Cargando…

Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

AIM: To investigate post endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) of the esophagus. METHODS: We analyzed 55 consecutive cases with esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms at a tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. Eso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Dae Won, Youn, Young Hoon, Jung, Da Hyun, Park, Jae Jun, Kim, Jie-Hyun, Park, Hyojin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5850133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i10.1144
_version_ 1783306173522378752
author Ma, Dae Won
Youn, Young Hoon
Jung, Da Hyun
Park, Jae Jun
Kim, Jie-Hyun
Park, Hyojin
author_facet Ma, Dae Won
Youn, Young Hoon
Jung, Da Hyun
Park, Jae Jun
Kim, Jie-Hyun
Park, Hyojin
author_sort Ma, Dae Won
collection PubMed
description AIM: To investigate post endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) of the esophagus. METHODS: We analyzed 55 consecutive cases with esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms at a tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. Esophageal PEECS was defined as “mild” meeting one of the following criteria without any obvious perforation: fever (≥ 37.8 °C), leukocytosis (> 10800 cells/μL), or regional chest pain more than 5/10 points as rated on a numeric pain intensity scale. The grade of PEECS was determined as “severe” when meet two or more of above criteria. RESULTS: We included 51 cases without obvious complications in the analysis. The incidence of mild and severe esophageal PEECS was 47.1% and 17.6%, respectively. Risk factor analysis revealed that resected area, procedure time, and muscle layer exposure were significantly associated with PEECS. In multivariate analysis, a resected area larger than 6.0 cm(2) (OR = 4.995, 95%CI: 1.110-22.489, P = 0.036) and muscle layer exposure (OR = 5.661, 95%CI: 1.422-22.534, P = 0.014) were independent predictors of esophageal PEECS. All patients with PEECS had favorable outcomes with conservative management approaches, such as intravenous hydration or antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should consider the possibility of esophageal PEECS when the resected area exceeds 6.0 cm(2) or when the muscle layer exposure is noted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5850133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58501332018-03-21 Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection Ma, Dae Won Youn, Young Hoon Jung, Da Hyun Park, Jae Jun Kim, Jie-Hyun Park, Hyojin World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study AIM: To investigate post endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) of the esophagus. METHODS: We analyzed 55 consecutive cases with esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms at a tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. Esophageal PEECS was defined as “mild” meeting one of the following criteria without any obvious perforation: fever (≥ 37.8 °C), leukocytosis (> 10800 cells/μL), or regional chest pain more than 5/10 points as rated on a numeric pain intensity scale. The grade of PEECS was determined as “severe” when meet two or more of above criteria. RESULTS: We included 51 cases without obvious complications in the analysis. The incidence of mild and severe esophageal PEECS was 47.1% and 17.6%, respectively. Risk factor analysis revealed that resected area, procedure time, and muscle layer exposure were significantly associated with PEECS. In multivariate analysis, a resected area larger than 6.0 cm(2) (OR = 4.995, 95%CI: 1.110-22.489, P = 0.036) and muscle layer exposure (OR = 5.661, 95%CI: 1.422-22.534, P = 0.014) were independent predictors of esophageal PEECS. All patients with PEECS had favorable outcomes with conservative management approaches, such as intravenous hydration or antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should consider the possibility of esophageal PEECS when the resected area exceeds 6.0 cm(2) or when the muscle layer exposure is noted. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-03-14 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5850133/ /pubmed/29563758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i10.1144 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Ma, Dae Won
Youn, Young Hoon
Jung, Da Hyun
Park, Jae Jun
Kim, Jie-Hyun
Park, Hyojin
Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_full Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_fullStr Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_short Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_sort risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5850133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i10.1144
work_keys_str_mv AT madaewon riskfactorsofelectrocoagulationsyndromeafteresophagealendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT younyounghoon riskfactorsofelectrocoagulationsyndromeafteresophagealendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT jungdahyun riskfactorsofelectrocoagulationsyndromeafteresophagealendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT parkjaejun riskfactorsofelectrocoagulationsyndromeafteresophagealendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kimjiehyun riskfactorsofelectrocoagulationsyndromeafteresophagealendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT parkhyojin riskfactorsofelectrocoagulationsyndromeafteresophagealendoscopicsubmucosaldissection