Cargando…
Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine
BACKGROUND: Most of surgical site infections (SSI) are caused by commensal and pathogenic agents from the patient’s microbiota, which may include antibiotic resistant strains. Pre-surgical asepsis of the skin is one of the preventive measures performed to reduce SSI incidence and also antibiotic res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1368-5 |
_version_ | 1783306674089492480 |
---|---|
author | Belo, Luís Serrano, Isa Cunha, Eva Carneiro, Carla Tavares, Luis Miguel Carreira, L. Oliveira, Manuela |
author_facet | Belo, Luís Serrano, Isa Cunha, Eva Carneiro, Carla Tavares, Luis Miguel Carreira, L. Oliveira, Manuela |
author_sort | Belo, Luís |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most of surgical site infections (SSI) are caused by commensal and pathogenic agents from the patient’s microbiota, which may include antibiotic resistant strains. Pre-surgical asepsis of the skin is one of the preventive measures performed to reduce SSI incidence and also antibiotic resistance dissemination. However, in veterinary medicine there is no agreement on which biocide is the most effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols in dogs. A total of 46 animals were randomly assigned for an asepsis protocol with an aqueous solution of 7.5% povidone-iodine or with an alcoholic solution of 2% chlorhexidine. For each dog, two skin swab samples were collected at pre-asepsis and post-asepsis, for bacterial quantification by conventional techniques and isolation of methicillin-resistant species. RESULTS: Most samples collected at the post-asepsis did not present bacterial growth, both for the animals subjected to the povidone-iodine (74%) or to the chlorhexidine (70%) protocols. In only 9% of the cases a significant bacterial logarithmic reduction was not observed, indicating possible resistance to these agents. Also, the logarithmic reduction of the bacterial quantification from pre- and post-asepsis time, was not statistically different for povidone-iodine (6.51 ± 1.94 log10) and chlorhexidine (6.46 ± 2.62 log10) protocol. From the 39% pre-asepsis swabs which showed bacterial growth in MRSA modified chromogenic agar medium, only one isolate was identified as Staphylococcus aureus and one as S. epidermidis. False positives were mainly other staphylococci species, as well as Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine showed similar efficacy in the elimination of methicillin resistant bacteria and preventing surgical site infections in dogs undergoing surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5852956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58529562018-03-21 Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine Belo, Luís Serrano, Isa Cunha, Eva Carneiro, Carla Tavares, Luis Miguel Carreira, L. Oliveira, Manuela BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Most of surgical site infections (SSI) are caused by commensal and pathogenic agents from the patient’s microbiota, which may include antibiotic resistant strains. Pre-surgical asepsis of the skin is one of the preventive measures performed to reduce SSI incidence and also antibiotic resistance dissemination. However, in veterinary medicine there is no agreement on which biocide is the most effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols in dogs. A total of 46 animals were randomly assigned for an asepsis protocol with an aqueous solution of 7.5% povidone-iodine or with an alcoholic solution of 2% chlorhexidine. For each dog, two skin swab samples were collected at pre-asepsis and post-asepsis, for bacterial quantification by conventional techniques and isolation of methicillin-resistant species. RESULTS: Most samples collected at the post-asepsis did not present bacterial growth, both for the animals subjected to the povidone-iodine (74%) or to the chlorhexidine (70%) protocols. In only 9% of the cases a significant bacterial logarithmic reduction was not observed, indicating possible resistance to these agents. Also, the logarithmic reduction of the bacterial quantification from pre- and post-asepsis time, was not statistically different for povidone-iodine (6.51 ± 1.94 log10) and chlorhexidine (6.46 ± 2.62 log10) protocol. From the 39% pre-asepsis swabs which showed bacterial growth in MRSA modified chromogenic agar medium, only one isolate was identified as Staphylococcus aureus and one as S. epidermidis. False positives were mainly other staphylococci species, as well as Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine showed similar efficacy in the elimination of methicillin resistant bacteria and preventing surgical site infections in dogs undergoing surgery. BioMed Central 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5852956/ /pubmed/29540169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1368-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Belo, Luís Serrano, Isa Cunha, Eva Carneiro, Carla Tavares, Luis Miguel Carreira, L. Oliveira, Manuela Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine |
title | Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine |
title_full | Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine |
title_fullStr | Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine |
title_full_unstemmed | Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine |
title_short | Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine |
title_sort | skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1368-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beloluis skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine AT serranoisa skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine AT cunhaeva skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine AT carneirocarla skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine AT tavaresluis skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine AT miguelcarreiral skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine AT oliveiramanuela skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine |