Cargando…

Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Anum Irfan, Arthurs, Erin, Gradin, Sharon, MacKinnon, Marnie, Sussman, Jonathan, Kukreti, Vishal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588638
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2543
_version_ 1783306845005283328
author Khan, Anum Irfan
Arthurs, Erin
Gradin, Sharon
MacKinnon, Marnie
Sussman, Jonathan
Kukreti, Vishal
author_facet Khan, Anum Irfan
Arthurs, Erin
Gradin, Sharon
MacKinnon, Marnie
Sussman, Jonathan
Kukreti, Vishal
author_sort Khan, Anum Irfan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. METHODS: Given limited consensus around what constitutes an integrated care plan for cancer patients, a scoping review was conducted to explore the components of integrated care plans and contextual factors that influence design and uptake. RESULTS: Five types of integrated care plans based on the stage of cancer care: surgical, systemic, survivorship, palliative and comprehensive (involving a transition between stages) are described in current literature. Breast, esophageal and colorectal cancers were common disease sites. Multi-disciplinary teams, patient needs assessment and transitional planning emerged as key features. Provider buy-in and training alongside informational technology support served as important facilitators for plan uptake. Provider-level measurement was considerably less robust compared to patient and system-level indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Similarities in design features, components and facilitators across the various types of integrated care plans indicates opportunities to leverage shared features and enable a management lens that spans the trajectory of a patient’s journey rather than a phase-specific silo approach to care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5853967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58539672018-03-27 Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review Khan, Anum Irfan Arthurs, Erin Gradin, Sharon MacKinnon, Marnie Sussman, Jonathan Kukreti, Vishal Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. METHODS: Given limited consensus around what constitutes an integrated care plan for cancer patients, a scoping review was conducted to explore the components of integrated care plans and contextual factors that influence design and uptake. RESULTS: Five types of integrated care plans based on the stage of cancer care: surgical, systemic, survivorship, palliative and comprehensive (involving a transition between stages) are described in current literature. Breast, esophageal and colorectal cancers were common disease sites. Multi-disciplinary teams, patient needs assessment and transitional planning emerged as key features. Provider buy-in and training alongside informational technology support served as important facilitators for plan uptake. Provider-level measurement was considerably less robust compared to patient and system-level indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Similarities in design features, components and facilitators across the various types of integrated care plans indicates opportunities to leverage shared features and enable a management lens that spans the trajectory of a patient’s journey rather than a phase-specific silo approach to care. Ubiquity Press 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5853967/ /pubmed/29588638 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2543 Text en Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Khan, Anum Irfan
Arthurs, Erin
Gradin, Sharon
MacKinnon, Marnie
Sussman, Jonathan
Kukreti, Vishal
Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_full Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_short Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_sort integrated care planning for cancer patients: a scoping review
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5853967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588638
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2543
work_keys_str_mv AT khananumirfan integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT arthurserin integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT gradinsharon integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT mackinnonmarnie integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT sussmanjonathan integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT kukretivishal integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview