Cargando…
Fatigue of Dental Implants: Facts and Fallacies
Dental implants experience rare yet problematic mechanical failures such as fracture that are caused, most often, by (time-dependent) metal fatigue. This paper surveys basic evidence about fatigue failure, its identification and the implant’s fatigue performance during service. We first discuss the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj4020016 |
_version_ | 1783306362702266368 |
---|---|
author | Shemtov-Yona, Keren Rittel, Daniel |
author_facet | Shemtov-Yona, Keren Rittel, Daniel |
author_sort | Shemtov-Yona, Keren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dental implants experience rare yet problematic mechanical failures such as fracture that are caused, most often, by (time-dependent) metal fatigue. This paper surveys basic evidence about fatigue failure, its identification and the implant’s fatigue performance during service. We first discuss the concept of dental implant fatigue, starting with a review of basic concepts related to this failure mechanism. The identification of fatigue failures using scanning electron microscopy follows, to show that this stage is fairly well defined. We reiterate that fatigue failure is related to the implant design and its surface condition, together with the widely varying service conditions. The latter are shown to vary to an extent that precludes devising average or representative conditions. The statistical nature of the fatigue test results is emphasized throughout the survey to illustrate the complexity in evaluating the fatigue behavior of dental implants from a design perspective. Today’s fatigue testing of dental implants is limited to ISO 14801 standard requirements, which ensures certification but does not provide any insight for design purposes due to its limited requirements. We introduce and discuss the random spectrum loading procedure as an alternative to evaluate the implant’s performance under more realistic conditions. The concept is illustrated by random fatigue testing in 0.9% saline solution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5851262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58512622018-03-16 Fatigue of Dental Implants: Facts and Fallacies Shemtov-Yona, Keren Rittel, Daniel Dent J (Basel) Article Dental implants experience rare yet problematic mechanical failures such as fracture that are caused, most often, by (time-dependent) metal fatigue. This paper surveys basic evidence about fatigue failure, its identification and the implant’s fatigue performance during service. We first discuss the concept of dental implant fatigue, starting with a review of basic concepts related to this failure mechanism. The identification of fatigue failures using scanning electron microscopy follows, to show that this stage is fairly well defined. We reiterate that fatigue failure is related to the implant design and its surface condition, together with the widely varying service conditions. The latter are shown to vary to an extent that precludes devising average or representative conditions. The statistical nature of the fatigue test results is emphasized throughout the survey to illustrate the complexity in evaluating the fatigue behavior of dental implants from a design perspective. Today’s fatigue testing of dental implants is limited to ISO 14801 standard requirements, which ensures certification but does not provide any insight for design purposes due to its limited requirements. We introduce and discuss the random spectrum loading procedure as an alternative to evaluate the implant’s performance under more realistic conditions. The concept is illustrated by random fatigue testing in 0.9% saline solution. MDPI 2016-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5851262/ /pubmed/29563455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj4020016 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shemtov-Yona, Keren Rittel, Daniel Fatigue of Dental Implants: Facts and Fallacies |
title | Fatigue of Dental Implants: Facts and Fallacies |
title_full | Fatigue of Dental Implants: Facts and Fallacies |
title_fullStr | Fatigue of Dental Implants: Facts and Fallacies |
title_full_unstemmed | Fatigue of Dental Implants: Facts and Fallacies |
title_short | Fatigue of Dental Implants: Facts and Fallacies |
title_sort | fatigue of dental implants: facts and fallacies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj4020016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shemtovyonakeren fatigueofdentalimplantsfactsandfallacies AT ritteldaniel fatigueofdentalimplantsfactsandfallacies |