Cargando…

The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is considered standard of care for patients with 1–3 brain metastases (BM). Recent observational studies have shown equivalent OS in patients with 5+ BM compared to those with 2–4, suggesting SRS alone may be appropriate in these patients. We aim to review outcomes of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Routman, David M., Bian, Shelly X., Diao, Kevin, Liu, Jonathan L., Yu, Cheng, Ye, Jason, Zada, Gabriel, Chang, Eric L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1352
_version_ 1783306557955506176
author Routman, David M.
Bian, Shelly X.
Diao, Kevin
Liu, Jonathan L.
Yu, Cheng
Ye, Jason
Zada, Gabriel
Chang, Eric L.
author_facet Routman, David M.
Bian, Shelly X.
Diao, Kevin
Liu, Jonathan L.
Yu, Cheng
Ye, Jason
Zada, Gabriel
Chang, Eric L.
author_sort Routman, David M.
collection PubMed
description Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is considered standard of care for patients with 1–3 brain metastases (BM). Recent observational studies have shown equivalent OS in patients with 5+ BM compared to those with 2–4, suggesting SRS alone may be appropriate in these patients. We aim to review outcomes of patients treated with SRS with 2–4 versus 5+ BM. This analysis included consecutive patients from 1994 to 2015 treated with SRS. Of 1017 patients, we excluded patients with a single BM and patients without adequate survival data, resulting in 391 patients. All risk factors were entered into univariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model, and significant factors were entered into multivariate analysis (MVA). We additionally analyzed outcomes after excluding patients with prior surgery or whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Median follow‐up was 7.1 months. Median KPS was 90, mean age was 59, and most common histologies were melanoma and lung. Median tumor volume was 3.41 cc. Patients with 2–4 BM had a median OS of 8.1 months compared to 6.2 months for those with 5+ BM (P = 0.0136). On MVA, tumor volume, KPS, and histology remained significant for OS, whereas lesion number did not. Similar results were found when excluding patients with prior surgery or WBRT. Rather than lesion number, the strongest prognostic factors for patients undergoing SRS were tumor volume >10 cc, KPS, and histology. BM number may therefore not be the most important criterion for candidacy for SRS. Patients with 5 or more BM should be considered for SRS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5852368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58523682018-03-22 The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery Routman, David M. Bian, Shelly X. Diao, Kevin Liu, Jonathan L. Yu, Cheng Ye, Jason Zada, Gabriel Chang, Eric L. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is considered standard of care for patients with 1–3 brain metastases (BM). Recent observational studies have shown equivalent OS in patients with 5+ BM compared to those with 2–4, suggesting SRS alone may be appropriate in these patients. We aim to review outcomes of patients treated with SRS with 2–4 versus 5+ BM. This analysis included consecutive patients from 1994 to 2015 treated with SRS. Of 1017 patients, we excluded patients with a single BM and patients without adequate survival data, resulting in 391 patients. All risk factors were entered into univariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model, and significant factors were entered into multivariate analysis (MVA). We additionally analyzed outcomes after excluding patients with prior surgery or whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Median follow‐up was 7.1 months. Median KPS was 90, mean age was 59, and most common histologies were melanoma and lung. Median tumor volume was 3.41 cc. Patients with 2–4 BM had a median OS of 8.1 months compared to 6.2 months for those with 5+ BM (P = 0.0136). On MVA, tumor volume, KPS, and histology remained significant for OS, whereas lesion number did not. Similar results were found when excluding patients with prior surgery or WBRT. Rather than lesion number, the strongest prognostic factors for patients undergoing SRS were tumor volume >10 cc, KPS, and histology. BM number may therefore not be the most important criterion for candidacy for SRS. Patients with 5 or more BM should be considered for SRS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5852368/ /pubmed/29441722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1352 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Routman, David M.
Bian, Shelly X.
Diao, Kevin
Liu, Jonathan L.
Yu, Cheng
Ye, Jason
Zada, Gabriel
Chang, Eric L.
The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
title The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
title_full The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
title_fullStr The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
title_full_unstemmed The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
title_short The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
title_sort growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1352
work_keys_str_mv AT routmandavidm thegrowingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT bianshellyx thegrowingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT diaokevin thegrowingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT liujonathanl thegrowingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT yucheng thegrowingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT yejason thegrowingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT zadagabriel thegrowingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT changericl thegrowingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT routmandavidm growingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT bianshellyx growingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT diaokevin growingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT liujonathanl growingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT yucheng growingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT yejason growingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT zadagabriel growingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery
AT changericl growingimportanceoflesionvolumeasaprognosticfactorinpatientswithmultiplebrainmetastasestreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgery