj comparisonoffunctionalandtractographybasednetworksincerebralsmallvesseldisease
AT stamatakisemmanuela comparisonoffunctionalandtractographybasednetworksincerebralsmallvesseldisease
AT markushughs comparisonoffunctionalandtractographybasednetworksincerebralsmallvesseldisease