Cargando…

Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance

OBJECTIVES: Quantitative analysis of operator dose in cone-beam computed tomography guidance (CBCT-guidance) and the effect of protective shielding. METHODS: Using a Rando phantom, a model was set-up to measure radiation dose for the operator hand, thyroid and gonad region. The effect of sterile rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braak, SJ, Strijen van, MJL, Meijer, E, Heesewijk van, JPM, Mali, WPThM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038979
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbr-btr.816
_version_ 1783306921208446976
author Braak, SJ
Strijen van, MJL
Meijer, E
Heesewijk van, JPM
Mali, WPThM
author_facet Braak, SJ
Strijen van, MJL
Meijer, E
Heesewijk van, JPM
Mali, WPThM
author_sort Braak, SJ
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Quantitative analysis of operator dose in cone-beam computed tomography guidance (CBCT-guidance) and the effect of protective shielding. METHODS: Using a Rando phantom, a model was set-up to measure radiation dose for the operator hand, thyroid and gonad region. The effect of sterile radiation-absorbing drapes and ceiling/couch shielding was measured. Using this model we calculated the dose, based on relevant clinical parameters. The procedures were divided in thoracic and abdominal group. Furthermore, dosimetry measurements were performed during clinical cases to correlate with our calculations. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen procedures were included between December 2007 and January 2010 (47 thoracic, 66 abdominal). The mean hand doses were 34.2 and 54.6 µSv (thoracic/abdominal respectively). The thyroid and gonad regions doses were 83.2 and 34.3 µSv in the thoracic, and 66.2 and 47.2 µSv in the abdominal group. Combined shielding reduced the dose by 98.2–98.9% (p<0.05). The radiation dose in clinical setting in the thoracic group (n=17) was 32.9 µSv (hand), 11.4 µSv (thyroid) and 16.0 µSv (gonad region). In the abdominal group (n=20) the doses were 43.4, 21.7 and 18.8 µSv respectively. CONCLUSION: The operator dose in CBCT-guidance without shielding is quite low, compared to the literature. Based on our data, between 375–830 cases can be performed staying below the yearly limit of 20 mSv effective whole-body dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5854453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58544532018-07-23 Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance Braak, SJ Strijen van, MJL Meijer, E Heesewijk van, JPM Mali, WPThM J Belg Soc Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Quantitative analysis of operator dose in cone-beam computed tomography guidance (CBCT-guidance) and the effect of protective shielding. METHODS: Using a Rando phantom, a model was set-up to measure radiation dose for the operator hand, thyroid and gonad region. The effect of sterile radiation-absorbing drapes and ceiling/couch shielding was measured. Using this model we calculated the dose, based on relevant clinical parameters. The procedures were divided in thoracic and abdominal group. Furthermore, dosimetry measurements were performed during clinical cases to correlate with our calculations. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen procedures were included between December 2007 and January 2010 (47 thoracic, 66 abdominal). The mean hand doses were 34.2 and 54.6 µSv (thoracic/abdominal respectively). The thyroid and gonad regions doses were 83.2 and 34.3 µSv in the thoracic, and 66.2 and 47.2 µSv in the abdominal group. Combined shielding reduced the dose by 98.2–98.9% (p<0.05). The radiation dose in clinical setting in the thoracic group (n=17) was 32.9 µSv (hand), 11.4 µSv (thyroid) and 16.0 µSv (gonad region). In the abdominal group (n=20) the doses were 43.4, 21.7 and 18.8 µSv respectively. CONCLUSION: The operator dose in CBCT-guidance without shielding is quite low, compared to the literature. Based on our data, between 375–830 cases can be performed staying below the yearly limit of 20 mSv effective whole-body dose. Ubiquity Press 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5854453/ /pubmed/30038979 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbr-btr.816 Text en Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Braak, SJ
Strijen van, MJL
Meijer, E
Heesewijk van, JPM
Mali, WPThM
Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance
title Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance
title_full Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance
title_fullStr Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance
title_full_unstemmed Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance
title_short Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance
title_sort operator radiation exposure in cone-beam computed tomography guidance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038979
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbr-btr.816
work_keys_str_mv AT braaksj operatorradiationexposureinconebeamcomputedtomographyguidance
AT strijenvanmjl operatorradiationexposureinconebeamcomputedtomographyguidance
AT meijere operatorradiationexposureinconebeamcomputedtomographyguidance
AT heesewijkvanjpm operatorradiationexposureinconebeamcomputedtomographyguidance
AT maliwpthm operatorradiationexposureinconebeamcomputedtomographyguidance