Cargando…

MRI and CT contrast media extravasation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: This systematic review combines data from multiple papers on contrast media extravasation to identify factors contributing to increased extravasation risk. METHODS: Data were extracted from 17 papers reporting 2191 extravasations in 1,104,872 patients (0.2%) undergoing computed tomograph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heshmatzadeh Behzadi, Ashkan, Farooq, Zerwa, Newhouse, Jeffery H., Prince, Martin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010055
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This systematic review combines data from multiple papers on contrast media extravasation to identify factors contributing to increased extravasation risk. METHODS: Data were extracted from 17 papers reporting 2191 extravasations in 1,104,872 patients (0.2%) undergoing computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: Extravasation rates were 0.045% for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) and nearly 6-fold higher, 0.26% for iodinated contrast agents. Factors associated with increased contrast media extravasations included: older age, female gender, using an existing intravenous (IV) instead of placing a new IV in radiology, in-patient status, use of automated power injection, high injection rates, catheter location, and failing to warm up the more viscous contrast media to body temperature. CONCLUSION: Contrast media extravasation is infrequent but nearly 6 times less frequent with GBCA for MRI compared with iodinated contrast used in CT.