Cargando…

Extracranial vertebral artery dissection: Findings and advantages of ultrasonography

Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is not uncommon in the young adult population. Owing to the various clinical manifestations; the diagnosis of VAD mainly depends on imaging examinations. Ultrasound has found an increasingly wide utilization in the diagnosis of VAD because of the continuous improvem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Lijuan, Ran, Haitao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010067
_version_ 1783306449565253632
author Yang, Lijuan
Ran, Haitao
author_facet Yang, Lijuan
Ran, Haitao
author_sort Yang, Lijuan
collection PubMed
description Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is not uncommon in the young adult population. Owing to the various clinical manifestations; the diagnosis of VAD mainly depends on imaging examinations. Ultrasound has found an increasingly wide utilization in the diagnosis of VAD because of the continuous improvement in the resolution of ultrasonic instruments and accessibility. We retrospectively collected the data of patients with a US-proven extracranial vertebral artery dissection. In accordance with the sonographic findings, all patients were classified as having intramural hematoma, double-lumen dissection, and occlusion dissection. The patients’ age, sex, risk factors for cerebrovascular diseases, and sonographic characteristics were analyzed. A total of 37 cases of US-proven extracranial vertebral artery dissections were included in this study. Thirty patients presented with intramural hematoma dissection, 1 had double-lumen dissection and 6 had occlusion dissection. No dissecting aneurysm was found in any of the patients. Concerning a subsequent angiographic examination, 13 patients failed to undergo the examination for various reasons. The remaining 24 patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and computerized tomographic angiography (CTA), among whom 1 patient with intramural hematoma was underdiagnosed because the DSA result was interpreted as normal. One patient who underwent CTA had a contrast allergy. In the remaining patients, the results of other imaging examinations were consistent with the US results. Intramural hematoma dissection is the most common type of extracranial vertebral artery dissection. Over other angiographic examinations US has a big diagnostic advantage for its direct view, accuracy, and low cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5851752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58517522018-03-21 Extracranial vertebral artery dissection: Findings and advantages of ultrasonography Yang, Lijuan Ran, Haitao Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is not uncommon in the young adult population. Owing to the various clinical manifestations; the diagnosis of VAD mainly depends on imaging examinations. Ultrasound has found an increasingly wide utilization in the diagnosis of VAD because of the continuous improvement in the resolution of ultrasonic instruments and accessibility. We retrospectively collected the data of patients with a US-proven extracranial vertebral artery dissection. In accordance with the sonographic findings, all patients were classified as having intramural hematoma, double-lumen dissection, and occlusion dissection. The patients’ age, sex, risk factors for cerebrovascular diseases, and sonographic characteristics were analyzed. A total of 37 cases of US-proven extracranial vertebral artery dissections were included in this study. Thirty patients presented with intramural hematoma dissection, 1 had double-lumen dissection and 6 had occlusion dissection. No dissecting aneurysm was found in any of the patients. Concerning a subsequent angiographic examination, 13 patients failed to undergo the examination for various reasons. The remaining 24 patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and computerized tomographic angiography (CTA), among whom 1 patient with intramural hematoma was underdiagnosed because the DSA result was interpreted as normal. One patient who underwent CTA had a contrast allergy. In the remaining patients, the results of other imaging examinations were consistent with the US results. Intramural hematoma dissection is the most common type of extracranial vertebral artery dissection. Over other angiographic examinations US has a big diagnostic advantage for its direct view, accuracy, and low cost. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5851752/ /pubmed/29489668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010067 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5300
Yang, Lijuan
Ran, Haitao
Extracranial vertebral artery dissection: Findings and advantages of ultrasonography
title Extracranial vertebral artery dissection: Findings and advantages of ultrasonography
title_full Extracranial vertebral artery dissection: Findings and advantages of ultrasonography
title_fullStr Extracranial vertebral artery dissection: Findings and advantages of ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Extracranial vertebral artery dissection: Findings and advantages of ultrasonography
title_short Extracranial vertebral artery dissection: Findings and advantages of ultrasonography
title_sort extracranial vertebral artery dissection: findings and advantages of ultrasonography
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5851752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010067
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglijuan extracranialvertebralarterydissectionfindingsandadvantagesofultrasonography
AT ranhaitao extracranialvertebralarterydissectionfindingsandadvantagesofultrasonography