Cargando…
Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccines—Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective
In 2015, the Global Commission for the Certification of Polio Eradication certified the eradication of type 2 wild poliovirus, 1 of 3 wild poliovirus serotypes causing paralytic polio since the beginning of recorded history. This milestone was one of the key criteria prompting the Global Polio Eradi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28838179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw626 |
_version_ | 1783306855849656320 |
---|---|
author | Ramirez Gonzalez, Alejandro Farrell, Margaret Menning, Lisa Garon, Julie Everts, Hans Hampton, Lee M. Dolan, Samantha B. Shendale, Stephanie Wanyoike, Sarah Veira, Chantal Laroche du Châtellier, Gaël Maufras Kurji, Feyrouz Rubin, Jennifer Boualam, Liliane Chang Blanc, Diana Patel, Manish |
author_facet | Ramirez Gonzalez, Alejandro Farrell, Margaret Menning, Lisa Garon, Julie Everts, Hans Hampton, Lee M. Dolan, Samantha B. Shendale, Stephanie Wanyoike, Sarah Veira, Chantal Laroche du Châtellier, Gaël Maufras Kurji, Feyrouz Rubin, Jennifer Boualam, Liliane Chang Blanc, Diana Patel, Manish |
author_sort | Ramirez Gonzalez, Alejandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2015, the Global Commission for the Certification of Polio Eradication certified the eradication of type 2 wild poliovirus, 1 of 3 wild poliovirus serotypes causing paralytic polio since the beginning of recorded history. This milestone was one of the key criteria prompting the Global Polio Eradication Initiative to begin withdrawal of oral polio vaccines (OPV), beginning with the type 2 component (OPV2), through a globally synchronized initiative in April and May 2016 that called for all OPV using countries and territories to simultaneously switch from use of trivalent OPV (tOPV; containing types 1, 2, and 3 poliovirus) to bivalent OPV (bOPV; containing types 1 and 3 poliovirus), thus withdrawing OPV2. Before the switch, immunization programs globally had been using approximately 2 billion tOPV doses per year to immunize hundreds of millions of children. Thus, the globally synchronized withdrawal of tOPV was an unprecedented achievement in immunization and was part of a crucial strategy for containment of polioviruses. Successful implementation of the switch called for intense global coordination during 2015–2016 on an unprecedented scale among global public health technical agencies and donors, vaccine manufacturers, regulatory agencies, World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) regional offices, and national governments. Priority activities included cessation of tOPV production and shipment, national inventories of tOPV, detailed forecasting of tOPV needs, bOPV licensing, scaling up of bOPV production and procurement, developing national operational switch plans, securing funding, establishing oversight and implementation committees and teams, training logisticians and health workers, fostering advocacy and communications, establishing monitoring and validation structures, and implementing waste management strategies. The WHO received confirmation that, by mid May 2016, all 155 countries and territories that had used OPV in 2015 had successfully withdrawn OPV2 by ceasing use of tOPV in their national immunization programs. This article provides an overview of the global efforts and challenges in successfully implementing this unprecedented global initiative, including (1) coordination and tracking of key global planning milestones, (2) guidance facilitating development of country specific plans, (3) challenges for planning and implementing the switch at the global level, and (4) best practices and lessons learned in meeting aggressive switch timelines. Lessons from this monumental public health achievement by countries and partners will likely be drawn upon when bOPV is withdrawn after polio eradication but also could be relevant for other global health initiatives with similarly complex mandates and accelerated timelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5854099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58540992018-07-01 Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccines—Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective Ramirez Gonzalez, Alejandro Farrell, Margaret Menning, Lisa Garon, Julie Everts, Hans Hampton, Lee M. Dolan, Samantha B. Shendale, Stephanie Wanyoike, Sarah Veira, Chantal Laroche du Châtellier, Gaël Maufras Kurji, Feyrouz Rubin, Jennifer Boualam, Liliane Chang Blanc, Diana Patel, Manish J Infect Dis Supplement Article In 2015, the Global Commission for the Certification of Polio Eradication certified the eradication of type 2 wild poliovirus, 1 of 3 wild poliovirus serotypes causing paralytic polio since the beginning of recorded history. This milestone was one of the key criteria prompting the Global Polio Eradication Initiative to begin withdrawal of oral polio vaccines (OPV), beginning with the type 2 component (OPV2), through a globally synchronized initiative in April and May 2016 that called for all OPV using countries and territories to simultaneously switch from use