Cargando…

Evidence for Pressure‐Independent Sympathetic Modulation of Central Pulse Wave Velocity

BACKGROUND: Whether the sympathetic nervous system can directly alter central aortic stiffness remains controversial, mainly because of the difficulty in experimentally augmenting peripheral vasoconstrictor activity without changing blood pressure. METHODS AND RESULTS: To address this limitation, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nardone, Massimo, Incognito, Anthony V., Millar, Philip J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5850264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007971
_version_ 1783306203785330688
author Nardone, Massimo
Incognito, Anthony V.
Millar, Philip J.
author_facet Nardone, Massimo
Incognito, Anthony V.
Millar, Philip J.
author_sort Nardone, Massimo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether the sympathetic nervous system can directly alter central aortic stiffness remains controversial, mainly because of the difficulty in experimentally augmenting peripheral vasoconstrictor activity without changing blood pressure. METHODS AND RESULTS: To address this limitation, we utilized low‐level cardiopulmonary baroreflex loading and unloading shown previously to alter sympathetic outflow without evoking parallel hemodynamic modulation. Blood pressure and carotid‐femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (cf‐PWV) were measured in 32 healthy participants (24±2 years; women: n=15) before and during 12‐minute applications of low‐level lower body negative pressure; −7 mm Hg) and lower body positive pressure; +7 mm Hg), applied in a random order. Fibular nerve microneurography was used to collect muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in a subset (n=8) to confirm peripheral sympathetic responses. During lower body negative pressure, heart rate, blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, and total peripheral resistance were not statistically different (all P>0.05); MSNA burst frequency (+15%; P=0.007), total MSNA (+44%; P=0.006), and cf‐PWV (∆+0.3±0.2 m/s; P<0.001) increased. In total, 28 (88%) of participants observed an increase in cf‐PWV greater than the baseline typical error of measurement. During lower body positive pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and total peripheral resistance were not statistically different (all P>0.05), though blood pressure increased (P<0.05) and pulse pressure decreased (P=0.01); MSNA burst frequency (−4%; P=0.37), total MSNA (−7%; P=0.89), and cf‐PWV (∆0.0±0.2 m/s; P=0.68) were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that acute elevations in peripheral sympathetic activity can increase central aortic PWV in young participants independent of a change in distending or pulsatile blood pressure or heart rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5850264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58502642018-03-21 Evidence for Pressure‐Independent Sympathetic Modulation of Central Pulse Wave Velocity Nardone, Massimo Incognito, Anthony V. Millar, Philip J. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Whether the sympathetic nervous system can directly alter central aortic stiffness remains controversial, mainly because of the difficulty in experimentally augmenting peripheral vasoconstrictor activity without changing blood pressure. METHODS AND RESULTS: To address this limitation, we utilized low‐level cardiopulmonary baroreflex loading and unloading shown previously to alter sympathetic outflow without evoking parallel hemodynamic modulation. Blood pressure and carotid‐femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (cf‐PWV) were measured in 32 healthy participants (24±2 years; women: n=15) before and during 12‐minute applications of low‐level lower body negative pressure; −7 mm Hg) and lower body positive pressure; +7 mm Hg), applied in a random order. Fibular nerve microneurography was used to collect muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in a subset (n=8) to confirm peripheral sympathetic responses. During lower body negative pressure, heart rate, blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, and total peripheral resistance were not statistically different (all P>0.05); MSNA burst frequency (+15%; P=0.007), total MSNA (+44%; P=0.006), and cf‐PWV (∆+0.3±0.2 m/s; P<0.001) increased. In total, 28 (88%) of participants observed an increase in cf‐PWV greater than the baseline typical error of measurement. During lower body positive pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and total peripheral resistance were not statistically different (all P>0.05), though blood pressure increased (P<0.05) and pulse pressure decreased (P=0.01); MSNA burst frequency (−4%; P=0.37), total MSNA (−7%; P=0.89), and cf‐PWV (∆0.0±0.2 m/s; P=0.68) were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that acute elevations in peripheral sympathetic activity can increase central aortic PWV in young participants independent of a change in distending or pulsatile blood pressure or heart rate. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5850264/ /pubmed/29378730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007971 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nardone, Massimo
Incognito, Anthony V.
Millar, Philip J.
Evidence for Pressure‐Independent Sympathetic Modulation of Central Pulse Wave Velocity
title Evidence for Pressure‐Independent Sympathetic Modulation of Central Pulse Wave Velocity
title_full Evidence for Pressure‐Independent Sympathetic Modulation of Central Pulse Wave Velocity
title_fullStr Evidence for Pressure‐Independent Sympathetic Modulation of Central Pulse Wave Velocity
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for Pressure‐Independent Sympathetic Modulation of Central Pulse Wave Velocity
title_short Evidence for Pressure‐Independent Sympathetic Modulation of Central Pulse Wave Velocity
title_sort evidence for pressure‐independent sympathetic modulation of central pulse wave velocity
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5850264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007971
work_keys_str_mv AT nardonemassimo evidenceforpressureindependentsympatheticmodulationofcentralpulsewavevelocity
AT incognitoanthonyv evidenceforpressureindependentsympatheticmodulationofcentralpulsewavevelocity
AT millarphilipj evidenceforpressureindependentsympatheticmodulationofcentralpulsewavevelocity