Cargando…

Test of cure, retesting and extragenital testing practices for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among general practitioners in different socioeconomic status areas: A retrospective cohort study, 2011-2016

BACKGROUND: For Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), a test of cure (TOC) within 3–5 weeks is not recommended. International guidelines differ in advising a Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) TOC. Retesting CT and NG positives within 3–12 months is recommended in international guidelines. We assessed TOC and retesti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijers, Juliën N. A. P., van Liere, Geneviève A. F. S., Hoebe, Christian J. P. A., Cals, Jochen W. L., Wolffs, Petra F. G., Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194351
_version_ 1783306425964953600
author Wijers, Juliën N. A. P.
van Liere, Geneviève A. F. S.
Hoebe, Christian J. P. A.
Cals, Jochen W. L.
Wolffs, Petra F. G.
Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M.
author_facet Wijers, Juliën N. A. P.
van Liere, Geneviève A. F. S.
Hoebe, Christian J. P. A.
Cals, Jochen W. L.
Wolffs, Petra F. G.
Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M.
author_sort Wijers, Juliën N. A. P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), a test of cure (TOC) within 3–5 weeks is not recommended. International guidelines differ in advising a Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) TOC. Retesting CT and NG positives within 3–12 months is recommended in international guidelines. We assessed TOC and retesting practices including extragenital testing in general practitioner (GP) practices located in different socioeconomic status (SES) areas to inform and optimize local test practices. METHODS: Laboratory data of 48 Dutch GP practices between January 2011 and July 2016 were used. Based on a patient’s first positive CT or NG test, the proportion of TOC (<3 months) and retests (3–12 months) were calculated. Patient- and GP-related factors were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: For CT (n = 622), 20% had a TOC and 24% had a retest at the GP practice. GP practices in low SES areas were more likely to perform a CT TOC (OR:1.8;95%CI:1.1–3.1). Younger patients (<25 years) were more likely to have a CT TOC (OR:1.6;95%CI:1.0–2.4). For CT (n = 622), 2.4% had a TOC and 6.1% had a retest at another STI care provider. For NG (n = 73), 25% had a TOC and 15% had a retest at the GP practice. For NG (n = 73), 2.7% had a TOC and 12.3% had a retest at another STI care provider. In only 0.3% of the consultations patients were tested on extragenital sites. CONCLUSION: Almost 20% of the patients returned for a CT TOC, especially at GP practices in low SES areas. For NG, 1 out of 4 patients returned for a TOC. Retesting rates were low for both CT (24%) and NG (15%), (re)infections including extragenital infections may be missed. Efforts are required to focus TOC and increase retesting practices of GPs in order to improve CT/NG control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5851648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58516482018-03-23 Test of cure, retesting and extragenital testing practices for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among general practitioners in different socioeconomic status areas: A retrospective cohort study, 2011-2016 Wijers, Juliën N. A. P. van Liere, Geneviève A. F. S. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. Cals, Jochen W. L. Wolffs, Petra F. G. Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: For Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), a test of cure (TOC) within 3–5 weeks is not recommended. International guidelines differ in advising a Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) TOC. Retesting CT and NG positives within 3–12 months is recommended in international guidelines. We assessed TOC and retesting practices including extragenital testing in general practitioner (GP) practices located in different socioeconomic status (SES) areas to inform and optimize local test practices. METHODS: Laboratory data of 48 Dutch GP practices between January 2011 and July 2016 were used. Based on a patient’s first positive CT or NG test, the proportion of TOC (<3 months) and retests (3–12 months) were calculated. Patient- and GP-related factors were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: For CT (n = 622), 20% had a TOC and 24% had a retest at the GP practice. GP practices in low SES areas were more likely to perform a CT TOC (OR:1.8;95%CI:1.1–3.1). Younger patients (<25 years) were more likely to have a CT TOC (OR:1.6;95%CI:1.0–2.4). For CT (n = 622), 2.4% had a TOC and 6.1% had a retest at another STI care provider. For NG (n = 73), 25% had a TOC and 15% had a retest at the GP practice. For NG (n = 73), 2.7% had a TOC and 12.3% had a retest at another STI care provider. In only 0.3% of the consultations patients were tested on extragenital sites. CONCLUSION: Almost 20% of the patients returned for a CT TOC, especially at GP practices in low SES areas. For NG, 1 out of 4 patients returned for a TOC. Retesting rates were low for both CT (24%) and NG (15%), (re)infections including extragenital infections may be missed. Efforts are required to focus TOC and increase retesting practices of GPs in order to improve CT/NG control. Public Library of Science 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5851648/ /pubmed/29538469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194351 Text en © 2018 Wijers et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wijers, Juliën N. A. P.
van Liere, Geneviève A. F. S.
Hoebe, Christian J. P. A.
Cals, Jochen W. L.
Wolffs, Petra F. G.
Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M.
Test of cure, retesting and extragenital testing practices for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among general practitioners in different socioeconomic status areas: A retrospective cohort study, 2011-2016
title Test of cure, retesting and extragenital testing practices for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among general practitioners in different socioeconomic status areas: A retrospective cohort study, 2011-2016
title_full Test of cure, retesting and extragenital testing practices for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among general practitioners in different socioeconomic status areas: A retrospective cohort study, 2011-2016
title_fullStr Test of cure, retesting and extragenital testing practices for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among general practitioners in different socioeconomic status areas: A retrospective cohort study, 2011-2016
title_full_unstemmed Test of cure, retesting and extragenital testing practices for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among general practitioners in different socioeconomic status areas: A retrospective cohort study, 2011-2016
title_short Test of cure, retesting and extragenital testing practices for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among general practitioners in different socioeconomic status areas: A retrospective cohort study, 2011-2016
title_sort test of cure, retesting and extragenital testing practices for chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae among general practitioners in different socioeconomic status areas: a retrospective cohort study, 2011-2016
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194351
work_keys_str_mv AT wijersjuliennap testofcureretestingandextragenitaltestingpracticesforchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeamonggeneralpractitionersindifferentsocioeconomicstatusareasaretrospectivecohortstudy20112016
AT vanlieregenevieveafs testofcureretestingandextragenitaltestingpracticesforchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeamonggeneralpractitionersindifferentsocioeconomicstatusareasaretrospectivecohortstudy20112016
AT hoebechristianjpa testofcureretestingandextragenitaltestingpracticesforchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeamonggeneralpractitionersindifferentsocioeconomicstatusareasaretrospectivecohortstudy20112016
AT calsjochenwl testofcureretestingandextragenitaltestingpracticesforchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeamonggeneralpractitionersindifferentsocioeconomicstatusareasaretrospectivecohortstudy20112016
AT wolffspetrafg testofcureretestingandextragenitaltestingpracticesforchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeamonggeneralpractitionersindifferentsocioeconomicstatusareasaretrospectivecohortstudy20112016
AT dukersmuijrersnicolehtm testofcureretestingandextragenitaltestingpracticesforchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeamonggeneralpractitionersindifferentsocioeconomicstatusareasaretrospectivecohortstudy20112016