Cargando…
Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study
AIM: The study evaluated the antibacterial effects of dental restorations such as nano-hybrid composite (Empress), a glass ionomer cement (GIC Gold label Type 9) and silver amalgam against Streptococcus mutans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified bacterial suspension within the material assay was used...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628646 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_2_17 |
_version_ | 1783306668989218816 |
---|---|
author | Hegde, Nishmitha N. Attavar, Shruthi H. Hegde, Mithra N. Priya, G. |
author_facet | Hegde, Nishmitha N. Attavar, Shruthi H. Hegde, Mithra N. Priya, G. |
author_sort | Hegde, Nishmitha N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The study evaluated the antibacterial effects of dental restorations such as nano-hybrid composite (Empress), a glass ionomer cement (GIC Gold label Type 9) and silver amalgam against Streptococcus mutans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified bacterial suspension within the material assay was used to study the antibacterial effects. A volume of 20 μl of bacterial suspensions were placed in a narrow conical cavity within the materials. They were incubated for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h at 37°C. After the incubation period, the number of viable cells in the suspension was evaluated. In liquid culture assay, growth inhibition was measured at A600 nm up to 6 h in bacterial suspensions treated with the eluates of the restorative materials. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney's test were performed to determine the significant differences between the control and restorative materials for given incubation periods at 5% level of significance (P < 0.05) RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After 6 h of incubation, all restorative materials showed an inhibitory effect when compared to the controls. Silver amalgam showed the highest inhibition, followed by GIC Type 9 and composite. Silver amalgam showed marked inhibition after 2 h in comparison to the other material groups. These techniques employed to study the antibacterial effects showed that the silver amalgam had the pronounced inhibitory effect followed by GIC and composite. Further research on these aspects is necessary to determine whether the material can prevent secondary caries formation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5852934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58529342018-04-06 Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study Hegde, Nishmitha N. Attavar, Shruthi H. Hegde, Mithra N. Priya, G. J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The study evaluated the antibacterial effects of dental restorations such as nano-hybrid composite (Empress), a glass ionomer cement (GIC Gold label Type 9) and silver amalgam against Streptococcus mutans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified bacterial suspension within the material assay was used to study the antibacterial effects. A volume of 20 μl of bacterial suspensions were placed in a narrow conical cavity within the materials. They were incubated for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h at 37°C. After the incubation period, the number of viable cells in the suspension was evaluated. In liquid culture assay, growth inhibition was measured at A600 nm up to 6 h in bacterial suspensions treated with the eluates of the restorative materials. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney's test were performed to determine the significant differences between the control and restorative materials for given incubation periods at 5% level of significance (P < 0.05) RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After 6 h of incubation, all restorative materials showed an inhibitory effect when compared to the controls. Silver amalgam showed the highest inhibition, followed by GIC Type 9 and composite. Silver amalgam showed marked inhibition after 2 h in comparison to the other material groups. These techniques employed to study the antibacterial effects showed that the silver amalgam had the pronounced inhibitory effect followed by GIC and composite. Further research on these aspects is necessary to determine whether the material can prevent secondary caries formation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5852934/ /pubmed/29628646 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_2_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hegde, Nishmitha N. Attavar, Shruthi H. Hegde, Mithra N. Priya, G. Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study |
title | Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study |
title_full | Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study |
title_short | Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study |
title_sort | antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628646 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_2_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hegdenishmithan antibacterialactivityofdentalrestorativematerialaninvitrostudy AT attavarshruthih antibacterialactivityofdentalrestorativematerialaninvitrostudy AT hegdemithran antibacterialactivityofdentalrestorativematerialaninvitrostudy AT priyag antibacterialactivityofdentalrestorativematerialaninvitrostudy |