Cargando…

Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial

BACKGROUND: Despite increased attention for palliative care in dementia, recent studies found burdensome symptoms and unmet family caregiver needs in the last phase of life. Feedback is being used to improve the quality of palliative care, but we do not know how effective it is. AIM: To assess the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boogaard, Jannie A, de Vet, Henrica CW, van Soest-Poortvliet, Mirjam C, Anema, Johannes R, Achterberg, Wilco P, van der Steen, Jenny T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29343173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216317750071
_version_ 1783306342596870144
author Boogaard, Jannie A
de Vet, Henrica CW
van Soest-Poortvliet, Mirjam C
Anema, Johannes R
Achterberg, Wilco P
van der Steen, Jenny T
author_facet Boogaard, Jannie A
de Vet, Henrica CW
van Soest-Poortvliet, Mirjam C
Anema, Johannes R
Achterberg, Wilco P
van der Steen, Jenny T
author_sort Boogaard, Jannie A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite increased attention for palliative care in dementia, recent studies found burdensome symptoms and unmet family caregiver needs in the last phase of life. Feedback is being used to improve the quality of palliative care, but we do not know how effective it is. AIM: To assess the effect of two feedback strategies on perceived quality of end-of-life care and comfort in dying nursing home residents with dementia. METHODS: In a cluster-randomized controlled trial, the End-of-Life in Dementia–Satisfaction With Care and the End-of-Life in Dementia–Comfort Assessment in Dying scales were completed by bereaved family caregivers of residents with dementia of 18 Dutch nursing homes. Two feedback strategies, generic feedback with mean End-of-Life in Dementia-scores and feedback with individual (patient-specific) End-of-Life in Dementia-scores, were compared to no feedback provided. The intervention groups discussed End-of-Life in Dementia-ratings in team meetings and formulated actions to improve care. Multi-level analyses assessed effects. RESULTS: A total of 668 families rated the End-of-Life in Dementia–instruments. Compared to no feedback, the generic strategy resulted in lower quality of end-of-life care in unadjusted (B = −1.65, confidence interval = −3.27; −0.21) and adjusted analyses (B = −2.41, confidence interval = −4.07; −0.76), while there was no effect on comfort. The patient-specific strategy did not affect the quality of end-of-life care, but it increased comfort in unadjusted analyses (only, B = 2.20, confidence interval = 0.15; 4.39; adjusted: B = 1.88, confidence interval = −0.34; 4.10). CONCLUSION: Neither feedback strategy improved end-of-life outcome. Perhaps, skills to translate the feedback into care improvement actions were insufficient. Feedback with favorable family ratings might even have triggered opposite effects. Trial number: NTR3942.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5851130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58511302018-03-26 Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial Boogaard, Jannie A de Vet, Henrica CW van Soest-Poortvliet, Mirjam C Anema, Johannes R Achterberg, Wilco P van der Steen, Jenny T Palliat Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Despite increased attention for palliative care in dementia, recent studies found burdensome symptoms and unmet family caregiver needs in the last phase of life. Feedback is being used to improve the quality of palliative care, but we do not know how effective it is. AIM: To assess the effect of two feedback strategies on perceived quality of end-of-life care and comfort in dying nursing home residents with dementia. METHODS: In a cluster-randomized controlled trial, the End-of-Life in Dementia–Satisfaction With Care and the End-of-Life in Dementia–Comfort Assessment in Dying scales were completed by bereaved family caregivers of residents with dementia of 18 Dutch nursing homes. Two feedback strategies, generic feedback with mean End-of-Life in Dementia-scores and feedback with individual (patient-specific) End-of-Life in Dementia-scores, were compared to no feedback provided. The intervention groups discussed End-of-Life in Dementia-ratings in team meetings and formulated actions to improve care. Multi-level analyses assessed effects. RESULTS: A total of 668 families rated the End-of-Life in Dementia–instruments. Compared to no feedback, the generic strategy resulted in lower quality of end-of-life care in unadjusted (B = −1.65, confidence interval = −3.27; −0.21) and adjusted analyses (B = −2.41, confidence interval = −4.07; −0.76), while there was no effect on comfort. The patient-specific strategy did not affect the quality of end-of-life care, but it increased comfort in unadjusted analyses (only, B = 2.20, confidence interval = 0.15; 4.39; adjusted: B = 1.88, confidence interval = −0.34; 4.10). CONCLUSION: Neither feedback strategy improved end-of-life outcome. Perhaps, skills to translate the feedback into care improvement actions were insufficient. Feedback with favorable family ratings might even have triggered opposite effects. Trial number: NTR3942. SAGE Publications 2018-01-18 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5851130/ /pubmed/29343173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216317750071 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Boogaard, Jannie A
de Vet, Henrica CW
van Soest-Poortvliet, Mirjam C
Anema, Johannes R
Achterberg, Wilco P
van der Steen, Jenny T
Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial
title Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial
title_full Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial
title_fullStr Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial
title_short Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial
title_sort effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: a cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29343173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216317750071
work_keys_str_mv AT boogaardjanniea effectsoftwofeedbackinterventionsonendoflifeoutcomesinnursinghomeresidentswithdementiaaclusterrandomizedcontrolledthreearmedtrial
AT devethenricacw effectsoftwofeedbackinterventionsonendoflifeoutcomesinnursinghomeresidentswithdementiaaclusterrandomizedcontrolledthreearmedtrial
AT vansoestpoortvlietmirjamc effectsoftwofeedbackinterventionsonendoflifeoutcomesinnursinghomeresidentswithdementiaaclusterrandomizedcontrolledthreearmedtrial
AT anemajohannesr effectsoftwofeedbackinterventionsonendoflifeoutcomesinnursinghomeresidentswithdementiaaclusterrandomizedcontrolledthreearmedtrial
AT achterbergwilcop effectsoftwofeedbackinterventionsonendoflifeoutcomesinnursinghomeresidentswithdementiaaclusterrandomizedcontrolledthreearmedtrial
AT vandersteenjennyt effectsoftwofeedbackinterventionsonendoflifeoutcomesinnursinghomeresidentswithdementiaaclusterrandomizedcontrolledthreearmedtrial