Cargando…

Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population

BACKGROUND: Biochemical laboratory investigations help plan optimum management and communication in short- as well as long-term outcome to trauma victims. OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of real-time values of biochemical laboratory investigations of different trauma patients and their association w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhandarkar, Prashant, Pal, Ranabir, Munivenkatappa, Ashok, Roy, Nobhojit, Kumar, Vineet, Agrawal, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628663
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_70_17
_version_ 1783306663145504768
author Bhandarkar, Prashant
Pal, Ranabir
Munivenkatappa, Ashok
Roy, Nobhojit
Kumar, Vineet
Agrawal, Amit
author_facet Bhandarkar, Prashant
Pal, Ranabir
Munivenkatappa, Ashok
Roy, Nobhojit
Kumar, Vineet
Agrawal, Amit
author_sort Bhandarkar, Prashant
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biochemical laboratory investigations help plan optimum management and communication in short- as well as long-term outcome to trauma victims. OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of real-time values of biochemical laboratory investigations of different trauma patients and their association with overall mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data based on prospective, observational registry of “Towards Improved Trauma Care Outcomes” (TITCO) from four Indian city hospitals. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, random blood sugar, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatinine of patients on admission were recorded. Logistic regression was applied with all biochemical investigation as independent variable and overall mortality as dependent variable. RESULTS: Among 17047 trauma patients, 3456 with available laboratory result details were considered for this study. Overall mortality was 20% (range 14%–21%). For the higher laboratory results, value mortality was 21%–70%, with highest death (70%) for higher hemoglobin patients, followed by hematocrit (44%) and then creatinine (43%). Odds of high hemoglobin compared to normal were 15.20; odds of higher and lower of normal creatinine were 3.80 and 1.65 and for BUN were 2.17 and 1.92, respectively. Gender-wise significant difference was in overall female mortality (29%)% compared males (18%). Similar differences were replicated with results of each laboratory tests. CONCLUSION: The study ascertained the composite additional explanatory values of laboratory parameters in predicting outcome among injured patients in our population from Indian settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5852909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58529092018-04-06 Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population Bhandarkar, Prashant Pal, Ranabir Munivenkatappa, Ashok Roy, Nobhojit Kumar, Vineet Agrawal, Amit J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article BACKGROUND: Biochemical laboratory investigations help plan optimum management and communication in short- as well as long-term outcome to trauma victims. OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of real-time values of biochemical laboratory investigations of different trauma patients and their association with overall mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data based on prospective, observational registry of “Towards Improved Trauma Care Outcomes” (TITCO) from four Indian city hospitals. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, random blood sugar, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatinine of patients on admission were recorded. Logistic regression was applied with all biochemical investigation as independent variable and overall mortality as dependent variable. RESULTS: Among 17047 trauma patients, 3456 with available laboratory result details were considered for this study. Overall mortality was 20% (range 14%–21%). For the higher laboratory results, value mortality was 21%–70%, with highest death (70%) for higher hemoglobin patients, followed by hematocrit (44%) and then creatinine (43%). Odds of high hemoglobin compared to normal were 15.20; odds of higher and lower of normal creatinine were 3.80 and 1.65 and for BUN were 2.17 and 1.92, respectively. Gender-wise significant difference was in overall female mortality (29%)% compared males (18%). Similar differences were replicated with results of each laboratory tests. CONCLUSION: The study ascertained the composite additional explanatory values of laboratory parameters in predicting outcome among injured patients in our population from Indian settings. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5852909/ /pubmed/29628663 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_70_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bhandarkar, Prashant
Pal, Ranabir
Munivenkatappa, Ashok
Roy, Nobhojit
Kumar, Vineet
Agrawal, Amit
Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population
title Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population
title_full Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population
title_fullStr Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population
title_short Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population
title_sort distribution of laboratory parameters in trauma population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628663
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_70_17
work_keys_str_mv AT bhandarkarprashant distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation
AT palranabir distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation
AT munivenkatappaashok distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation
AT roynobhojit distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation
AT kumarvineet distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation
AT agrawalamit distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation