Cargando…

Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine

BACKGROUND: Most of surgical site infections (SSI) are caused by commensal and pathogenic agents from the patient’s microbiota, which may include antibiotic resistant strains. Pre-surgical asepsis of the skin is one of the preventive measures performed to reduce SSI incidence and also antibiotic res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belo, Luís, Serrano, Isa, Cunha, Eva, Carneiro, Carla, Tavares, Luis, Miguel Carreira, L., Oliveira, Manuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1368-5
_version_ 1783306674089492480
author Belo, Luís
Serrano, Isa
Cunha, Eva
Carneiro, Carla
Tavares, Luis
Miguel Carreira, L.
Oliveira, Manuela
author_facet Belo, Luís
Serrano, Isa
Cunha, Eva
Carneiro, Carla
Tavares, Luis
Miguel Carreira, L.
Oliveira, Manuela
author_sort Belo, Luís
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most of surgical site infections (SSI) are caused by commensal and pathogenic agents from the patient’s microbiota, which may include antibiotic resistant strains. Pre-surgical asepsis of the skin is one of the preventive measures performed to reduce SSI incidence and also antibiotic resistance dissemination. However, in veterinary medicine there is no agreement on which biocide is the most effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols in dogs. A total of 46 animals were randomly assigned for an asepsis protocol with an aqueous solution of 7.5% povidone-iodine or with an alcoholic solution of 2% chlorhexidine. For each dog, two skin swab samples were collected at pre-asepsis and post-asepsis, for bacterial quantification by conventional techniques and isolation of methicillin-resistant species. RESULTS: Most samples collected at the post-asepsis did not present bacterial growth, both for the animals subjected to the povidone-iodine (74%) or to the chlorhexidine (70%) protocols. In only 9% of the cases a significant bacterial logarithmic reduction was not observed, indicating possible resistance to these agents. Also, the logarithmic reduction of the bacterial quantification from pre- and post-asepsis time, was not statistically different for povidone-iodine (6.51 ± 1.94 log10) and chlorhexidine (6.46 ± 2.62 log10) protocol. From the 39% pre-asepsis swabs which showed bacterial growth in MRSA modified chromogenic agar medium, only one isolate was identified as Staphylococcus aureus and one as S. epidermidis. False positives were mainly other staphylococci species, as well as Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine showed similar efficacy in the elimination of methicillin resistant bacteria and preventing surgical site infections in dogs undergoing surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5852956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58529562018-03-21 Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine Belo, Luís Serrano, Isa Cunha, Eva Carneiro, Carla Tavares, Luis Miguel Carreira, L. Oliveira, Manuela BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Most of surgical site infections (SSI) are caused by commensal and pathogenic agents from the patient’s microbiota, which may include antibiotic resistant strains. Pre-surgical asepsis of the skin is one of the preventive measures performed to reduce SSI incidence and also antibiotic resistance dissemination. However, in veterinary medicine there is no agreement on which biocide is the most effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols in dogs. A total of 46 animals were randomly assigned for an asepsis protocol with an aqueous solution of 7.5% povidone-iodine or with an alcoholic solution of 2% chlorhexidine. For each dog, two skin swab samples were collected at pre-asepsis and post-asepsis, for bacterial quantification by conventional techniques and isolation of methicillin-resistant species. RESULTS: Most samples collected at the post-asepsis did not present bacterial growth, both for the animals subjected to the povidone-iodine (74%) or to the chlorhexidine (70%) protocols. In only 9% of the cases a significant bacterial logarithmic reduction was not observed, indicating possible resistance to these agents. Also, the logarithmic reduction of the bacterial quantification from pre- and post-asepsis time, was not statistically different for povidone-iodine (6.51 ± 1.94 log10) and chlorhexidine (6.46 ± 2.62 log10) protocol. From the 39% pre-asepsis swabs which showed bacterial growth in MRSA modified chromogenic agar medium, only one isolate was identified as Staphylococcus aureus and one as S. epidermidis. False positives were mainly other staphylococci species, as well as Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-surgical skin asepsis protocols with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine showed similar efficacy in the elimination of methicillin resistant bacteria and preventing surgical site infections in dogs undergoing surgery. BioMed Central 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5852956/ /pubmed/29540169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1368-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Belo, Luís
Serrano, Isa
Cunha, Eva
Carneiro, Carla
Tavares, Luis
Miguel Carreira, L.
Oliveira, Manuela
Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine
title Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine
title_full Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine
title_fullStr Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine
title_full_unstemmed Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine
title_short Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine
title_sort skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1368-5
work_keys_str_mv AT beloluis skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine
AT serranoisa skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine
AT cunhaeva skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine
AT carneirocarla skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine
AT tavaresluis skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine
AT miguelcarreiral skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine
AT oliveiramanuela skinasepsisprotocolsasapreventivemeasureofsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogschlorhexidinealcoholversuspovidoneiodine