of trivalent OPV (tOPV; containing types 1, 2, and 3 poliovirus) to bivalent OPV (bOPV; containing types 1 and 3 poliovirus), thus withdrawing OPV2. Before the switch, immunization programs globally had been using approximately 2 billion tOPV doses per year to immunize hundreds of millions of children. Thus, the globally synchronized withdrawal of tOPV was an unprecedented achievement in immunization and was part of a crucial strategy for containment of polioviruses. Successful implementation of the switch called for intense global coordination during 2015–2016 on an unprecedented scale among global public health technical agencies and donors, vaccine manufacturers, regulatory agencies, World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) regional offices, and national governments. Priority activities included cessation of tOPV production and shipment, national inventories of tOPV, detailed forecasting of tOPV needs, bOPV licensing, scaling up of bOPV production and procurement, developing national operational switch plans, securing funding, establishing oversight and implementation committees and teams, training logisticians and health workers, fostering advocacy and communications, establishing monitoring and validation structures, and implementing waste management strategies. The WHO received confirmation that, by mid May 2016, all 155 countries and territories that had used OPV in 2015 had successfully withdrawn OPV2 by ceasing use of tOPV in their national immunization programs. This article provides an overview of the global efforts and challenges in successfully implementing this unprecedented global initiative, including (1) coordination and tracking of key global planning milestones, (2) guidance facilitating development of country specific plans, (3) challenges for planning and implementing the switch at the global level, and (4) best practices and lessons learned in meeting aggressive switch timelines. Lessons from this monumental public health achievement by countries and partners will likely be drawn upon when bOPV is withdrawn after polio eradication but also could be relevant for other global health initiatives with similarly complex mandates and accelerated timelines. Oxford University Press 2017-07-01 2017-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5854099/ /pubmed/28838179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw626 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO (CC BY 3.0 IGO) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/) which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Supplement Article Ramirez Gonzalez, Alejandro Farrell, Margaret Menning, Lisa Garon, Julie Everts, Hans Hampton, Lee M. Dolan, Samantha B. Shendale, Stephanie Wanyoike, Sarah Veira, Chantal Laroche du Châtellier, Gaël Maufras Kurji, Feyrouz Rubin, Jennifer Boualam, Liliane Chang Blanc, Diana Patel, Manish Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccines—Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective |
title | Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral
Polio Vaccines—Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective |
title_full | Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral
Polio Vaccines—Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective |
title_fullStr | Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral
Polio Vaccines—Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral
Polio Vaccines—Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective |
title_short | Implementing the Synchronized Global Switch from Trivalent to Bivalent Oral
Polio Vaccines—Lessons Learned From the Global Perspective |
title_sort | implementing the synchronized global switch from trivalent to bivalent oral
polio vaccines—lessons learned from the global perspective |
topic | Supplement Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28838179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramirezgonzalezalejandro implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT farrellmargaret implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT menninglisa implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT garonjulie implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT evertshans implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT hamptonleem implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT dolansamanthab implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT shendalestephanie implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT wanyoikesarah implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT veirachantallaroche implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT duchatelliergaelmaufras implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT kurjifeyrouz implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT rubinjennifer implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT boualamliliane implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT changblancdiana implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective AT patelmanish implementingthesynchronizedglobalswitchfromtrivalenttobivalentoralpoliovaccineslessonslearnedfromtheglobalperspective |