Cargando…

Emergency Department (ED), ED Observation, Day Hospital, and Hospital Admissions for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease

INTRODUCTION: Use of alternative venues to manage uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), such as a day hospital (DH) or ED observation unit, for patients with sickle cell anemia, may significantly reduce admission rates, which may subsequently reduce 30-day readmission rates. METHODS: In the con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cline, David M., Silva, Susan, Freiermuth, Caroline E., Thornton, Victoria, Tanabe, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560059
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.9.35422
_version_ 1783306394528645120
author Cline, David M.
Silva, Susan
Freiermuth, Caroline E.
Thornton, Victoria
Tanabe, Paula
author_facet Cline, David M.
Silva, Susan
Freiermuth, Caroline E.
Thornton, Victoria
Tanabe, Paula
author_sort Cline, David M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Use of alternative venues to manage uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), such as a day hospital (DH) or ED observation unit, for patients with sickle cell anemia, may significantly reduce admission rates, which may subsequently reduce 30-day readmission rates. METHODS: In the context of a two-institution quality improvement project to implement best practices for management of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) VOC, we prospectively compared acute care encounters for utilization of 1) emergency department (ED); 2) ED observation unit; 3) DH, and 4) hospital admission, of two different patient cohorts with SCD presenting to our two study sites. Using a representative sample of patients from each institution, we also tabulated SCD patient visits or admissions to outside hospitals within 20 miles of the patients’ home institutions. RESULTS: Over 30 months 427 patients (297 at Site 1 and 130 at Site 2) initiated 4,740 institutional visits, totaling 6,627 different acute care encounters, including combinations of encounters. The range of encounters varied from a low of 0 (203 of 500 patients [40.6%] at Site 1; 65 of 195 patients [33.3%] at Site 2), and a high of 152 (5/month) acute care encounters for one patient at Site 2. Patients at Site 2 were more likely to be admitted to the hospital during the study period (88.4% vs. 74.4%, p=0.0011) and have an ED visit (96.9% vs. 85.5%, p=0.0002). DH was used more frequently at Site 1 (1.207 encounters for 297 patients at Site 1, vs. 199 encounters for 130 patients at Site 2), and ED observation was used at Site 1 only. Thirty-five percent of patients visited hospitals outside their home academic center. CONCLUSION: In this 30-month assessment of two sickle cell cohorts, healthcare utilization varied dramatically between individual patients. One cohort had more hospital admissions and ED encounters, while the other cohort had more day hospital encounters and used a sickle cell disease observation VOC protocol. One-third of patients sampled visited hospitals for acute care outside of their care providers’ institutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5851504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58515042018-03-20 Emergency Department (ED), ED Observation, Day Hospital, and Hospital Admissions for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Cline, David M. Silva, Susan Freiermuth, Caroline E. Thornton, Victoria Tanabe, Paula West J Emerg Med Health Outcomes INTRODUCTION: Use of alternative venues to manage uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), such as a day hospital (DH) or ED observation unit, for patients with sickle cell anemia, may significantly reduce admission rates, which may subsequently reduce 30-day readmission rates. METHODS: In the context of a two-institution quality improvement project to implement best practices for management of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) VOC, we prospectively compared acute care encounters for utilization of 1) emergency department (ED); 2) ED observation unit; 3) DH, and 4) hospital admission, of two different patient cohorts with SCD presenting to our two study sites. Using a representative sample of patients from each institution, we also tabulated SCD patient visits or admissions to outside hospitals within 20 miles of the patients’ home institutions. RESULTS: Over 30 months 427 patients (297 at Site 1 and 130 at Site 2) initiated 4,740 institutional visits, totaling 6,627 different acute care encounters, including combinations of encounters. The range of encounters varied from a low of 0 (203 of 500 patients [40.6%] at Site 1; 65 of 195 patients [33.3%] at Site 2), and a high of 152 (5/month) acute care encounters for one patient at Site 2. Patients at Site 2 were more likely to be admitted to the hospital during the study period (88.4% vs. 74.4%, p=0.0011) and have an ED visit (96.9% vs. 85.5%, p=0.0002). DH was used more frequently at Site 1 (1.207 encounters for 297 patients at Site 1, vs. 199 encounters for 130 patients at Site 2), and ED observation was used at Site 1 only. Thirty-five percent of patients visited hospitals outside their home academic center. CONCLUSION: In this 30-month assessment of two sickle cell cohorts, healthcare utilization varied dramatically between individual patients. One cohort had more hospital admissions and ED encounters, while the other cohort had more day hospital encounters and used a sickle cell disease observation VOC protocol. One-third of patients sampled visited hospitals for acute care outside of their care providers’ institutions. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2018-03 2018-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5851504/ /pubmed/29560059 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.9.35422 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Cline et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Outcomes
Cline, David M.
Silva, Susan
Freiermuth, Caroline E.
Thornton, Victoria
Tanabe, Paula
Emergency Department (ED), ED Observation, Day Hospital, and Hospital Admissions for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease
title Emergency Department (ED), ED Observation, Day Hospital, and Hospital Admissions for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease
title_full Emergency Department (ED), ED Observation, Day Hospital, and Hospital Admissions for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease
title_fullStr Emergency Department (ED), ED Observation, Day Hospital, and Hospital Admissions for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Department (ED), ED Observation, Day Hospital, and Hospital Admissions for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease
title_short Emergency Department (ED), ED Observation, Day Hospital, and Hospital Admissions for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease
title_sort emergency department (ed), ed observation, day hospital, and hospital admissions for adults with sickle cell disease
topic Health Outcomes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560059
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.9.35422
work_keys_str_mv AT clinedavidm emergencydepartmentededobservationdayhospitalandhospitaladmissionsforadultswithsicklecelldisease
AT silvasusan emergencydepartmentededobservationdayhospitalandhospitaladmissionsforadultswithsicklecelldisease
AT freiermuthcarolinee emergencydepartmentededobservationdayhospitalandhospitaladmissionsforadultswithsicklecelldisease
AT thorntonvictoria emergencydepartmentededobservationdayhospitalandhospitaladmissionsforadultswithsicklecelldisease
AT tanabepaula emergencydepartmentededobservationdayhospitalandhospitaladmissionsforadultswithsicklecelldisease