Cargando…

A computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis

Cell size is thought to play an important role in choosing between temporal and spatial sensing in chemotaxis. Large cells are thought to use spatial sensing due to large chemical difference at its ends whereas small cells are incapable of spatial sensing due to rapid homogenization of proteins with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Rui Zhen, Chiam, Keng-Hwee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005966
_version_ 1783306919565328384
author Tan, Rui Zhen
Chiam, Keng-Hwee
author_facet Tan, Rui Zhen
Chiam, Keng-Hwee
author_sort Tan, Rui Zhen
collection PubMed
description Cell size is thought to play an important role in choosing between temporal and spatial sensing in chemotaxis. Large cells are thought to use spatial sensing due to large chemical difference at its ends whereas small cells are incapable of spatial sensing due to rapid homogenization of proteins within the cell. However, small cells have been found to polarize and large cells like sperm cells undergo temporal sensing. Thus, it remains an open question what exactly governs spatial versus temporal sensing. Here, we identify the factors that determines sensing choices through mathematical modeling of chemotactic circuits. Comprehensive computational search of three-node signaling circuits has identified the negative integral feedback (NFB) and incoherent feedforward (IFF) circuits as capable of adaptation, an important property for chemotaxis. Cells are modeled as one-dimensional circular system consisting of diffusible activator, inactivator and output proteins, traveling across a chemical gradient. From our simulations, we find that sensing outcomes are similar for NFB or IFF circuits. Rather than cell size, the relevant parameters are the 1) ratio of cell speed to the product of cell diameter and rate of signaling, 2) diffusivity of the output protein and 3) ratio of the diffusivities of the activator to inactivator protein. Spatial sensing is favored when all three parameters are low. This corresponds to a cell moving slower than the time it takes for signaling to propagate across the cell diameter, has an output protein that is polarizable and has a local-excitation global-inhibition system to amplify the chemical gradient. Temporal sensing is favored otherwise. We also find that temporal sensing is more robust to noise. By performing extensive literature search, we find that our prediction agrees with observation in a wide range of species and cell types ranging from E. coli to human Fibroblast cells and propose that our result is universally applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5854446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58544462018-03-28 A computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis Tan, Rui Zhen Chiam, Keng-Hwee PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Cell size is thought to play an important role in choosing between temporal and spatial sensing in chemotaxis. Large cells are thought to use spatial sensing due to large chemical difference at its ends whereas small cells are incapable of spatial sensing due to rapid homogenization of proteins within the cell. However, small cells have been found to polarize and large cells like sperm cells undergo temporal sensing. Thus, it remains an open question what exactly governs spatial versus temporal sensing. Here, we identify the factors that determines sensing choices through mathematical modeling of chemotactic circuits. Comprehensive computational search of three-node signaling circuits has identified the negative integral feedback (NFB) and incoherent feedforward (IFF) circuits as capable of adaptation, an important property for chemotaxis. Cells are modeled as one-dimensional circular system consisting of diffusible activator, inactivator and output proteins, traveling across a chemical gradient. From our simulations, we find that sensing outcomes are similar for NFB or IFF circuits. Rather than cell size, the relevant parameters are the 1) ratio of cell speed to the product of cell diameter and rate of signaling, 2) diffusivity of the output protein and 3) ratio of the diffusivities of the activator to inactivator protein. Spatial sensing is favored when all three parameters are low. This corresponds to a cell moving slower than the time it takes for signaling to propagate across the cell diameter, has an output protein that is polarizable and has a local-excitation global-inhibition system to amplify the chemical gradient. Temporal sensing is favored otherwise. We also find that temporal sensing is more robust to noise. By performing extensive literature search, we find that our prediction agrees with observation in a wide range of species and cell types ranging from E. coli to human Fibroblast cells and propose that our result is universally applicable. Public Library of Science 2018-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5854446/ /pubmed/29505572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005966 Text en © 2018 Tan, Chiam http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tan, Rui Zhen
Chiam, Keng-Hwee
A computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis
title A computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis
title_full A computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis
title_fullStr A computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis
title_full_unstemmed A computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis
title_short A computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis
title_sort computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005966
work_keys_str_mv AT tanruizhen acomputationalmodelforhowcellschoosetemporalorspatialsensingduringchemotaxis
AT chiamkenghwee acomputationalmodelforhowcellschoosetemporalorspatialsensingduringchemotaxis
AT tanruizhen computationalmodelforhowcellschoosetemporalorspatialsensingduringchemotaxis
AT chiamkenghwee computationalmodelforhowcellschoosetemporalorspatialsensingduringchemotaxis