Cargando…

Fiber Intake and Insulin Resistance in 6374 Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity

A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate the relationship between fiber intake and insulin resistance, indexed using HOMA (homeostatic model assessment), in a National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) sample of 6374 U.S. adults. Another purpose was to test the influence of covari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tucker, Larry A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29461482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10020237
_version_ 1783306640780427264
author Tucker, Larry A.
author_facet Tucker, Larry A.
author_sort Tucker, Larry A.
collection PubMed
description A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate the relationship between fiber intake and insulin resistance, indexed using HOMA (homeostatic model assessment), in a National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) sample of 6374 U.S. adults. Another purpose was to test the influence of covariates on the association. A third aim was to compare HOMA levels between two groups based on the recommended intake of 14 g of fiber per 1000 kilocalories (kcal). Fiber intake was measured using a 24-h recall. With demographic variables controlled, results showed that HOMA differed across High, Moderate, and Low fiber categories (F = 5.4, p = 0.0072). Adjusting for the demographic variables, the possible misreporting of energy intake, smoking, and physical activity strengthened the relationship (F = 8.0, p = 0.0009), which remained significant after adjusting for body fat (F = 7.0, p = 0.0019) and body mass index (BMI) (F = 4.9, p = 0.0108), with the other covariates. However, the fiber–HOMA relationship was eliminated after adjusting for waist circumference (F = 2.3, p = 0.1050). Dividing participants based on the recommended 14-g standard resulted in meaningful HOMA differences (F = 16.4, p = 0.0002), and the association was not eliminated after controlling for waist circumference. Apparently, adults with high fiber consumption have less insulin resistance than their counterparts. However, much of the association is due to differences in waist circumference, unless the recommended intake of fiber is attained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5852813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58528132018-03-19 Fiber Intake and Insulin Resistance in 6374 Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity Tucker, Larry A. Nutrients Article A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate the relationship between fiber intake and insulin resistance, indexed using HOMA (homeostatic model assessment), in a National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) sample of 6374 U.S. adults. Another purpose was to test the influence of covariates on the association. A third aim was to compare HOMA levels between two groups based on the recommended intake of 14 g of fiber per 1000 kilocalories (kcal). Fiber intake was measured using a 24-h recall. With demographic variables controlled, results showed that HOMA differed across High, Moderate, and Low fiber categories (F = 5.4, p = 0.0072). Adjusting for the demographic variables, the possible misreporting of energy intake, smoking, and physical activity strengthened the relationship (F = 8.0, p = 0.0009), which remained significant after adjusting for body fat (F = 7.0, p = 0.0019) and body mass index (BMI) (F = 4.9, p = 0.0108), with the other covariates. However, the fiber–HOMA relationship was eliminated after adjusting for waist circumference (F = 2.3, p = 0.1050). Dividing participants based on the recommended 14-g standard resulted in meaningful HOMA differences (F = 16.4, p = 0.0002), and the association was not eliminated after controlling for waist circumference. Apparently, adults with high fiber consumption have less insulin resistance than their counterparts. However, much of the association is due to differences in waist circumference, unless the recommended intake of fiber is attained. MDPI 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5852813/ /pubmed/29461482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10020237 Text en © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tucker, Larry A.
Fiber Intake and Insulin Resistance in 6374 Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title Fiber Intake and Insulin Resistance in 6374 Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_full Fiber Intake and Insulin Resistance in 6374 Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_fullStr Fiber Intake and Insulin Resistance in 6374 Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_full_unstemmed Fiber Intake and Insulin Resistance in 6374 Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_short Fiber Intake and Insulin Resistance in 6374 Adults: The Role of Abdominal Obesity
title_sort fiber intake and insulin resistance in 6374 adults: the role of abdominal obesity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29461482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10020237
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckerlarrya fiberintakeandinsulinresistancein6374adultstheroleofabdominalobesity