Cargando…
Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population
BACKGROUND: Biochemical laboratory investigations help plan optimum management and communication in short- as well as long-term outcome to trauma victims. OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of real-time values of biochemical laboratory investigations of different trauma patients and their association w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628663 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_70_17 |
_version_ | 1783306663145504768 |
---|---|
author | Bhandarkar, Prashant Pal, Ranabir Munivenkatappa, Ashok Roy, Nobhojit Kumar, Vineet Agrawal, Amit |
author_facet | Bhandarkar, Prashant Pal, Ranabir Munivenkatappa, Ashok Roy, Nobhojit Kumar, Vineet Agrawal, Amit |
author_sort | Bhandarkar, Prashant |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biochemical laboratory investigations help plan optimum management and communication in short- as well as long-term outcome to trauma victims. OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of real-time values of biochemical laboratory investigations of different trauma patients and their association with overall mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data based on prospective, observational registry of “Towards Improved Trauma Care Outcomes” (TITCO) from four Indian city hospitals. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, random blood sugar, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatinine of patients on admission were recorded. Logistic regression was applied with all biochemical investigation as independent variable and overall mortality as dependent variable. RESULTS: Among 17047 trauma patients, 3456 with available laboratory result details were considered for this study. Overall mortality was 20% (range 14%–21%). For the higher laboratory results, value mortality was 21%–70%, with highest death (70%) for higher hemoglobin patients, followed by hematocrit (44%) and then creatinine (43%). Odds of high hemoglobin compared to normal were 15.20; odds of higher and lower of normal creatinine were 3.80 and 1.65 and for BUN were 2.17 and 1.92, respectively. Gender-wise significant difference was in overall female mortality (29%)% compared males (18%). Similar differences were replicated with results of each laboratory tests. CONCLUSION: The study ascertained the composite additional explanatory values of laboratory parameters in predicting outcome among injured patients in our population from Indian settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5852909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58529092018-04-06 Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population Bhandarkar, Prashant Pal, Ranabir Munivenkatappa, Ashok Roy, Nobhojit Kumar, Vineet Agrawal, Amit J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article BACKGROUND: Biochemical laboratory investigations help plan optimum management and communication in short- as well as long-term outcome to trauma victims. OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of real-time values of biochemical laboratory investigations of different trauma patients and their association with overall mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data based on prospective, observational registry of “Towards Improved Trauma Care Outcomes” (TITCO) from four Indian city hospitals. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, random blood sugar, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatinine of patients on admission were recorded. Logistic regression was applied with all biochemical investigation as independent variable and overall mortality as dependent variable. RESULTS: Among 17047 trauma patients, 3456 with available laboratory result details were considered for this study. Overall mortality was 20% (range 14%–21%). For the higher laboratory results, value mortality was 21%–70%, with highest death (70%) for higher hemoglobin patients, followed by hematocrit (44%) and then creatinine (43%). Odds of high hemoglobin compared to normal were 15.20; odds of higher and lower of normal creatinine were 3.80 and 1.65 and for BUN were 2.17 and 1.92, respectively. Gender-wise significant difference was in overall female mortality (29%)% compared males (18%). Similar differences were replicated with results of each laboratory tests. CONCLUSION: The study ascertained the composite additional explanatory values of laboratory parameters in predicting outcome among injured patients in our population from Indian settings. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5852909/ /pubmed/29628663 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_70_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bhandarkar, Prashant Pal, Ranabir Munivenkatappa, Ashok Roy, Nobhojit Kumar, Vineet Agrawal, Amit Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population |
title | Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population |
title_full | Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population |
title_fullStr | Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population |
title_short | Distribution of Laboratory Parameters in Trauma Population |
title_sort | distribution of laboratory parameters in trauma population |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628663 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_70_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhandarkarprashant distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation AT palranabir distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation AT munivenkatappaashok distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation AT roynobhojit distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation AT kumarvineet distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation AT agrawalamit distributionoflaboratoryparametersintraumapopulation |