Cargando…

Effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin

CONTEXT: Eroded dentin might present the opening of dentinal tubules, increasing permeability, and consequently dentinal hypersensitivity. AIMS: This study evaluated the permeability of dentin surfaces exposed to different levels of erosion and methods of surface protection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Vivian Leite, da Costa Ramos, Rodrigo Vitoria, Pimenta Lima, Max José, Correia de Araújo, Roberto Paulo, Cavalcanti, Andrea Nóbrega
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628641
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_281_16
_version_ 1783306667591467008
author Martins, Vivian Leite
da Costa Ramos, Rodrigo Vitoria
Pimenta Lima, Max José
Correia de Araújo, Roberto Paulo
Cavalcanti, Andrea Nóbrega
author_facet Martins, Vivian Leite
da Costa Ramos, Rodrigo Vitoria
Pimenta Lima, Max José
Correia de Araújo, Roberto Paulo
Cavalcanti, Andrea Nóbrega
author_sort Martins, Vivian Leite
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Eroded dentin might present the opening of dentinal tubules, increasing permeability, and consequently dentinal hypersensitivity. AIMS: This study evaluated the permeability of dentin surfaces exposed to different levels of erosion and methods of surface protection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dentine samples (3 mm × 3 mm × 1 mm) were prepared from bovine incisors (n = 90) and divided into three groups according to the method of controlling erosive challenge: Negative control, topical fluoride application, and glass ionomer sealant. Subsequently, they were randomly divided into three subgroups according to the exposure of simulated gastric acid solution (Demineralization – DES) (5% HCl, pH = 2.2), and remineralization (RE); negative control, 9 and 18 cycles DES-RE. The dentin permeability was measured by assessing the hydraulic conductance (μl/min.cmH(2)O.cm(2)). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Greater permeability was observed after 18 erosive cycles, followed by exposure to 9 cycles and negative control (P < 0.0001). The application of glass ionomer sealant resulted in a major reduction of the hydraulic conductivity, regardless of the erosive challenge. Control groups and topical fluoride application showed similar results. In conclusion, the severity of erosive challenge contributed to the increase of dentin permeability. Besides, the glass ionomer sealant was the only protection agent that promoted significant effects in dentin permeability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5852928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58529282018-04-06 Effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin Martins, Vivian Leite da Costa Ramos, Rodrigo Vitoria Pimenta Lima, Max José Correia de Araújo, Roberto Paulo Cavalcanti, Andrea Nóbrega J Conserv Dent Original Article CONTEXT: Eroded dentin might present the opening of dentinal tubules, increasing permeability, and consequently dentinal hypersensitivity. AIMS: This study evaluated the permeability of dentin surfaces exposed to different levels of erosion and methods of surface protection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dentine samples (3 mm × 3 mm × 1 mm) were prepared from bovine incisors (n = 90) and divided into three groups according to the method of controlling erosive challenge: Negative control, topical fluoride application, and glass ionomer sealant. Subsequently, they were randomly divided into three subgroups according to the exposure of simulated gastric acid solution (Demineralization – DES) (5% HCl, pH = 2.2), and remineralization (RE); negative control, 9 and 18 cycles DES-RE. The dentin permeability was measured by assessing the hydraulic conductance (μl/min.cmH(2)O.cm(2)). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Greater permeability was observed after 18 erosive cycles, followed by exposure to 9 cycles and negative control (P < 0.0001). The application of glass ionomer sealant resulted in a major reduction of the hydraulic conductivity, regardless of the erosive challenge. Control groups and topical fluoride application showed similar results. In conclusion, the severity of erosive challenge contributed to the increase of dentin permeability. Besides, the glass ionomer sealant was the only protection agent that promoted significant effects in dentin permeability. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5852928/ /pubmed/29628641 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_281_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Martins, Vivian Leite
da Costa Ramos, Rodrigo Vitoria
Pimenta Lima, Max José
Correia de Araújo, Roberto Paulo
Cavalcanti, Andrea Nóbrega
Effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin
title Effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin
title_full Effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin
title_fullStr Effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin
title_full_unstemmed Effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin
title_short Effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin
title_sort effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628641
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_281_16
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsvivianleite effectofsurfaceprotectiononthepermeabilityoferodeddentin
AT dacostaramosrodrigovitoria effectofsurfaceprotectiononthepermeabilityoferodeddentin
AT pimentalimamaxjose effectofsurfaceprotectiononthepermeabilityoferodeddentin
AT correiadearaujorobertopaulo effectofsurfaceprotectiononthepermeabilityoferodeddentin
AT cavalcantiandreanobrega effectofsurfaceprotectiononthepermeabilityoferodeddentin