Cargando…

The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying narrow-band (ME-NBI) for gastric cancerous lesions, but the results are inconsistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the accuracy of ME-NBI in distinguishing between cancerous and noncan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Fan, Wu, Liucheng, Huang, Mingwei, Jin, Qinwen, Qin, Yuzhou, Chen, Jiansi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009780
_version_ 1783306444364316672
author Zhou, Fan
Wu, Liucheng
Huang, Mingwei
Jin, Qinwen
Qin, Yuzhou
Chen, Jiansi
author_facet Zhou, Fan
Wu, Liucheng
Huang, Mingwei
Jin, Qinwen
Qin, Yuzhou
Chen, Jiansi
author_sort Zhou, Fan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying narrow-band (ME-NBI) for gastric cancerous lesions, but the results are inconsistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the accuracy of ME-NBI in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted until October 2016 in PubMed, Embase by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity. Two authors independently evaluated studies for inclusion, rated methodological quality, and abstracted relevant data. Meta-analytic method was used to construct summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and pooled sensitivity, specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Nine studies enrolling 5398 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78–93%), 96% (95% CI: 91–98%), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.97. There was a large heterogeneity between the included studies. Studies with lesions ≤ 10 mm still had a high pooled sensitivity of 81% (95% CI: 73–90%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI: 95–100%). Studies which analyzed resected specimens had a sensitivity of 91% (95 CI: 82–99%) and specificity of 88% (95% CI: 83–94%), and studies which analyzed biopsied specimens had a sensitivity of 85% (95 CI: 74–96%) and specificity of 99% (95% CI: 98–99%). CONCLUSIONS: ME-NBI is highly accurate and consistent to distinguish between gastric cancerous and noncancerous lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5851730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58517302018-03-21 The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions: A meta-analysis Zhou, Fan Wu, Liucheng Huang, Mingwei Jin, Qinwen Qin, Yuzhou Chen, Jiansi Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying narrow-band (ME-NBI) for gastric cancerous lesions, but the results are inconsistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the accuracy of ME-NBI in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted until October 2016 in PubMed, Embase by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity. Two authors independently evaluated studies for inclusion, rated methodological quality, and abstracted relevant data. Meta-analytic method was used to construct summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and pooled sensitivity, specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Nine studies enrolling 5398 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78–93%), 96% (95% CI: 91–98%), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.97. There was a large heterogeneity between the included studies. Studies with lesions ≤ 10 mm still had a high pooled sensitivity of 81% (95% CI: 73–90%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI: 95–100%). Studies which analyzed resected specimens had a sensitivity of 91% (95 CI: 82–99%) and specificity of 88% (95% CI: 83–94%), and studies which analyzed biopsied specimens had a sensitivity of 85% (95 CI: 74–96%) and specificity of 99% (95% CI: 98–99%). CONCLUSIONS: ME-NBI is highly accurate and consistent to distinguish between gastric cancerous and noncancerous lesions. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5851730/ /pubmed/29489678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009780 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Zhou, Fan
Wu, Liucheng
Huang, Mingwei
Jin, Qinwen
Qin, Yuzhou
Chen, Jiansi
The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions: A meta-analysis
title The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions: A meta-analysis
title_full The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions: A meta-analysis
title_short The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions: A meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (me-nbi) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions: a meta-analysis
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009780
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoufan theaccuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT wuliucheng theaccuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT huangmingwei theaccuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT jinqinwen theaccuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT qinyuzhou theaccuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT chenjiansi theaccuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT zhoufan accuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT wuliucheng accuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT huangmingwei accuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT jinqinwen accuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT qinyuzhou accuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis
AT chenjiansi accuracyofmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingmenbiindistinguishingbetweencancerousandnoncancerousgastriclesionsametaanalysis