Cargando…
Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Healthy Eating Index
The Chinese Healthy Eating Index (CHEI) is a measuring instrument of diet quality in accordance with the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese (DGC)-2016. The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the CHEI. Data from 12,473 adults from the China Health and Nutrition Survey...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10020114 |
_version_ | 1783306612257062912 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Ya-Qun Li, Fan Wu, Han Wang, Ying-Chuan Chen, Jing-Si He, Geng-Sheng Li, Shu-Guang Chen, Bo |
author_facet | Yuan, Ya-Qun Li, Fan Wu, Han Wang, Ying-Chuan Chen, Jing-Si He, Geng-Sheng Li, Shu-Guang Chen, Bo |
author_sort | Yuan, Ya-Qun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Chinese Healthy Eating Index (CHEI) is a measuring instrument of diet quality in accordance with the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese (DGC)-2016. The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the CHEI. Data from 12,473 adults from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS)-2011, including 3-day–24-h dietary recalls were used in this study. The CHEI was assessed by four exemplary menus developed by the DGC-2016, the general linear models, the independent t-test and the Mann–Whitney U-test, the Spearman’s correlation analysis, the principal components analysis (PCA), the Cronbach’s coefficient, and the Pearson correlation with nutrient intakes. A higher CHEI score was linked with lower exposure to known risk factors of Chinese diets. The CHEI scored nearly perfect for exemplary menus for adult men (99.8), adult women (99.7), and the healthy elderly (99.1), but not for young children (91.2). The CHEI was able to distinguish the difference in diet quality between smokers and non-smokers (P < 0.0001), people with higher and lower education levels (P < 0.0001), and people living in urban and rural areas (P < 0.0001). Low correlations with energy intake for the CHEI total and component scores (|r| < 0.34, P < 0.01) supported the index assessed diet quality independently of diet quantity. The PCA indicated that underlying multiple dimensions compose the CHEI, and Cronbach’s coefficient α was 0.22. Components of dairy, fruits and cooking oils had the greatest impact on the total score. People with a higher CHEI score had not only a higher absolute intake of nutrients (P < 0.001), but also a more nutrient-dense diet (P < 0.001). Our findings support the validity and reliability of the CHEI when using the 3-day–24-h recalls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5852690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58526902018-03-19 Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Healthy Eating Index Yuan, Ya-Qun Li, Fan Wu, Han Wang, Ying-Chuan Chen, Jing-Si He, Geng-Sheng Li, Shu-Guang Chen, Bo Nutrients Article The Chinese Healthy Eating Index (CHEI) is a measuring instrument of diet quality in accordance with the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese (DGC)-2016. The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the CHEI. Data from 12,473 adults from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS)-2011, including 3-day–24-h dietary recalls were used in this study. The CHEI was assessed by four exemplary menus developed by the DGC-2016, the general linear models, the independent t-test and the Mann–Whitney U-test, the Spearman’s correlation analysis, the principal components analysis (PCA), the Cronbach’s coefficient, and the Pearson correlation with nutrient intakes. A higher CHEI score was linked with lower exposure to known risk factors of Chinese diets. The CHEI scored nearly perfect for exemplary menus for adult men (99.8), adult women (99.7), and the healthy elderly (99.1), but not for young children (91.2). The CHEI was able to distinguish the difference in diet quality between smokers and non-smokers (P < 0.0001), people with higher and lower education levels (P < 0.0001), and people living in urban and rural areas (P < 0.0001). Low correlations with energy intake for the CHEI total and component scores (|r| < 0.34, P < 0.01) supported the index assessed diet quality independently of diet quantity. The PCA indicated that underlying multiple dimensions compose the CHEI, and Cronbach’s coefficient α was 0.22. Components of dairy, fruits and cooking oils had the greatest impact on the total score. People with a higher CHEI score had not only a higher absolute intake of nutrients (P < 0.001), but also a more nutrient-dense diet (P < 0.001). Our findings support the validity and reliability of the CHEI when using the 3-day–24-h recalls. MDPI 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5852690/ /pubmed/29364173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10020114 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yuan, Ya-Qun Li, Fan Wu, Han Wang, Ying-Chuan Chen, Jing-Si He, Geng-Sheng Li, Shu-Guang Chen, Bo Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Healthy Eating Index |
title | Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Healthy Eating Index |
title_full | Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Healthy Eating Index |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Healthy Eating Index |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Healthy Eating Index |
title_short | Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Healthy Eating Index |
title_sort | evaluation of the validity and reliability of the chinese healthy eating index |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10020114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanyaqun evaluationofthevalidityandreliabilityofthechinesehealthyeatingindex AT lifan evaluationofthevalidityandreliabilityofthechinesehealthyeatingindex AT wuhan evaluationofthevalidityandreliabilityofthechinesehealthyeatingindex AT wangyingchuan evaluationofthevalidityandreliabilityofthechinesehealthyeatingindex AT chenjingsi evaluationofthevalidityandreliabilityofthechinesehealthyeatingindex AT hegengsheng evaluationofthevalidityandreliabilityofthechinesehealthyeatingindex AT lishuguang evaluationofthevalidityandreliabilityofthechinesehealthyeatingindex AT chenbo evaluationofthevalidityandreliabilityofthechinesehealthyeatingindex |