Cargando…

Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Intrapartum antibiotic chemoprophylaxis (IAP) prevents most early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) disease. However, there is no description of how IAP is used around the world. This article is the sixth in a series estimating the burden of GBS disease. Here we aimed to review GBS scree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Doare, Kirsty, O’Driscoll, Megan, Turner, Kim, Seedat, Farah, Russell, Neal J, Seale, Anna C, Heath, Paul T, Lawn, Joy E, Baker, Carol J, Bartlett, Linda, Cutland, Clare, Gravett, Michael G, Ip, Margaret, Madhi, Shabir A, Rubens, Craig E, Saha, Samir K, Schrag, Stephanie, Sobanjo-ter Meulen, Ajoke, Vekemans, Johan, Kampmann, Beate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5850619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix654
_version_ 1783306255179186176
author Le Doare, Kirsty
O’Driscoll, Megan
Turner, Kim
Seedat, Farah
Russell, Neal J
Seale, Anna C
Heath, Paul T
Lawn, Joy E
Baker, Carol J
Bartlett, Linda
Cutland, Clare
Gravett, Michael G
Ip, Margaret
Madhi, Shabir A
Rubens, Craig E
Saha, Samir K
Schrag, Stephanie
Sobanjo-ter Meulen, Ajoke
Vekemans, Johan
Kampmann, Beate
author_facet Le Doare, Kirsty
O’Driscoll, Megan
Turner, Kim
Seedat, Farah
Russell, Neal J
Seale, Anna C
Heath, Paul T
Lawn, Joy E
Baker, Carol J
Bartlett, Linda
Cutland, Clare
Gravett, Michael G
Ip, Margaret
Madhi, Shabir A
Rubens, Craig E
Saha, Samir K
Schrag, Stephanie
Sobanjo-ter Meulen, Ajoke
Vekemans, Johan
Kampmann, Beate
author_sort Le Doare, Kirsty
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intrapartum antibiotic chemoprophylaxis (IAP) prevents most early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) disease. However, there is no description of how IAP is used around the world. This article is the sixth in a series estimating the burden of GBS disease. Here we aimed to review GBS screening policies and IAP implementation worldwide. METHODS: We identified data through (1) systematic literature reviews (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Literature in the Health Sciences in Latin America and the Caribbean [LILACS], World Health Organization library database [WHOLIS], and Scopus) and unpublished data from professional societies and (2) an online survey and searches of policies from medical societies and professionals. We included data on whether an IAP policy was in use, and if so whether it was based on microbiological or clinical risk factors and how these were applied, as well as the estimated coverage (percentage of women receiving IAP where indicated). RESULTS: We received policy information from 95 of 195 (49%) countries. Of these, 60 of 95 (63%) had an IAP policy; 35 of 60 (58%) used microbiological screening, 25 of 60 (42%) used clinical risk factors. Two of 15 (13%) low-income, 4 of 16 (25%) lower-middle–income, 14 of 20 (70%) upper-middle–income, and 40 of 44 (91%) high-income countries had any IAP policy. The remaining 35 of 95 (37%) had no national policy (25/33 from low-income and lower-middle–income countries). Coverage varied considerably; for microbiological screening, median coverage was 80% (range, 20%–95%); for clinical risk factor–based screening, coverage was 29% (range, 10%–50%). Although there were differences in the microbiological screening methods employed, the individual clinical risk factors used were similar. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity in IAP screening policies and coverage worldwide. Alternative global strategies, such as maternal vaccination, are needed to enhance the scope of global prevention of GBS disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5850619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58506192018-03-23 Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review Le Doare, Kirsty O’Driscoll, Megan Turner, Kim Seedat, Farah Russell, Neal J Seale, Anna C Heath, Paul T Lawn, Joy E Baker, Carol J Bartlett, Linda Cutland, Clare Gravett, Michael G Ip, Margaret Madhi, Shabir A Rubens, Craig E Saha, Samir K Schrag, Stephanie Sobanjo-ter Meulen, Ajoke Vekemans, Johan Kampmann, Beate Clin Infect Dis The Burden of Group B Streptococcus Worldwide for Pregnant Women, Stillbirths, and Children BACKGROUND: Intrapartum antibiotic chemoprophylaxis (IAP) prevents most early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) disease. However, there is no description of how IAP is used around the world. This article is the sixth in a series estimating the burden of GBS disease. Here we aimed to review GBS screening policies and IAP implementation worldwide. METHODS: We identified data through (1) systematic literature reviews (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Literature in the Health Sciences in Latin America and the Caribbean [LILACS], World Health Organization library database [WHOLIS], and Scopus) and unpublished data from professional societies and (2) an online survey and searches of policies from medical societies and professionals. We included data on whether an IAP policy was in use, and if so whether it was based on microbiological or clinical risk factors and how these were applied, as well as the estimated coverage (percentage of women receiving IAP where indicated). RESULTS: We received policy information from 95 of 195 (49%) countries. Of these, 60 of 95 (63%) had an IAP policy; 35 of 60 (58%) used microbiological screening, 25 of 60 (42%) used clinical risk factors. Two of 15 (13%) low-income, 4 of 16 (25%) lower-middle–income, 14 of 20 (70%) upper-middle–income, and 40 of 44 (91%) high-income countries had any IAP policy. The remaining 35 of 95 (37%) had no national policy (25/33 from low-income and lower-middle–income countries). Coverage varied considerably; for microbiological screening, median coverage was 80% (range, 20%–95%); for clinical risk factor–based screening, coverage was 29% (range, 10%–50%). Although there were differences in the microbiological screening methods employed, the individual clinical risk factors used were similar. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity in IAP screening policies and coverage worldwide. Alternative global strategies, such as maternal vaccination, are needed to enhance the scope of global prevention of GBS disease. Oxford University Press 2017-11-15 2017-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5850619/ /pubmed/29117324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix654 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle The Burden of Group B Streptococcus Worldwide for Pregnant Women, Stillbirths, and Children
Le Doare, Kirsty
O’Driscoll, Megan
Turner, Kim
Seedat, Farah
Russell, Neal J
Seale, Anna C
Heath, Paul T
Lawn, Joy E
Baker, Carol J
Bartlett, Linda
Cutland, Clare
Gravett, Michael G
Ip, Margaret
Madhi, Shabir A
Rubens, Craig E
Saha, Samir K
Schrag, Stephanie
Sobanjo-ter Meulen, Ajoke
Vekemans, Johan
Kampmann, Beate
Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review
title Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review
title_full Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review
title_short Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review
title_sort intrapartum antibiotic chemoprophylaxis policies for the prevention of group b streptococcal disease worldwide: systematic review
topic The Burden of Group B Streptococcus Worldwide for Pregnant Women, Stillbirths, and Children
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5850619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix654
work_keys_str_mv AT ledoarekirsty intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT odriscollmegan intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT turnerkim intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT seedatfarah intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT russellnealj intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT sealeannac intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT heathpault intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT lawnjoye intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT bakercarolj intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT bartlettlinda intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT cutlandclare intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT gravettmichaelg intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT ipmargaret intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT madhishabira intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT rubenscraige intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT sahasamirk intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT schragstephanie intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT sobanjotermeulenajoke intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT vekemansjohan intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT kampmannbeate intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview
AT intrapartumantibioticchemoprophylaxispoliciesforthepreventionofgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseworldwidesystematicreview