Cargando…
Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships
Body size governs predator-prey interactions, which in turn structure populations, communities, and food webs. Understanding predator-prey size relationships is valuable from a theoretical perspective, in basic research, and for management applications. However, predator-prey size data are limited a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29543856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194092 |
_version_ | 1783306893764067328 |
---|---|
author | Gaeta, Jereme W. Ahrenstorff, Tyler D. Diana, James S. Fetzer, William W. Jones, Thomas S. Lawson, Zach J. McInerny, Michael C. Santucci, Victor J. Vander Zanden, M. Jake |
author_facet | Gaeta, Jereme W. Ahrenstorff, Tyler D. Diana, James S. Fetzer, William W. Jones, Thomas S. Lawson, Zach J. McInerny, Michael C. Santucci, Victor J. Vander Zanden, M. Jake |
author_sort | Gaeta, Jereme W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Body size governs predator-prey interactions, which in turn structure populations, communities, and food webs. Understanding predator-prey size relationships is valuable from a theoretical perspective, in basic research, and for management applications. However, predator-prey size data are limited and costly to acquire. We quantified predator-prey total length and mass relationships for several freshwater piscivorous taxa: crappie (Pomoxis spp.), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), muskellunge (Esox masquinongy), northern pike (Esox lucius), rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu), and walleye (Sander vitreus). The range of prey total lengths increased with predator total length. The median and maximum ingested prey total length varied with predator taxon and length, but generally ranged from 10–20% and 32–46% of predator total length, respectively. Predators tended to consume larger fusiform prey than laterally compressed prey. With the exception of large muskellunge, predators most commonly consumed prey between 16 and 73 mm. A sensitivity analysis indicated estimates can be very accurate at sample sizes greater than 1,000 diet items and fairly accurate at sample sizes greater than 100. However, sample sizes less than 50 should be evaluated with caution. Furthermore, median log(10) predator-prey body mass ratios ranged from 1.9–2.5, nearly 50% lower than values previously reported for freshwater fishes. Managers, researchers, and modelers could use our findings as a tool for numerous predator-prey evaluations from stocking size optimization to individual-based bioenergetics analyses identifying prey size structure. To this end, we have developed a web-based user interface to maximize the utility of our models that can be found at www.LakeEcologyLab.org/pred_prey. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5854328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58543282018-03-28 Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships Gaeta, Jereme W. Ahrenstorff, Tyler D. Diana, James S. Fetzer, William W. Jones, Thomas S. Lawson, Zach J. McInerny, Michael C. Santucci, Victor J. Vander Zanden, M. Jake PLoS One Research Article Body size governs predator-prey interactions, which in turn structure populations, communities, and food webs. Understanding predator-prey size relationships is valuable from a theoretical perspective, in basic research, and for management applications. However, predator-prey size data are limited and costly to acquire. We quantified predator-prey total length and mass relationships for several freshwater piscivorous taxa: crappie (Pomoxis spp.), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), muskellunge (Esox masquinongy), northern pike (Esox lucius), rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu), and walleye (Sander vitreus). The range of prey total lengths increased with predator total length. The median and maximum ingested prey total length varied with predator taxon and length, but generally ranged from 10–20% and 32–46% of predator total length, respectively. Predators tended to consume larger fusiform prey than laterally compressed prey. With the exception of large muskellunge, predators most commonly consumed prey between 16 and 73 mm. A sensitivity analysis indicated estimates can be very accurate at sample sizes greater than 1,000 diet items and fairly accurate at sample sizes greater than 100. However, sample sizes less than 50 should be evaluated with caution. Furthermore, median log(10) predator-prey body mass ratios ranged from 1.9–2.5, nearly 50% lower than values previously reported for freshwater fishes. Managers, researchers, and modelers could use our findings as a tool for numerous predator-prey evaluations from stocking size optimization to individual-based bioenergetics analyses identifying prey size structure. To this end, we have developed a web-based user interface to maximize the utility of our models that can be found at www.LakeEcologyLab.org/pred_prey. Public Library of Science 2018-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5854328/ /pubmed/29543856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194092 Text en © 2018 Gaeta et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gaeta, Jereme W. Ahrenstorff, Tyler D. Diana, James S. Fetzer, William W. Jones, Thomas S. Lawson, Zach J. McInerny, Michael C. Santucci, Victor J. Vander Zanden, M. Jake Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships |
title | Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships |
title_full | Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships |
title_fullStr | Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships |
title_full_unstemmed | Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships |
title_short | Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships |
title_sort | go big or … don't? a field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29543856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaetajeremew gobigordontafieldbaseddietevaluationoffreshwaterpiscivoreandpreyfishsizerelationships AT ahrenstorfftylerd gobigordontafieldbaseddietevaluationoffreshwaterpiscivoreandpreyfishsizerelationships AT dianajamess gobigordontafieldbaseddietevaluationoffreshwaterpiscivoreandpreyfishsizerelationships AT fetzerwilliamw gobigordontafieldbaseddietevaluationoffreshwaterpiscivoreandpreyfishsizerelationships AT jonesthomass gobigordontafieldbaseddietevaluationoffreshwaterpiscivoreandpreyfishsizerelationships AT lawsonzachj gobigordontafieldbaseddietevaluationoffreshwaterpiscivoreandpreyfishsizerelationships AT mcinernymichaelc gobigordontafieldbaseddietevaluationoffreshwaterpiscivoreandpreyfishsizerelationships AT santuccivictorj gobigordontafieldbaseddietevaluationoffreshwaterpiscivoreandpreyfishsizerelationships AT vanderzandenmjake gobigordontafieldbaseddietevaluationoffreshwaterpiscivoreandpreyfishsizerelationships |