Cargando…
MRI and CT contrast media extravasation: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: This systematic review combines data from multiple papers on contrast media extravasation to identify factors contributing to increased extravasation risk. METHODS: Data were extracted from 17 papers reporting 2191 extravasations in 1,104,872 patients (0.2%) undergoing computed tomograph...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010055 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: This systematic review combines data from multiple papers on contrast media extravasation to identify factors contributing to increased extravasation risk. METHODS: Data were extracted from 17 papers reporting 2191 extravasations in 1,104,872 patients (0.2%) undergoing computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: Extravasation rates were 0.045% for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) and nearly 6-fold higher, 0.26% for iodinated contrast agents. Factors associated with increased contrast media extravasations included: older age, female gender, using an existing intravenous (IV) instead of placing a new IV in radiology, in-patient status, use of automated power injection, high injection rates, catheter location, and failing to warm up the more viscous contrast media to body temperature. CONCLUSION: Contrast media extravasation is infrequent but nearly 6 times less frequent with GBCA for MRI compared with iodinated contrast used in CT. |
---|