Cargando…

Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty: When Is It Safe to Operate the Second Hip? A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: Patients with degenerative hip disease frequently present with bilateral involvement that requires surgical management. The main goal when treating these patients is to achieve the maximum efficiency without increasing risk of perioperative complications; therefore, the decision regard...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muskus, Meilyn, Rojas, Jorge, Gutiérrez, Camilo, Guio, Juan, Bonilla, Guillermo, Llinás, Adolfo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3150349
_version_ 1783306367574999040
author Muskus, Meilyn
Rojas, Jorge
Gutiérrez, Camilo
Guio, Juan
Bonilla, Guillermo
Llinás, Adolfo
author_facet Muskus, Meilyn
Rojas, Jorge
Gutiérrez, Camilo
Guio, Juan
Bonilla, Guillermo
Llinás, Adolfo
author_sort Muskus, Meilyn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients with degenerative hip disease frequently present with bilateral involvement that requires surgical management. The main goal when treating these patients is to achieve the maximum efficiency without increasing risk of perioperative complications; therefore, the decision regarding the best moment to operate the second hip becomes relevant. Although studies have addressed this topic, whether a simultaneous or staged surgery should be performed remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine, based on available evidence, the optimum strategy in terms of safety to operate the second hip in patients with bilateral involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis was planned. A systematic review of the literature was performed including clinical trials or observational analytical studies comparing the safety of bilateral arthroplasty performed simultaneously or staged by measuring major and minor complications. The appropriateness of a meta-analysis was evaluated through the detailed analysis of the risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were selected after the systematic review. A wide variability in the methodological designs was found with a critical risk of bias in most of them. Considerable heterogeneity was detected in defining staged surgery in the cointerventions and how the outcomes were defined and measured. In response to these findings, a meta-analysis was considered not appropriate. The results showed no differences in the risk of mortality or systemic complications in young and healthy patients between simultaneous or staged surgeries. However, increased risk of complications for staged surgeries performed during the same hospitalization was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence is very heterogeneous and the quality of evidence is low. The available evidence supports the performance of simultaneous hip arthroplasty in selected patients (not older than 65 years, ASA 1-2, without cardiovascular comorbidities) and suggests the avoidance of staged surgeries within the same hospitalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5851297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58512972018-04-22 Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty: When Is It Safe to Operate the Second Hip? A Systematic Review Muskus, Meilyn Rojas, Jorge Gutiérrez, Camilo Guio, Juan Bonilla, Guillermo Llinás, Adolfo Biomed Res Int Review Article INTRODUCTION: Patients with degenerative hip disease frequently present with bilateral involvement that requires surgical management. The main goal when treating these patients is to achieve the maximum efficiency without increasing risk of perioperative complications; therefore, the decision regarding the best moment to operate the second hip becomes relevant. Although studies have addressed this topic, whether a simultaneous or staged surgery should be performed remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine, based on available evidence, the optimum strategy in terms of safety to operate the second hip in patients with bilateral involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis was planned. A systematic review of the literature was performed including clinical trials or observational analytical studies comparing the safety of bilateral arthroplasty performed simultaneously or staged by measuring major and minor complications. The appropriateness of a meta-analysis was evaluated through the detailed analysis of the risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were selected after the systematic review. A wide variability in the methodological designs was found with a critical risk of bias in most of them. Considerable heterogeneity was detected in defining staged surgery in the cointerventions and how the outcomes were defined and measured. In response to these findings, a meta-analysis was considered not appropriate. The results showed no differences in the risk of mortality or systemic complications in young and healthy patients between simultaneous or staged surgeries. However, increased risk of complications for staged surgeries performed during the same hospitalization was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence is very heterogeneous and the quality of evidence is low. The available evidence supports the performance of simultaneous hip arthroplasty in selected patients (not older than 65 years, ASA 1-2, without cardiovascular comorbidities) and suggests the avoidance of staged surgeries within the same hospitalization. Hindawi 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5851297/ /pubmed/29682533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3150349 Text en Copyright © 2018 Meilyn Muskus et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Muskus, Meilyn
Rojas, Jorge
Gutiérrez, Camilo
Guio, Juan
Bonilla, Guillermo
Llinás, Adolfo
Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty: When Is It Safe to Operate the Second Hip? A Systematic Review
title Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty: When Is It Safe to Operate the Second Hip? A Systematic Review
title_full Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty: When Is It Safe to Operate the Second Hip? A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty: When Is It Safe to Operate the Second Hip? A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty: When Is It Safe to Operate the Second Hip? A Systematic Review
title_short Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty: When Is It Safe to Operate the Second Hip? A Systematic Review
title_sort bilateral hip arthroplasty: when is it safe to operate the second hip? a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3150349
work_keys_str_mv AT muskusmeilyn bilateralhiparthroplastywhenisitsafetooperatethesecondhipasystematicreview
AT rojasjorge bilateralhiparthroplastywhenisitsafetooperatethesecondhipasystematicreview
AT gutierrezcamilo bilateralhiparthroplastywhenisitsafetooperatethesecondhipasystematicreview
AT guiojuan bilateralhiparthroplastywhenisitsafetooperatethesecondhipasystematicreview
AT bonillaguillermo bilateralhiparthroplastywhenisitsafetooperatethesecondhipasystematicreview
AT llinasadolfo bilateralhiparthroplastywhenisitsafetooperatethesecondhipasystematicreview