Cargando…

A high-flow nasal cannula system with relatively low flow effectively washes out CO(2) from the anatomical dead space in a sophisticated respiratory model made by a 3D printer

BACKGROUND: Although clinical studies of the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and its effect on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been done, the washout effect has not been well evaluated. Therefore, we made an experimental respiratory model to evaluate the respiratory physiological effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onodera, Yu, Akimoto, Ryo, Suzuki, Hiroto, Okada, Masayuki, Nakane, Masaki, Kawamae, Kaneyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0172-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Although clinical studies of the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and its effect on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been done, the washout effect has not been well evaluated. Therefore, we made an experimental respiratory model to evaluate the respiratory physiological effect of HFNC. METHODS: An airway model was made by a 3D printer using the craniocervical 3D-CT data of a healthy 32-year-old male. CO(2) was infused into four respiratory lung models (normal-lung, open- and closed-mouth models; restrictive- and obstructive-lung, open-mouth models) to maintain the partial pressure of end-tidal CO(2) (P(ET)CO(2)) at 40 mmHg. HFNC flow was changed from 10 to 60 L/min. Capnograms were recorded at the upper pharynx, oral cavity, subglottic, and inlet sites of each lung model. RESULTS: With the normal-lung, open-mouth model, 10 L/min of HFNC flow decreased the subglottic P(ET)CO(2) to 30 mmHg. Increasing the HFNC flow did not further decrease the subglottic P(ET)CO(2). With the normal-lung, closed-mouth model, HFNC flow of 40 L/min was required to decrease the P(ET)CO(2) at all sites. Subglottic P(ET)CO(2) reached 30 mmHg with an HFNC flow of 60 L/min. In the obstructive-lung, open-mouth model, P(ET)CO(2) at all sites had the same trend as in the normal-lung, open-mouth model. In the restrictive-lung, open-mouth model, 20 L/min of HFNC flow decreased the subglottic P(ET)CO(2) to 25 mmHg, and it did not decrease further. As HFNC flow was increased, PEEP up to 7 cmH(2)O was gradually generated in the open-mouth models and up to 17 cmH(2)O in the normal-lung, closed-mouth model. CONCLUSIONS: The washout effect of the HFNC was effective with relatively low flow in the open-mouth models. The closed-mouth model needed more flow to generate a washout effect. Therefore, HFNC flow should be considered based on the need for the washout effect or PEEP.