Cargando…
A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study
OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to evaluate the efficiency in removal of smear layer of mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and chlorhexidine gluconate by scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation and also to e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629331 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_379_17 |
_version_ | 1783306691445522432 |
---|---|
author | Charlie, K. M. Kuttappa, M. A. George, Liza Manoj, K. V. Joseph, Bobby John, Nishin K. |
author_facet | Charlie, K. M. Kuttappa, M. A. George, Liza Manoj, K. V. Joseph, Bobby John, Nishin K. |
author_sort | Charlie, K. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to evaluate the efficiency in removal of smear layer of mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and chlorhexidine gluconate by scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation and also to evaluate the antimicrobial action of the same irrigants against standard culture strains of Enterococcus faecalis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 60 extracted permanent teeth with single root canal. The sample was categorized into five groups with 12 teeth in each group. Root canals were enlarged till size 40 with K-files. One group was kept as control and irrigated only with saline. Other four groups used 5% NaOCl as irrigant during instrumentation and MTAD, 5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate as final rinse. Teeth were split and examined under SEM. To test the antibacterial action, the zone of inhibition method using agar plates was used. Obtained data were statistically analyzed by SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: MTAD and 17% EDTA removed smear layer from all regions of the root canals. About 5% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate were ineffective in removing the smear layer. The mean zone of inhibition formed by the irrigants was in the following order; MTAD (40.5 mm), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (29.375 mm), 17% EDTA (24.125 mm), 5% NaOCl (22.125 mm), and saline (zero). CONCLUSION: MTAD showed high smear layer removal efficacy, but no significant difference was found to that of 17% EDTA. As the dimensions of the zones of inhibition showed, MTAD has got highest antibacterial action against E. faecalis, followed by 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 17% EDTA, and 5% NaOCl. However, the exact correlation of in vitro study results to clinical conditions is impossible due to the variables involved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5853045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58530452018-04-06 A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study Charlie, K. M. Kuttappa, M. A. George, Liza Manoj, K. V. Joseph, Bobby John, Nishin K. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to evaluate the efficiency in removal of smear layer of mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and chlorhexidine gluconate by scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation and also to evaluate the antimicrobial action of the same irrigants against standard culture strains of Enterococcus faecalis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 60 extracted permanent teeth with single root canal. The sample was categorized into five groups with 12 teeth in each group. Root canals were enlarged till size 40 with K-files. One group was kept as control and irrigated only with saline. Other four groups used 5% NaOCl as irrigant during instrumentation and MTAD, 5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate as final rinse. Teeth were split and examined under SEM. To test the antibacterial action, the zone of inhibition method using agar plates was used. Obtained data were statistically analyzed by SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: MTAD and 17% EDTA removed smear layer from all regions of the root canals. About 5% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate were ineffective in removing the smear layer. The mean zone of inhibition formed by the irrigants was in the following order; MTAD (40.5 mm), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (29.375 mm), 17% EDTA (24.125 mm), 5% NaOCl (22.125 mm), and saline (zero). CONCLUSION: MTAD showed high smear layer removal efficacy, but no significant difference was found to that of 17% EDTA. As the dimensions of the zones of inhibition showed, MTAD has got highest antibacterial action against E. faecalis, followed by 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 17% EDTA, and 5% NaOCl. However, the exact correlation of in vitro study results to clinical conditions is impossible due to the variables involved. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 2018-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5853045/ /pubmed/29629331 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_379_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Charlie, K. M. Kuttappa, M. A. George, Liza Manoj, K. V. Joseph, Bobby John, Nishin K. A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study |
title | A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study |
title_full | A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study |
title_fullStr | A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study |
title_short | A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study |
title_sort | scanning electron microscope evaluation of smear layer removal and antimicrobial action of mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent, sodium hypochlorite, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and chlorhexidine gluconate: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629331 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_379_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT charliekm ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT kuttappama ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT georgeliza ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT manojkv ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT josephbobby ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT johnnishink ascanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT charliekm scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT kuttappama scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT georgeliza scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT manojkv scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT josephbobby scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy AT johnnishink scanningelectronmicroscopeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalandantimicrobialactionofmixtureoftetracyclineacidanddetergentsodiumhypochloriteethylenediaminetetraaceticacidandchlorhexidinegluconateaninvitrostudy |