Cargando…
Increases in Heart Rate Variability Signal Improved Outcomes in Rapid Response Team Consultations: A Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) indicates dominance of the sympathetic system and a state of “physiologic stress.” We postulated that, in patients with critical illness, increases in HRV might signal successful resuscitation and improved prognosis. METHODS: We carried out a prospect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1590217 |
_version_ | 1783306661758238720 |
---|---|
author | Salahuddin, Nawal Shafquat, Azam Marashly, Qussay Zaza, Khaled Juan Sharshir, Moh'd Khurshid, Moazzum Ali, Zeeshan Malgapo, Melissa Jamil, Mouhamad Ghyath Shoukri, Mohamed Hijazi, Mohammed Al-Ghamdi, Bandar |
author_facet | Salahuddin, Nawal Shafquat, Azam Marashly, Qussay Zaza, Khaled Juan Sharshir, Moh'd Khurshid, Moazzum Ali, Zeeshan Malgapo, Melissa Jamil, Mouhamad Ghyath Shoukri, Mohamed Hijazi, Mohammed Al-Ghamdi, Bandar |
author_sort | Salahuddin, Nawal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) indicates dominance of the sympathetic system and a state of “physiologic stress.” We postulated that, in patients with critical illness, increases in HRV might signal successful resuscitation and improved prognosis. METHODS: We carried out a prospective observational study of HRV on all patients referred to the rapid response team (RRT) and correlated with serial vital signs, lactate clearance, ICU admission, and mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were studied. Significantly higher HRV was observed in patients who achieved physiological stability and did not need ICU admission: ASDNN 19 versus 34.5, p=0.032; rMSSD 13.5 versus 25, p=0.046; mean VLF 9.4 versus 17, p=0.021; mean LF 5.8 versus 12.4, p=0.018; and mean HF 4.7 versus 10.5, p=0.017. ROC curves confirmed the change in very low frequencies at 2 hours as a strong predictor for ICU admission with an AUC of 0.772 (95% CI 0.633, 0.911, p=0.001) and a cutoff value of −0.65 associated with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 61%. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced HRV, specifically VLF, appears closely related to greater severity of critical illness, identifies unsuccessful resuscitation, and can be used to identify consultations that need early ICU admission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5852903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58529032018-04-23 Increases in Heart Rate Variability Signal Improved Outcomes in Rapid Response Team Consultations: A Cohort Study Salahuddin, Nawal Shafquat, Azam Marashly, Qussay Zaza, Khaled Juan Sharshir, Moh'd Khurshid, Moazzum Ali, Zeeshan Malgapo, Melissa Jamil, Mouhamad Ghyath Shoukri, Mohamed Hijazi, Mohammed Al-Ghamdi, Bandar Cardiol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) indicates dominance of the sympathetic system and a state of “physiologic stress.” We postulated that, in patients with critical illness, increases in HRV might signal successful resuscitation and improved prognosis. METHODS: We carried out a prospective observational study of HRV on all patients referred to the rapid response team (RRT) and correlated with serial vital signs, lactate clearance, ICU admission, and mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were studied. Significantly higher HRV was observed in patients who achieved physiological stability and did not need ICU admission: ASDNN 19 versus 34.5, p=0.032; rMSSD 13.5 versus 25, p=0.046; mean VLF 9.4 versus 17, p=0.021; mean LF 5.8 versus 12.4, p=0.018; and mean HF 4.7 versus 10.5, p=0.017. ROC curves confirmed the change in very low frequencies at 2 hours as a strong predictor for ICU admission with an AUC of 0.772 (95% CI 0.633, 0.911, p=0.001) and a cutoff value of −0.65 associated with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 61%. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced HRV, specifically VLF, appears closely related to greater severity of critical illness, identifies unsuccessful resuscitation, and can be used to identify consultations that need early ICU admission. Hindawi 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5852903/ /pubmed/29686889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1590217 Text en Copyright © 2018 Nawal Salahuddin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Salahuddin, Nawal Shafquat, Azam Marashly, Qussay Zaza, Khaled Juan Sharshir, Moh'd Khurshid, Moazzum Ali, Zeeshan Malgapo, Melissa Jamil, Mouhamad Ghyath Shoukri, Mohamed Hijazi, Mohammed Al-Ghamdi, Bandar Increases in Heart Rate Variability Signal Improved Outcomes in Rapid Response Team Consultations: A Cohort Study |
title | Increases in Heart Rate Variability Signal Improved Outcomes in Rapid Response Team Consultations: A Cohort Study |
title_full | Increases in Heart Rate Variability Signal Improved Outcomes in Rapid Response Team Consultations: A Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Increases in Heart Rate Variability Signal Improved Outcomes in Rapid Response Team Consultations: A Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Increases in Heart Rate Variability Signal Improved Outcomes in Rapid Response Team Consultations: A Cohort Study |
title_short | Increases in Heart Rate Variability Signal Improved Outcomes in Rapid Response Team Consultations: A Cohort Study |
title_sort | increases in heart rate variability signal improved outcomes in rapid response team consultations: a cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1590217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salahuddinnawal increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT shafquatazam increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT marashlyqussay increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT zazakhaledjuan increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT sharshirmohd increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT khurshidmoazzum increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT alizeeshan increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT malgapomelissa increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT jamilmouhamadghyath increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT shoukrimohamed increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT hijazimohammed increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy AT alghamdibandar increasesinheartratevariabilitysignalimprovedoutcomesinrapidresponseteamconsultationsacohortstudy |