Cargando…

A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study

OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to evaluate the efficiency in removal of smear layer of mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and chlorhexidine gluconate by scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation and also to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charlie, K. M., Kuttappa, M. A., George, Liza, Manoj, K. V., Joseph, Bobby, John, Nishin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629331
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_379_17
_version_ 1783306691445522432
author Charlie, K. M.
Kuttappa, M. A.
George, Liza
Manoj, K. V.
Joseph, Bobby
John, Nishin K.
author_facet Charlie, K. M.
Kuttappa, M. A.
George, Liza
Manoj, K. V.
Joseph, Bobby
John, Nishin K.
author_sort Charlie, K. M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to evaluate the efficiency in removal of smear layer of mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and chlorhexidine gluconate by scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation and also to evaluate the antimicrobial action of the same irrigants against standard culture strains of Enterococcus faecalis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 60 extracted permanent teeth with single root canal. The sample was categorized into five groups with 12 teeth in each group. Root canals were enlarged till size 40 with K-files. One group was kept as control and irrigated only with saline. Other four groups used 5% NaOCl as irrigant during instrumentation and MTAD, 5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate as final rinse. Teeth were split and examined under SEM. To test the antibacterial action, the zone of inhibition method using agar plates was used. Obtained data were statistically analyzed by SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: MTAD and 17% EDTA removed smear layer from all regions of the root canals. About 5% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate were ineffective in removing the smear layer. The mean zone of inhibition formed by the irrigants was in the following order; MTAD (40.5 mm), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (29.375 mm), 17% EDTA (24.125 mm), 5% NaOCl (22.125 mm), and saline (zero). CONCLUSION: MTAD showed high smear layer removal efficacy, but no significant difference was found to that of 17% EDTA. As the dimensions of the zones of inhibition showed, MTAD has got highest antibacterial action against E. faecalis, followed by 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 17% EDTA, and 5% NaOCl. However, the exact correlation of in vitro study results to clinical conditions is impossible due to the variables involved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5853045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58530452018-04-06 A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study Charlie, K. M. Kuttappa, M. A. George, Liza Manoj, K. V. Joseph, Bobby John, Nishin K. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to evaluate the efficiency in removal of smear layer of mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and chlorhexidine gluconate by scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation and also to evaluate the antimicrobial action of the same irrigants against standard culture strains of Enterococcus faecalis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 60 extracted permanent teeth with single root canal. The sample was categorized into five groups with 12 teeth in each group. Root canals were enlarged till size 40 with K-files. One group was kept as control and irrigated only with saline. Other four groups used 5% NaOCl as irrigant during instrumentation and MTAD, 5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate as final rinse. Teeth were split and examined under SEM. To test the antibacterial action, the zone of inhibition method using agar plates was used. Obtained data were statistically analyzed by SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: MTAD and 17% EDTA removed smear layer from all regions of the root canals. About 5% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate were ineffective in removing the smear layer. The mean zone of inhibition formed by the irrigants was in the following order; MTAD (40.5 mm), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (29.375 mm), 17% EDTA (24.125 mm), 5% NaOCl (22.125 mm), and saline (zero). CONCLUSION: MTAD showed high smear layer removal efficacy, but no significant difference was found to that of 17% EDTA. As the dimensions of the zones of inhibition showed, MTAD has got highest antibacterial action against E. faecalis, followed by 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 17% EDTA, and 5% NaOCl. However, the exact correlation of in vitro study results to clinical conditions is impossible due to the variables involved. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 2018-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5853045/ /pubmed/29629331 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_379_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Charlie, K. M.
Kuttappa, M. A.
George, Liza
Manoj, K. V.
Joseph, Bobby
John, Nishin K.
A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study
title A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study
title_full A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study
title_fullStr A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study
title_short A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study
title_sort scanning electron microscope evaluation of smear layer removal and antimicrobial action of mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent, sodium hypochlorite, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and chlorhexidine gluconate: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629331
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_379_17
work_keys_str_mv AT charliekm ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT kuttappama ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT georgeliza ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT manojkv ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT josephbobby ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT johnnishink ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT charliekm scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT kuttappama scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT georgeliza scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT manojkv scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT josephbobby scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy
AT johnnishink scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy