Cargando…

Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging

OBJECTIVE: Kinetic modeling of dynamic (11)C-acetate PET imaging provides quantitative information for myocardium assessment. The quality and quantitation of PET images are known to be dependent on PET reconstruction methods. This study aims to investigate the impacts of reconstruction algorithms on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Ximin, Li, Nan, Ding, Haiyan, Dang, Yonghong, Hu, Guilan, Liu, Shuai, Cui, Jie, Zhang, Yue, Li, Fang, Zhang, Hui, Huo, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9193403
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Kinetic modeling of dynamic (11)C-acetate PET imaging provides quantitative information for myocardium assessment. The quality and quantitation of PET images are known to be dependent on PET reconstruction methods. This study aims to investigate the impacts of reconstruction algorithms on the quantitative analysis of dynamic (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. METHODS: Suspected alcoholic cardiomyopathy patients (N = 24) underwent (11)C-acetate dynamic PET imaging after low dose CT scan. PET images were reconstructed using four algorithms: filtered backprojection (FBP), ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM with time-of-flight (TOF), and OSEM with both time-of-flight and point-spread-function (TPSF). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) at different time points were compared among images reconstructed using the four algorithms. Time-activity curves (TACs) in myocardium and blood pools of ventricles were generated from the dynamic image series. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) were derived using a 1-tissue-compartment model for kinetic modeling of cardiac flow from (11)C-acetate PET images. RESULTS: Significant image quality improvement was found in the images reconstructed using iterative OSEM-type algorithms (OSME, TOF, and TPSF) compared with FBP. However, no statistical differences in SUVs were observed among the four reconstruction methods at the selected time points. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) also exhibited no statistical difference among the four reconstruction algorithms in terms of mean value and standard deviation. However, for the correlation analysis, OSEM reconstruction presented relatively higher residual in correlation with FBP reconstruction compared with TOF and TPSF reconstruction, and TOF and TPSF reconstruction were highly correlated with each other. CONCLUSION: All the tested reconstruction algorithms performed similarly for quantitative analysis of (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. TOF and TPSF yielded highly consistent kinetic parameter results with superior image quality compared with FBP. OSEM was relatively less reliable. Both TOF and TPSF were recommended for cardiac (11)C-acetate kinetic analysis.