Cargando…
Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging
OBJECTIVE: Kinetic modeling of dynamic (11)C-acetate PET imaging provides quantitative information for myocardium assessment. The quality and quantitation of PET images are known to be dependent on PET reconstruction methods. This study aims to investigate the impacts of reconstruction algorithms on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9193403 |
_version_ | 1783306371982163968 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Ximin Li, Nan Ding, Haiyan Dang, Yonghong Hu, Guilan Liu, Shuai Cui, Jie Zhang, Yue Li, Fang Zhang, Hui Huo, Li |
author_facet | Shi, Ximin Li, Nan Ding, Haiyan Dang, Yonghong Hu, Guilan Liu, Shuai Cui, Jie Zhang, Yue Li, Fang Zhang, Hui Huo, Li |
author_sort | Shi, Ximin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Kinetic modeling of dynamic (11)C-acetate PET imaging provides quantitative information for myocardium assessment. The quality and quantitation of PET images are known to be dependent on PET reconstruction methods. This study aims to investigate the impacts of reconstruction algorithms on the quantitative analysis of dynamic (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. METHODS: Suspected alcoholic cardiomyopathy patients (N = 24) underwent (11)C-acetate dynamic PET imaging after low dose CT scan. PET images were reconstructed using four algorithms: filtered backprojection (FBP), ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM with time-of-flight (TOF), and OSEM with both time-of-flight and point-spread-function (TPSF). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) at different time points were compared among images reconstructed using the four algorithms. Time-activity curves (TACs) in myocardium and blood pools of ventricles were generated from the dynamic image series. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) were derived using a 1-tissue-compartment model for kinetic modeling of cardiac flow from (11)C-acetate PET images. RESULTS: Significant image quality improvement was found in the images reconstructed using iterative OSEM-type algorithms (OSME, TOF, and TPSF) compared with FBP. However, no statistical differences in SUVs were observed among the four reconstruction methods at the selected time points. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) also exhibited no statistical difference among the four reconstruction algorithms in terms of mean value and standard deviation. However, for the correlation analysis, OSEM reconstruction presented relatively higher residual in correlation with FBP reconstruction compared with TOF and TPSF reconstruction, and TOF and TPSF reconstruction were highly correlated with each other. CONCLUSION: All the tested reconstruction algorithms performed similarly for quantitative analysis of (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. TOF and TPSF yielded highly consistent kinetic parameter results with superior image quality compared with FBP. OSEM was relatively less reliable. Both TOF and TPSF were recommended for cardiac (11)C-acetate kinetic analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5851317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58513172018-04-22 Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging Shi, Ximin Li, Nan Ding, Haiyan Dang, Yonghong Hu, Guilan Liu, Shuai Cui, Jie Zhang, Yue Li, Fang Zhang, Hui Huo, Li Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article OBJECTIVE: Kinetic modeling of dynamic (11)C-acetate PET imaging provides quantitative information for myocardium assessment. The quality and quantitation of PET images are known to be dependent on PET reconstruction methods. This study aims to investigate the impacts of reconstruction algorithms on the quantitative analysis of dynamic (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. METHODS: Suspected alcoholic cardiomyopathy patients (N = 24) underwent (11)C-acetate dynamic PET imaging after low dose CT scan. PET images were reconstructed using four algorithms: filtered backprojection (FBP), ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM with time-of-flight (TOF), and OSEM with both time-of-flight and point-spread-function (TPSF). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) at different time points were compared among images reconstructed using the four algorithms. Time-activity curves (TACs) in myocardium and blood pools of ventricles were generated from the dynamic image series. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) were derived using a 1-tissue-compartment model for kinetic modeling of cardiac flow from (11)C-acetate PET images. RESULTS: Significant image quality improvement was found in the images reconstructed using iterative OSEM-type algorithms (OSME, TOF, and TPSF) compared with FBP. However, no statistical differences in SUVs were observed among the four reconstruction methods at the selected time points. Kinetic parameters K(1) and k(2) also exhibited no statistical difference among the four reconstruction algorithms in terms of mean value and standard deviation. However, for the correlation analysis, OSEM reconstruction presented relatively higher residual in correlation with FBP reconstruction compared with TOF and TPSF reconstruction, and TOF and TPSF reconstruction were highly correlated with each other. CONCLUSION: All the tested reconstruction algorithms performed similarly for quantitative analysis of (11)C-acetate cardiac PET imaging. TOF and TPSF yielded highly consistent kinetic parameter results with superior image quality compared with FBP. OSEM was relatively less reliable. Both TOF and TPSF were recommended for cardiac (11)C-acetate kinetic analysis. Hindawi 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5851317/ /pubmed/29681784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9193403 Text en Copyright © 2018 Ximin Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shi, Ximin Li, Nan Ding, Haiyan Dang, Yonghong Hu, Guilan Liu, Shuai Cui, Jie Zhang, Yue Li, Fang Zhang, Hui Huo, Li Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging |
title | Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging |
title_full | Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging |
title_fullStr | Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging |
title_short | Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of (11)C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging |
title_sort | comparison among reconstruction algorithms for quantitative analysis of (11)c-acetate cardiac pet imaging |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9193403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shiximin comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT linan comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT dinghaiyan comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT dangyonghong comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT huguilan comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT liushuai comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT cuijie comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT zhangyue comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT lifang comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT zhanghui comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging AT huoli comparisonamongreconstructionalgorithmsforquantitativeanalysisof11cacetatecardiacpetimaging |