Cargando…
Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment
The flower is a bisexual reproductive unit where both genders compete for resources. Counting pollen and ovules in flowers is essential to understand how much is invested in each gender. Classical methods to count very numerous pollen grains and ovules are inefficient when pollen grains are tightly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29294036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx405 |
_version_ | 1783306736164143104 |
---|---|
author | Staedler, Y M Kreisberger, T Manafzadeh, S Chartier, M Handschuh, S Pamperl, S Sontag, S Paun, O Schönenberger, J |
author_facet | Staedler, Y M Kreisberger, T Manafzadeh, S Chartier, M Handschuh, S Pamperl, S Sontag, S Paun, O Schönenberger, J |
author_sort | Staedler, Y M |
collection | PubMed |
description | The flower is a bisexual reproductive unit where both genders compete for resources. Counting pollen and ovules in flowers is essential to understand how much is invested in each gender. Classical methods to count very numerous pollen grains and ovules are inefficient when pollen grains are tightly aggregated, and when fertilization rates of ovules are unknown. In this study we have therefore developed novel counting techniques based on computed tomography. In order to demonstrate the potential of our methods in very difficult cases, we counted pollen and ovules across inflorescences of deceptive and rewarding species of European orchids, which possess both very large numbers of pollen grains (tightly aggregated) and ovules. Pollen counts did not significantly vary across inflorescences and pollination strategies, whereas deceptive flowers had significantly more ovules than rewarding flowers. The within-inflorescence variance of pollen-to-ovule ratios in rewarding flowers was four times higher than in deceptive flowers, possibly demonstrating differences in the constraints acting on both pollination strategies. We demonstrate the inaccuracies and limitations of previously established methods, and the broad applicability of our new techniques: they allow measurement of reproductive investment without restriction on object number or aggregation, and without specimen destruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5853293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58532932018-07-12 Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment Staedler, Y M Kreisberger, T Manafzadeh, S Chartier, M Handschuh, S Pamperl, S Sontag, S Paun, O Schönenberger, J J Exp Bot Research Papers The flower is a bisexual reproductive unit where both genders compete for resources. Counting pollen and ovules in flowers is essential to understand how much is invested in each gender. Classical methods to count very numerous pollen grains and ovules are inefficient when pollen grains are tightly aggregated, and when fertilization rates of ovules are unknown. In this study we have therefore developed novel counting techniques based on computed tomography. In order to demonstrate the potential of our methods in very difficult cases, we counted pollen and ovules across inflorescences of deceptive and rewarding species of European orchids, which possess both very large numbers of pollen grains (tightly aggregated) and ovules. Pollen counts did not significantly vary across inflorescences and pollination strategies, whereas deceptive flowers had significantly more ovules than rewarding flowers. The within-inflorescence variance of pollen-to-ovule ratios in rewarding flowers was four times higher than in deceptive flowers, possibly demonstrating differences in the constraints acting on both pollination strategies. We demonstrate the inaccuracies and limitations of previously established methods, and the broad applicability of our new techniques: they allow measurement of reproductive investment without restriction on object number or aggregation, and without specimen destruction. Oxford University Press 2018-01-23 2017-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5853293/ /pubmed/29294036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx405 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Staedler, Y M Kreisberger, T Manafzadeh, S Chartier, M Handschuh, S Pamperl, S Sontag, S Paun, O Schönenberger, J Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment |
title | Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment |
title_full | Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment |
title_fullStr | Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment |
title_short | Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment |
title_sort | novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29294036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staedlerym novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment AT kreisbergert novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment AT manafzadehs novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment AT chartierm novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment AT handschuhs novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment AT pamperls novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment AT sontags novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment AT pauno novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment AT schonenbergerj novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment |