Cargando…

Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging

OBJECTIVE: Kinetic modeling of dynamic (11)C-acetate PET imaging provides quantitative information for myocardium assessment. The quality and quantitation of PET images are known to be dependent on PET reconstruction methods. This study aims to investigate the impacts of reconstruction algorithms on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Ximin, Li, Nan, Ding, Haiyan, Dang, Yonghong, Hu, Guilan, Liu, Shuai, Cui, Jie, Zhang, Yue, Li, Fang, Zhang, Hui, Huo, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9193403
_version_ 1783306371982163968
author Shi, Ximin
Li, Nan
Ding, Haiyan
Dang, Yonghong
Hu, Guilan
Liu, Shuai
Cui, Jie
Zhang, Yue
Li, Fang
Zhang, Hui
Huo, Li
author_facet Shi, Ximin
Li, Nan
Ding, Haiyan
Dang, Yonghong
Hu, Guilan
Liu, Shuai
Cui, Jie
Zhang, Yue
Li, Fang
Zhang, Hui
Huo, Li
author_sort Shi, Ximin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Kinetic modeling of dynamic (11)C-acetate PET imaging provides quantitative information for myocardium assessment. The quality and quantitation of PET images are known to be dependent on PET reconstruction methods. This study aims to investigate the impacts of reconstruction algorithms on the quantitative analysis of dynamic (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. METHODS: Suspected alcoholic cardiomyopathy patients (N = 24) underwent (11)C-acetate dynamic PET imaging after low dose CT scan. PET images were reconstructed using four algorithms: filtered backprojection (FBP), ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM with time-of-flight (TOF), and OSEM with both time-of-flight and point-spread-function (TPSF). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) at different time points were compared among images reconstructed using the four algorithms. Time-activity curves (TACs) in myocardium and blood pools of ventricles were generated from the dynamic image series. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) were derived using a 1-tissue-compartment model for kinetic modeling of cardiac flow from (11)C-acetate PET images. RESULTS: Significant image quality improvement was found in the images reconstructed using iterative OSEM-type algorithms (OSME, TOF, and TPSF) compared with FBP. However, no statistical differences in SUVs were observed among the four reconstruction methods at the selected time points. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) also exhibited no statistical difference among the four reconstruction algorithms in terms of mean value and standard deviation. However, for the correlation analysis, OSEM reconstruction presented relatively higher residual in correlation with FBP reconstruction compared with TOF and TPSF reconstruction, and TOF and TPSF reconstruction were highly correlated with each other. CONCLUSION: All the tested reconstruction algorithms performed similarly for quantitative analysis of (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. TOF and TPSF yielded highly consistent kinetic parameter results with superior image quality compared with FBP. OSEM was relatively less reliable. Both TOF and TPSF were recommended for cardiac (11)C-acetate kinetic analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5851317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58513172018-04-22 Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging Shi, Ximin Li, Nan Ding, Haiyan Dang, Yonghong Hu, Guilan Liu, Shuai Cui, Jie Zhang, Yue Li, Fang Zhang, Hui Huo, Li Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article OBJECTIVE: Kinetic modeling of dynamic (11)C-acetate PET imaging provides quantitative information for myocardium assessment. The quality and quantitation of PET images are known to be dependent on PET reconstruction methods. This study aims to investigate the impacts of reconstruction algorithms on the quantitative analysis of dynamic (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. METHODS: Suspected alcoholic cardiomyopathy patients (N = 24) underwent (11)C-acetate dynamic PET imaging after low dose CT scan. PET images were reconstructed using four algorithms: filtered backprojection (FBP), ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM with time-of-flight (TOF), and OSEM with both time-of-flight and point-spread-function (TPSF). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) at different time points were compared among images reconstructed using the four algorithms. Time-activity curves (TACs) in myocardium and blood pools of ventricles were generated from the dynamic image series. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) were derived using a 1-tissue-compartment model for kinetic modeling of cardiac flow from (11)C-acetate PET images. RESULTS: Significant image quality improvement was found in the images reconstructed using iterative OSEM-type algorithms (OSME, TOF, and TPSF) compared with FBP. However, no statistical differences in SUVs were observed among the four reconstruction methods at the selected time points. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) also exhibited no statistical difference among the four reconstruction algorithms in terms of mean value and standard deviation. However, for the correlation analysis, OSEM reconstruction presented relatively higher residual in correlation with FBP reconstruction compared with TOF and TPSF reconstruction, and TOF and TPSF reconstruction were highly correlated with each other. CONCLUSION: All the tested reconstruction algorithms performed similarly for quantitative analysis of (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. TOF and TPSF yielded highly consistent kinetic parameter results with superior image quality compared with FBP. OSEM was relatively less reliable. Both TOF and TPSF were recommended for cardiac (11)C-acetate kinetic analysis. Hindawi 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5851317/ /pubmed/29681784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9193403 Text en Copyright © 2018 Ximin Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shi, Ximin
Li, Nan
Ding, Haiyan
Dang, Yonghong
Hu, Guilan
Liu, Shuai
Cui, Jie
Zhang, Yue
Li, Fang
Zhang, Hui
Huo, Li
Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging
title Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging
title_full Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging
title_fullStr Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging
title_short Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging
title_sort comparison among reconstruction algorithms for quantitative analysis of (11)c-acetate cardiac pet imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9193403
work_keys_str_mv AT shiximin comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT linan comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT dinghaiyan comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT dangyonghong comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT huguilan comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT liushuai comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT cuijie comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT zhangyue comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT lifang comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT zhanghui comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging
AT huoli comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging