Cargando…

Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment

The flower is a bisexual reproductive unit where both genders compete for resources. Counting pollen and ovules in flowers is essential to understand how much is invested in each gender. Classical methods to count very numerous pollen grains and ovules are inefficient when pollen grains are tightly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staedler, Y M, Kreisberger, T, Manafzadeh, S, Chartier, M, Handschuh, S, Pamperl, S, Sontag, S, Paun, O, Schönenberger, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29294036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx405
_version_ 1783306736164143104
author Staedler, Y M
Kreisberger, T
Manafzadeh, S
Chartier, M
Handschuh, S
Pamperl, S
Sontag, S
Paun, O
Schönenberger, J
author_facet Staedler, Y M
Kreisberger, T
Manafzadeh, S
Chartier, M
Handschuh, S
Pamperl, S
Sontag, S
Paun, O
Schönenberger, J
author_sort Staedler, Y M
collection PubMed
description The flower is a bisexual reproductive unit where both genders compete for resources. Counting pollen and ovules in flowers is essential to understand how much is invested in each gender. Classical methods to count very numerous pollen grains and ovules are inefficient when pollen grains are tightly aggregated, and when fertilization rates of ovules are unknown. In this study we have therefore developed novel counting techniques based on computed tomography. In order to demonstrate the potential of our methods in very difficult cases, we counted pollen and ovules across inflorescences of deceptive and rewarding species of European orchids, which possess both very large numbers of pollen grains (tightly aggregated) and ovules. Pollen counts did not significantly vary across inflorescences and pollination strategies, whereas deceptive flowers had significantly more ovules than rewarding flowers. The within-inflorescence variance of pollen-to-ovule ratios in rewarding flowers was four times higher than in deceptive flowers, possibly demonstrating differences in the constraints acting on both pollination strategies. We demonstrate the inaccuracies and limitations of previously established methods, and the broad applicability of our new techniques: they allow measurement of reproductive investment without restriction on object number or aggregation, and without specimen destruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5853293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58532932018-07-12 Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment Staedler, Y M Kreisberger, T Manafzadeh, S Chartier, M Handschuh, S Pamperl, S Sontag, S Paun, O Schönenberger, J J Exp Bot Research Papers The flower is a bisexual reproductive unit where both genders compete for resources. Counting pollen and ovules in flowers is essential to understand how much is invested in each gender. Classical methods to count very numerous pollen grains and ovules are inefficient when pollen grains are tightly aggregated, and when fertilization rates of ovules are unknown. In this study we have therefore developed novel counting techniques based on computed tomography. In order to demonstrate the potential of our methods in very difficult cases, we counted pollen and ovules across inflorescences of deceptive and rewarding species of European orchids, which possess both very large numbers of pollen grains (tightly aggregated) and ovules. Pollen counts did not significantly vary across inflorescences and pollination strategies, whereas deceptive flowers had significantly more ovules than rewarding flowers. The within-inflorescence variance of pollen-to-ovule ratios in rewarding flowers was four times higher than in deceptive flowers, possibly demonstrating differences in the constraints acting on both pollination strategies. We demonstrate the inaccuracies and limitations of previously established methods, and the broad applicability of our new techniques: they allow measurement of reproductive investment without restriction on object number or aggregation, and without specimen destruction. Oxford University Press 2018-01-23 2017-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5853293/ /pubmed/29294036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx405 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Staedler, Y M
Kreisberger, T
Manafzadeh, S
Chartier, M
Handschuh, S
Pamperl, S
Sontag, S
Paun, O
Schönenberger, J
Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment
title Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment
title_full Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment
title_fullStr Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment
title_full_unstemmed Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment
title_short Novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment
title_sort novel computed tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29294036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx405
work_keys_str_mv AT staedlerym novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment
AT kreisbergert novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment
AT manafzadehs novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment
AT chartierm novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment
AT handschuhs novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment
AT pamperls novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment
AT sontags novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment
AT pauno novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment
AT schonenbergerj novelcomputedtomographybasedtoolsreliablyquantifyplantreproductiveinvestment