Cargando…
Reliability and validity of the Chinese CECA10 questionnaire for Chinese patients with condyloma acuminata
Condyloma acuminata (CA) is a sexually transmitted disease that affects quality of life (QOL). CECA10 is an English-language questionnaire for assessing QOL in patients with CA, but there is no equivalent in China. This study aimed to develop a validated and reliable Chinese version of CECA10. The C...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009917 |
_version_ | 1783306446956396544 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Xinying Wu, Xinjuan Guo, Aimin Zhao, Yanwei |
author_facet | Guo, Xinying Wu, Xinjuan Guo, Aimin Zhao, Yanwei |
author_sort | Guo, Xinying |
collection | PubMed |
description | Condyloma acuminata (CA) is a sexually transmitted disease that affects quality of life (QOL). CECA10 is an English-language questionnaire for assessing QOL in patients with CA, but there is no equivalent in China. This study aimed to develop a validated and reliable Chinese version of CECA10. The Chinese CECA10 was developed from the English version by forward translation, back translation, comparison with the original, cultural adjustments, and a pre-test (5 patients). The Chinese CECA10 and EuroQol Five Dimensions Three Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) was administered to patients with CA. Content validity (item/scale content validity indexes, I-CVI/S-CVI), test–retest reliability (intraclass coefficient, ICC), internal consistency (Cronbach α), criterion validity (comparison with the Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQL, using Spearman correlation analysis), construct validity (exploratory factor analysis), and discriminant validity (between subgroups based on number of warts, number of recurrences, or number of sites involved) were assessed. The Chinese CECA10 had good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.98, P < .001), internal consistency (Cronbach α values of 0.88, 0.84, and 0.83 for the total questionnaire, psychological dimension, and sexual dimension, respectively), content validity (I-CVI = 1 for all items), and criterion validity (r = -0.50, P < .001). Exploratory factor analysis extracted 2 factors with a cumulative contribution of 61.75%; the factor loading with each item was >0.4. Discriminant validity was not high. The mean CECA10 and EQ-VAS scores of 211 patients with CA (28.19 ± 7.16 years; 139 males) were 34.56 ± 19.01 and 64.64 ± 19.28, respectively. The Chinese CECA10 has good reliability and validity for evaluating the QOL of Chinese patients with CA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5851741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58517412018-03-21 Reliability and validity of the Chinese CECA10 questionnaire for Chinese patients with condyloma acuminata Guo, Xinying Wu, Xinjuan Guo, Aimin Zhao, Yanwei Medicine (Baltimore) 3700 Condyloma acuminata (CA) is a sexually transmitted disease that affects quality of life (QOL). CECA10 is an English-language questionnaire for assessing QOL in patients with CA, but there is no equivalent in China. This study aimed to develop a validated and reliable Chinese version of CECA10. The Chinese CECA10 was developed from the English version by forward translation, back translation, comparison with the original, cultural adjustments, and a pre-test (5 patients). The Chinese CECA10 and EuroQol Five Dimensions Three Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) was administered to patients with CA. Content validity (item/scale content validity indexes, I-CVI/S-CVI), test–retest reliability (intraclass coefficient, ICC), internal consistency (Cronbach α), criterion validity (comparison with the Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQL, using Spearman correlation analysis), construct validity (exploratory factor analysis), and discriminant validity (between subgroups based on number of warts, number of recurrences, or number of sites involved) were assessed. The Chinese CECA10 had good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.98, P < .001), internal consistency (Cronbach α values of 0.88, 0.84, and 0.83 for the total questionnaire, psychological dimension, and sexual dimension, respectively), content validity (I-CVI = 1 for all items), and criterion validity (r = -0.50, P < .001). Exploratory factor analysis extracted 2 factors with a cumulative contribution of 61.75%; the factor loading with each item was >0.4. Discriminant validity was not high. The mean CECA10 and EQ-VAS scores of 211 patients with CA (28.19 ± 7.16 years; 139 males) were 34.56 ± 19.01 and 64.64 ± 19.28, respectively. The Chinese CECA10 has good reliability and validity for evaluating the QOL of Chinese patients with CA. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5851741/ /pubmed/29489693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009917 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3700 Guo, Xinying Wu, Xinjuan Guo, Aimin Zhao, Yanwei Reliability and validity of the Chinese CECA10 questionnaire for Chinese patients with condyloma acuminata |
title | Reliability and validity of the Chinese CECA10 questionnaire for Chinese patients with condyloma acuminata |
title_full | Reliability and validity of the Chinese CECA10 questionnaire for Chinese patients with condyloma acuminata |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of the Chinese CECA10 questionnaire for Chinese patients with condyloma acuminata |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of the Chinese CECA10 questionnaire for Chinese patients with condyloma acuminata |
title_short | Reliability and validity of the Chinese CECA10 questionnaire for Chinese patients with condyloma acuminata |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the chinese ceca10 questionnaire for chinese patients with condyloma acuminata |
topic | 3700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guoxinying reliabilityandvalidityofthechinesececa10questionnaireforchinesepatientswithcondylomaacuminata AT wuxinjuan reliabilityandvalidityofthechinesececa10questionnaireforchinesepatientswithcondylomaacuminata AT guoaimin reliabilityandvalidityofthechinesececa10questionnaireforchinesepatientswithcondylomaacuminata AT zhaoyanwei reliabilityandvalidityofthechinesececa10questionnaireforchinesepatientswithcondylomaacuminata |