Cargando…

Both activated and less‐activated regions identified by functional MRI reconfigure to support task executions

INTRODUCTION: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become very important for noninvasively characterizing BOLD signal fluctuations, which reflect the changes in neuronal firings in the brain. Unlike the activation detection strategy utilized with fMRI, which only emphasizes the synchroni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zuo, Nianming, Yang, Zhengyi, Liu, Yong, Li, Jin, Jiang, Tianzi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29568689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.893
_version_ 1783306784721600512
author Zuo, Nianming
Yang, Zhengyi
Liu, Yong
Li, Jin
Jiang, Tianzi
author_facet Zuo, Nianming
Yang, Zhengyi
Liu, Yong
Li, Jin
Jiang, Tianzi
author_sort Zuo, Nianming
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become very important for noninvasively characterizing BOLD signal fluctuations, which reflect the changes in neuronal firings in the brain. Unlike the activation detection strategy utilized with fMRI, which only emphasizes the synchronicity between the functional nodes (activated regions) and the task design, brain connectivity and network theory are able to decipher the interactive structure across the entire brain. However, little is known about whether and how the activated/less‐activated interactions are associated with the functional changes that occur when the brain changes from the resting state to a task state. What are the key networks that play important roles in the brain state changes? METHODS: We used the fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project S500 release to examine the changes of network efficiency, interaction strength, and fractional modularity contributions of both the local and global networks, when the subjects change from the resting state to seven different task states. RESULTS: We found that, from the resting state to each of seven task states, both the activated and less‐activated regions had significantly changed to be in line with, and comparably contributed to, a global network reconfiguration. We also found that three networks, the default mode network, frontoparietal network, and salience network, dominated the flexible reconfiguration of the brain. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows quantitatively that contributions from both activated and less‐activated regions enable the global functional network to respond when the brain switches from the resting state to a task state and suggests the necessity of considering large‐scale networks (rather than only activated regions) when investigating brain functions in imaging cognitive neuroscience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5853621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58536212018-03-22 Both activated and less‐activated regions identified by functional MRI reconfigure to support task executions Zuo, Nianming Yang, Zhengyi Liu, Yong Li, Jin Jiang, Tianzi Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become very important for noninvasively characterizing BOLD signal fluctuations, which reflect the changes in neuronal firings in the brain. Unlike the activation detection strategy utilized with fMRI, which only emphasizes the synchronicity between the functional nodes (activated regions) and the task design, brain connectivity and network theory are able to decipher the interactive structure across the entire brain. However, little is known about whether and how the activated/less‐activated interactions are associated with the functional changes that occur when the brain changes from the resting state to a task state. What are the key networks that play important roles in the brain state changes? METHODS: We used the fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project S500 release to examine the changes of network efficiency, interaction strength, and fractional modularity contributions of both the local and global networks, when the subjects change from the resting state to seven different task states. RESULTS: We found that, from the resting state to each of seven task states, both the activated and less‐activated regions had significantly changed to be in line with, and comparably contributed to, a global network reconfiguration. We also found that three networks, the default mode network, frontoparietal network, and salience network, dominated the flexible reconfiguration of the brain. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows quantitatively that contributions from both activated and less‐activated regions enable the global functional network to respond when the brain switches from the resting state to a task state and suggests the necessity of considering large‐scale networks (rather than only activated regions) when investigating brain functions in imaging cognitive neuroscience. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5853621/ /pubmed/29568689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.893 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zuo, Nianming
Yang, Zhengyi
Liu, Yong
Li, Jin
Jiang, Tianzi
Both activated and less‐activated regions identified by functional MRI reconfigure to support task executions
title Both activated and less‐activated regions identified by functional MRI reconfigure to support task executions
title_full Both activated and less‐activated regions identified by functional MRI reconfigure to support task executions
title_fullStr Both activated and less‐activated regions identified by functional MRI reconfigure to support task executions
title_full_unstemmed Both activated and less‐activated regions identified by functional MRI reconfigure to support task executions
title_short Both activated and less‐activated regions identified by functional MRI reconfigure to support task executions
title_sort both activated and less‐activated regions identified by functional mri reconfigure to support task executions
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29568689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.893
work_keys_str_mv AT zuonianming bothactivatedandlessactivatedregionsidentifiedbyfunctionalmrireconfiguretosupporttaskexecutions
AT yangzhengyi bothactivatedandlessactivatedregionsidentifiedbyfunctionalmrireconfiguretosupporttaskexecutions
AT liuyong bothactivatedandlessactivatedregionsidentifiedbyfunctionalmrireconfiguretosupporttaskexecutions
AT lijin bothactivatedandlessactivatedregionsidentifiedbyfunctionalmrireconfiguretosupporttaskexecutions
AT jiangtianzi bothactivatedandlessactivatedregionsidentifiedbyfunctionalmrireconfiguretosupporttaskexecutions